Conduct an online search for a news article about a criminal case that occurred in the past 5 years. Your article review should address the information below.
What was used as circumstantial evidence in the case?
Discuss whether or not the use of plea bargaining was used in this criminal case. If it was not used, why do you think it was not used?
Would you say that the criminal was charged or not charged beyond a reasonable doubt? Why, or why not?
Analyze the article for findings on the interrelationship among courts, corrections, and law enforcement in this case. How do you think communication among these players was used in this case to form conclusions?
Support your article review with a minimum of one reference from the CSU Online Library.
Your article review must be at least two pages in length, not counting the title or reference pages. Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment and include in-text citations and references for all sources that are used. Please note that no abstract is needed
Answer preview
With the gathered facts and prior evidence of a similar crime on child pornography, I would say that the charge proved the offender’s guilt beyond a reasonable double. According to City News Service (2020), in March 2018, Hernandez had shown the intent to take part in sexual misconduct. On this note, he distributed pornographic materials of minors and controlled child porn, which made him a conviction of two years. Hence, committing a similar crime by possessing pornographic images increased proof that the offender had committed the crime. Generally, the communication between the probation officer, the Anaheim Police Department, and the court helped in the conclusions. Were it not for the probation officer, the police would not have known about the prior charges and current offense. Further, the police department forwarded the gathered findings to the court, which influenced the court ruling that the offender should serve three years in corrections.
