Another critical dimension of group design is task significance which highlights the effect of the job on the organization’s individuals. For instance, at Ortiv corporation, the team selected held importance to the new plant’s managerial functions. The group design of this entity facilitates autonomy of tasks through job freedom which positively affects the diagnosis of design components.
On the contrary, the individual attributes of the members at Ortiv Top management level negatively influence the organizations’ job design (Cummings and Worley, 2014). Factors such as different skills, education, and job expectations. These elements have influenced how the recruited individual employees are motivated and satisfied at work. Lack of job congruence in this firm has created issues such as lack of interdepartmental relations, leading to chaotic decision-making.
