according the article page58 “”in RE : eSTATE OF KUARLT 2000 MONT. 359(s. ct.MONT.2000) ” write the analyst caseaccording the article page58 “”in RE : eSTATE OF KUARLT 2000 MONT. 359(s. ct.MONT.2000) ” write the analyst case
according the article page58 “”in RE : eSTATE OF KUARLT 2000 MONT. 359(s. ct.MONT.2000) ” write the analyst case
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCaption and CitationFull Case Caption and Citation provided | 2.0 pts | |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAction StatementAction Statement accurately represent the action in the case | 2.0 pts | |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIssue StatementIssue Statement properly states the legal issue in the case | 2.0 pts | |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOpinion of the CourtLegal conclusion clearly states the opinion of the court and dissent | 2.0 pts | |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFactsFacts adequately represent the relevant facts related to the legal issue in the case | 2.0 pts |
Answer preview
handwritten will in 1989 stating that Shannon should inherit all his investments in Montana. Kuralt wrote another formal letter in 1994 with his counsel; however, this final letter did not offer any information about Kuralt’s properties. Therefore, the assumption was that the wife Petie and children were the formal beneficiaries in Kuralt’s last will. However, due to the conflicting claims of the Montana property after Kuralt’s deaths, Shannon offered the first letter to the court as a valid codicil.
Action Statement
The appealing Montana estate contended that the lower court failed to put into consideration the 1994’s will thus leading to legal errors. The appealing estate stated that the courts focused on Kuralt’s final will thus revoking the previous intents. The estate claimed that the principle of honoring the intentions of a testator should be granted (Smolensky, 2009).
[352 Words]
