In 200-300 words discuss the differences between the ontological views of Heraclitus and Parmenides. State what the strengths and weaknesses of each view are.
Answer preview
Further, it is evident to note that each view has a strength and weakness. For instance, a significant strength in Heraclitus idea is that it encourages people that situations in life are not constant since the conceptual changes have an impact on life. However, a weakness in this view is that struggle is as a block to success. Heraclitus failed to see that success and progressive change is achieved through mutual collaboration (Graham, 2017). On the other hand, a significant strength in Parmenides’ view is that it encourages people to use of logical thinking. However, a significant weakness is that it fails to consider the importance of empirical evidence since according to Parmenides, such evidence is deceptive.
[318 Words]