Essay inadequately describes the selected historical event and/or the discussion is not historically accurate. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.
Essay adequately describes the selected historical, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
Essay expertly describes the selected historical event, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
20.0 %Law(s) Related to the Drug
Essay omits or incompletely describes of the law(s) related to the drug from the selected event. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
Essay inadequately describes the law(s) related to the drug from the selected event and/or the discussion is not historically accurate. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.
Essay adequately describes the law(s) related to the drug from the selected event, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
Essay clearly describes the law(s) related to the drug from the selected event, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claim. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.
Essay expertly describes the law(s) related to the drug from the selected event and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
Essay inadequately describes the impact of the drug on society including how the legal status of the drug has impacted society. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.
Essay adequately describes the impact of the drug on society including how the legal status of the drug has impacted society, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
Essay expertly describes the impact of the drug on society including how the legal status of the drug has impacted society, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
20.0 %History and Legality Impact on Counseling Profession
Essay omits or incompletely describes how an understanding of the history and legality of the drug from the selected event has impacted counseling profession. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
Essay inadequately describes how an understanding of the history and legality of the drug from the selected event has impacted counseling profession. Essay demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.
Essay adequately describes how an understanding of the history and legality of the drug from the selected event has impacted counseling profession, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
Essay clearly describes how an understanding of the history and legality of the drug from the selected event has impacted counseling profession, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claim. Essay demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.
Essay expertly describes how an understanding of the history and legality of the drug from the selected event has impacted counseling profession, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage
Answer preview
The first statute aimed at regulating and controlling drugs including opium and cocaine was the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906. It prohibited the production, use, and transfer of such drugs by imposing fines and imprisonment penalties. The 1909 Smoking Opium Exclusion Act, which was followed by the Harrison Act of 1914, which become the first law illegalizing the non-medical use of opium. In the year 1919, the Supreme Court ratified and made a few alterations to the Harrison Act. In 1922, Narcotic Drug Import and Export Act was for the regulation of drug importation and exportation which was matched by the 1932 Uniform State Narcotic Act. The 1927 Bureau of Prohibition was created to look into organized crime leaders. The Boggs Act, 1951 made maximum criminal penalties for drug-related crimes and was increased by the 1956 Narcotics Control Act. The 1970 Controlled Substance Act consolidated the numerous drug laws. There was Narcotic Addict Treatment Act of 1974 which provided for rehabilitation couple with the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000. Then there is the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act of 2016 amending the Controlled Substance Act.
