American University Case Study
ou need to write a 5-7-page (not including a reference page and cover page) analysis and recommendations. You are hired as an outside organizational behavior consultant. You have been brought in to fix the problems at American University with Benjamin Ladner and the American University. To get full credit you must use 5-7 terms from the textbook. You must also include a minimum of 4 additional sources beyond the use of the textbook. To write this paper you need to do research on root cause analysis, business process improvement, organizational behavior, and organizational change management and include how these terms apply to your analysis. CASE STUDY IS ATTACHED
lease follow all the direction very well.
the professor is very strict
Book Name:
Robbins, S. & Judge T. (2017). Essentials of Organizational Behavior.Boston, MA:Pearson.
Please do it verywell like you did it for me all the time.
Final paper assignment rubric
| Expert | Proficient | Apprentice | Novice | |
| Integration of Knowledge | The paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas. | The paper demonstrates that the author, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper. | The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. | The paper does not demonstrate that the author has fully understood, and applied concepts learned in the course. |
| Topic focus | The approach is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper. A solid logical and innovative strategy is clearly established. | The approach is focused lacks a highly innovative strategy. | The approach is not cohesive and focused enough for this assignment. | The approach and strategy is not clearly coherent. |
| Depth of discussion | In-depth discussion & elaboration in all sections of the paper. | In-depth discussion & elaboration in most sections of the paper. | The writer has omitted pertinent content or content runs-on excessively. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively. | Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections. |
| Cohesiveness | Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next without the need for headings. Author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. | For the most part, ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. | Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow – disjointedness is apparent. Author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. | Does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationships |
| Spelling and grammar | No spelling &/or grammar mistakes. | Minimal spelling &/or grammar mistakes. | Noticeable spelling & grammar mistakes. | Unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes. |
| Sources | More than 4 current sources, of which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative. | 4 current sources, of which at least 1 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are authoritative. | Fewer than 4 current sources, fewer than 1 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are credible. | Fewer than 4 current sources, or fewer than 1 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all web sites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current. |
| Citations | Cites all data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography. | Cites most data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography. There are some minor errors in the application of the APA 6th edition citation style. | Cites some data obtained from other sources. Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect. There are some significant errors with the use of APA 6th edition citation style. | Does not cite sources or failed significantly to effectively follow the APA 6th edition citation style as required on the graduate level. |
Answer previewOrganizational behavior consultant deals with the study of individuals and how they relate within a specific working environment (Luthans, Luthans, & Luthans, 2015). Their purpose is mainly to stem out issues in the organization. They then proceed to help improve both occupational dynamics and productivity (Robbins & Judge, 2017). The importance of knowledge on organizational behavior is that managers can come up with strategies of influencing employees to act in certain required ways. It is up to a corporate behavior consultant to advise the manager on ways of dealing with employees and driving the business towards success (Robbins & Judge, 2017). I have been…
(2000 words)