Climate Change
I need help please
Requirements— Your responses should be approximately the word total suggested for each of the five questions. These suggestions are approximate. Also, the text must be double spaced. (NOTE: there is a 2/3 letter grade penalty for noncompliance with the underlined factor). For a heading on the paper, use whatever you like as long as your name is present. Questions 1. According to Jamieson, there are several features of climate change that render the issues involved alien to our usual notions of commonsense morality. Discuss any two of them, explaining why they present such “hard’ issues. (100 wds.) 2. In thinking of ways to bring the harms of climate change within notions of commonsense morality, Jamieson discusses three possible methods of doing so. Ultimately he decides that only one of these even has any possibility of working. For that one possibility, he gives two theoretical strategies for accomplishing it, before concluding they might not work either. Briefly explain his reasoning regarding all this. (125wds.) 3. Using both Jamieson and the article by Gardiner, explain which aspect of climate change both think is the hardest issue, and the prospects for using ethics to solve, or at least address, the issue. (100 wds.) 4. Jamieson notes several different ways of respecting nature. Explain each, and why he thinks we do (or should) respect nature in the first place. (100 wds.) 5. Jamieson notes a few reasons why the harms to nation-states associated with climate change don’t look like traditional injustice between states. He considers one of these to be the most serious. Describe all the reasons, but spend most of the word count to explain the most serious one. (100 wds.)
5 Attachments
20171201153209now_we_have_a_moral_duty_to_talk_about_climate_change_by_mark_lynas 20171201153105we_were_warned 20171201153053stanford_researcher_examines_moral_significance_of_actions_causing_climate_change___________february_23 20171201153045center_for_humans
Answer Preview
Some of the aspects of climate change that make its harms unfamiliar to our morality are the genetics factor. Genetics cannot explain the variations in the level of engagement concerning climate changes. Factors such as economic forces will explain the inaction forces experience in different places. Some cultures have lowered the level of birth rates while some have mutilated genitals. However, proposing an argument that we were or were not evolved to do such things is an endless debate. Such factors do not contribute to…
(820 Words)