COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Choose one of the following four pairs of measures:
- Relative risk vs. attributable risk
- Cumulative incidence vs. incidence rate
- Life table vs. Kaplan–Meier approach to calculating cumulative incidence
- Odds ratio of disease vs. odds ratio of exposure
write a comparative analysis of the strengths and limitations of each measure within your pair. Then, explain assumptions that underlie each measure. Illustrate the comparison by providing examples from outside the course text of appropriate or inappropriate use of each measure. Justify your response.
Answer PreviewComparative analysis is a practice of comparing and contrasting two items or events. Comparative analysis of measures of occurrence and association is a methodology of analyzing events on the bases of their occurrences on a group of people…
(693 Words)