Conflicting Viewpoints

conflicting Viewpoints Essay Part I and Part II

When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking by playing the “Believing Game.” The Believing Game is about making the effort to “believe” – or at least consider – the reasons for an opposing view on an issue.

The assignment is divided into two (2) part/papers.
http://www.procon.org/sourcefiles/believinggame.pd.... Review the Procon.org Website in order to gather information.

Part I – Write a one (1) page paper in which you: Follow the instructions below for this writing activity.
1. Select one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website and state your position on the issue.
2. From the Procon.org Website, identify three (3) premises (reasons) listed under either the Pro or Con section – whichever section opposes your position.
3.For each of the three (3) premises (reasons) that oppose your position on the issue, answer these “believing” questions suggested by Elbow:

  1. What’s interesting or helpful about this view?
  2. What would I notice if I believed this view?
  3. In what sense or under what conditions might this idea be true?”
  4. This website will be your only cited reference needed for this paper/part I

When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking.

Part II
Write at five (5) page paper in which you:
1. State your position on the topic you selected for Part I.
2. Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explain why you selected these specific reasons.
3. Explain your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.
4. Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.
5. Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.
6. Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the same

7. Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.

8. Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences

9. Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA Style format

Answer preview

defend them. The third opposing view to the death penalty is that the government take the advantage of the death penalty to wrongly take human life (ProCon.org, 2018). The interesting thing about this idea is that it is totally wrong because the government has the role of protecting lives but not killing people. Believing this view would make me argue that it is the government that gives orders on which criminals should be punished by death. This idea can be true in the sense the government use death penalty as a way of reducing the number of people in the country.

[2002 Words]

Conflicting Viewpoints
Scroll to Top