Citizens United V. Federal Election
Let’s argue just to argue
Absolutely no plagiarism, must be original and very thorough. Please make sure everything is followed in the question and the grading rubric. Assigned articles is attached but also must include at least 1 other academic relevant outside resource, total of at least 2 references. Must include in-text citations. Please include the free link to the relevant academic source.
Supporting material: Please feel free to use these links…Must also include one other academic relevant outside resource.
SUPREME COURT.(2010).CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION. WASHINGTON D.C. RETRIEVED FROM HTTP://WWW.SUPREMECOURT.GOV/OPINIONS/09PDF/08-205.PDF*PLEASE READ THE MAJORITY OPINION IN CASE BEGINNING ON PAGE 66 IF YOU ARE ASSIGNED TO ARGUE FOR THE DECISION OF THE COURT. IF YOU ARE ASSIGNED TO ARGUE AGAINST THE DECISION – REFER TO THE DISSENTING OPINIONS THAT BEGIN ON PAGE 88 OR 178.
Yang, T., & Zhao, S. (2012). CEO duality, competition, and firm performance. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2177403
Ferracone, R. (March, 2014). Combined chairman/CEO roles: Easier than you think. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/robinferracone/2014/03/05/combined-chairmanceo-roles-easier-than-you-think/
QUESTION:LET’S ARGUE FOR ARGUMENT SAKE!
If your last name begins with A – M: Present an argument against the decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Be sure to support your argument with specific examples.
PLEASE SEE GRADING RUBRIC BELOW. THIS ASSIGNMENT SHOULD BE AT LEAST 3-4 PARAGRAPHS LONG AND VERY THOROUGH. MAKE SURE YOU INTEGRATE REAL-LIFE APPLICATIONS TO SUPPORT KEY POINTS.
Answer previewCitizens United v. Federal Election Commission can be defined as a law which tries to regulate the amount of expenditure of organizations towards a particular electioneering campaign or a candidate…(350 words)