These documents offer an important reminder that America’s population (like its history) has never been just black and white, but rather a much more diverse group. Drawing on the documents about Cherokee removal, the contract for a Chinese prostitute, and the Sarah Winnemucca piece, explore the differences that you see between the experiences of white and non-white women in the West. What insight do these readings provide into the ways that race and gender intersect? How do these documents change your understanding of westward expansion?
This must be 2-3 pages long.
It must be in MLA format.
There are specific readings that you must read. Access to the textbook, along with a sample paper, will be provided shortly.
Then, click on “RedShelf Inclusive Access” on the left-hand side of the screen. It should take you directly to the textbooks with no problems.
I have attached one of the required readings, “Xin Jin’s Contract”, here. I have also attached a sample paper.
Make sure to use MLA format, and check for proper spelling and grammar.
Make sure to use ALL of the readings listed in your response.
To give yourself some context, you may need to read Chapter 9 of A Concise Women’s History.
Answer preview
The gender roles of white and nonwhite women during the westward expansion provide insights into the general female experience in native America. The society was highly patriarchal, yet the white woman was more esteemed than the nonwhite women. This was depicted in their diverse gender roles in which the nonwhite woman would, in some instances, serve the white woman and her household. In the job market, nonwhite women would take up roles which white women would not, such as prostitution. The reading has given me a better understanding of the westward expansion that goes beyond the economic front.
