Downloads

Senior management at Health Network allocated funds to support a risk mitigation plan, and have requested that the risk manager and team create a plan in response to the deliverables produced within the earlier phases of the project. The risk mitigation plan should address the identified threats described in the scenario for this project, as well as any new threats that may have been discovered during the risk assessment. You have been assigned to develop this new plan.

1. Go to Google Scholar (scholar.google.com). Conduct a search to find two papers written in the last five years that compare and contrast multiple machine-learning methods for a given problem domain. Observe com- monalities and differences among their findings and prepare a report to summarize your understanding.

1. This is a relatively brief case study; yet the problems faced are quite complex. In your workshop, how did you handle uncertainty in the information you have been given and how does this translate into real-world workshops where not all the answers can necessarily be given at the table?
2. What were some of the risk sources that emerged repeatedly in evaluating the risks? How is this helpful?
3. How would this risk assessment aid in the decision on whether or not to proceed with the new HR strategy?

Discuss the concept of life review. What are the goals and benefits of a life review? How is life review similar and different than ordinary remembering?

Your assignment this week is to conduct an interview of a non-profit leader. You can choose a CEO, Executive Director or person in an upper level leadership position. You should develop a list of questions designed to obtain information about the non-profit including information about the purpose and role the organization fulfills in society. You will submit a 660-to 990-word analysis of this organization that includes the impact the organization has on the community it serves. You will also evaluate whether or not the existence of this organization benefits society in general, providing a substantiated opinion of your evaluation. Your paper must be supported by a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed references.