Research an organization that has recently had major conflict that made the news. You must identify the organization and the source of the conflict.
Instructions:
- Describe the five common approaches individuals use to deal with conflict, and identify and explain the approach(es) this organization has used to deal with conflict.
- Explain the negative and positive consequences of the conflict.
- Provide an example of how this organization could have handled the conflict in a different manner, and discuss possible outcomes from this approach.
- Summarize the strengths and weaknesses of the conflict resolution approaches you researched.
Paper Requirements:
- Your paper should include have APA formatting with an introduction and a conclusion and should be at least 5 pages long, not including the title or reference pages, which you must include.
- Incorporate 4 scholarly references exclude the following:
- Riccardi, P. (2014, October 21). Cross cultural communication [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=YMyofREc5Jk&t=63s - Shuh, S., Hernandez Bark, A. Van Quaquebeke, N., Hossein, R., Frieg, P. & Dick, R. (2014). Gender differences in leadership role occupancy: The mediating role of power motivation. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(3), 363-379.
Answer preview
The second approach in dealing with conflict is compromised. The technique involves moderate assertiveness and cooperation (Thomas & Kilmann, 2017). The objective of the approach is to reach a solution that is satisfying to the conflicting parties. The primary technique is to establish a quick middle-ground position. The third approach used to deal with conflict is collaboration. Collaboration involves a high level of assertiveness and collaboration. This technique aims to create a solution that will fully address the interests of both parties. A win-win situation is established where all the parties agree to work together to realize the desired solution. Important differences between the two parties are recognized, and solutions are established (Thomas, 2008). Personal responsibilities are ignored, while insignificant measures are given attention to enhance continuity in the team. However, the shared solution is one that each of the parties can support.
[1683 Words]
