- Choose 5 DIFFERENT CASE STUDIES (these can be those we discuss or those we don’t; as long as they are from the TEXT, any case study will work).
- You are to analyze ALL 5 of the case studies using ONLY ONE of the following ethical theories: Kantian Deontology, Utilitarianism, Nozick’s theory, virtue ethics, Rawls’ theory, or Marxism.
- Make sure you provide a paragraph that accurately describes the theory you will be using.
- Make sure you describe the case study before you apply the theory.
- Provide a general assessment of the paper.
- Avoid using phrases like: “In my opinion,” “I believe,” “Ethics is difficult and not certain, so it is hard to tell if this ethical theory is right or not.” This is an ETHICS course, so don’t do or say anything in your ETHICS PAPER that would undermine ethics as a discipline. Further, you are making an ARGUMENT in this paper, as such there is no room for “personal opinions” or “feelings.” Just turn those opinions and feelings into statements of fact.
- This paper should be no less than 8 full pages and no more than 10. This papers should be well written, typed, doubled spaced, 12 point font, Times New Roman (Or equivalent font). No cover sheet needed. Include proper citation.
Requirements: 8 to 10 pages
It is a essay writing paper based on some case study documents which I already attached. You can also use case studies from other sources.
Answer preview
Voyages into space are celebrated all around the world. The United States is one of the countries that has managed to organize successful expeditions into space. Despite this, the country has had its fair share of disastrous voyages, with the most catastrophic one being the Challenger’s explosion barely one minute after taking off. According to Wall (2016), traveling to and from space poses numerous risks and dangers. Wall (2016) argues that the Challenger disaster was the first of its ilk in the country. Several wrong decisions played a pivotal role in this disaster. According to Wall (2016), the mission was affected by launch fever, as people struggled to get this mission going on time and get other missions going. This approach contributed to the Challenger disaster. Wall (2016) points out that the shuttle exploded due to the failure of the rubber O-ring seal located on the right-hand solid rocket booster. This failure allowed hot gas to escape and destroy the orbiter’s external fuel tank and the gears attaching the booster to the tank. Wall (2016) posits that several flaws characterized the decision to launch the shuttle. The people responsible for this decision were unaware of the history of issues plaguing the O-rings and the joint. Wall (2016) further asserts that these decision-makers were also
[2641 Words]
