For this discussion: You can get Carla Wagner’s story Online just by Google it: Carla Wagner was an 18-year-old high school student, You can Google her to get her update status. Her story is also located in your module. Put it in your own words
Teens close to the age of 18, like Carla, maybe too old for the juvenile justice system, but too young for the adult system. What should be done with juveniles who are close to 18 when they receive a delinquency charge? Should something be done to bridge the gap between the juvenile justice system and the adult criminal justice system?
Do you think that Carla’s sentences were too harsh or not harsh enough? Consider the impact of wealthy parents on the criminal justice system. Carla was granted bond and released. What effect do money and race have on the legal system?
Answer preview
As a juvenile, Carla’s sentence was not too harsh but logical. In this sense, the 6-year sentence and educating peers about the adverse effects of drunken driving portrayed that the juvenile court identified a charge that best suits the juvenile (Scialabba, 2020). However, a significant challenge occurs when wealthy parents pay a bond, leading to the offender’s release, as seen in Carla’s case. In such circumstances, the ruling becomes not harsh enough because it portrays that the juveniles can buy their freedom even after committing a serious crime. Due to factors like socioeconomic status and race, this can promote unfair ruling. Money and race have adverse effects on the legal system since they can encourage inequality and prevent justice from being served to the plaintiffs. Therefore, denial of bond in such incidences should be considered to enhance equality and a just juvenile court system.
