This week, you will be writing a paper in which you apply theories and concepts from social psychology related to prosocial behavior, rejection, and close relationships. You will also be required to apply behavioral ethics and critical thinking concepts. Successful practitioners understand the dynamics of various relationships. Their understanding of that which affects a successful relationship enables them to support positive and loving relationships for their clients.
CASE STUDY- SUSAN: SOCIAL UP & DOWN – ATTACHED I HAVE SUBMITTED SUSAN CASE STUDY; THE SELECTED THEORY, BEHAVIORAL ETHICS & CRITICAL THINKING CONCEPTS EMBEDDED WITH SUSAN’S CASE STUDY
I HAVE ALSO ATTACHED THE SCORING GUIDE. APA STYLE WRITING & REFERENCES REQUIRED
Instructions
This week you will be writing a paper that includes the following:
- Summarize the case study.
- Describe credible and scholarly sources, relevant to a particular theory.
- Apply a social psychological theory to a chosen case study.
- Explain how social psychological research studies relate to a particular social psychological theory.
- Apply an ethical reasoning concept to a chosen case study.
- Apply a critical thinking concept to a chosen case study.
- Provide a conclusion.
- Create a text in the third person, adhering to conventions of academic tone.
- Demonstrate compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines
- Length: 4–5 double-spaced pages, in addition to the title page and reference page.
- Reciprocity: Mahmoodi, A., Bahrami, B., & Mehring, C. (2018). Reciprocity of social influence. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1–9
Requirements: 4-5 PAGES EXCLUDING TITLE & REF
i uploaded everything you will need but if you need anything else please let me know. I have attached the case study, the chosen 3 concepts and the scoring guide.
Answer preview
Moral awareness appertains to an individual’s capacity to recognize that a particular issue poses an ethical challenge that requires an individual to evaluate the moral implications of the decision (Reynolds & Miller, 2015). In this instance, Susan recognizes that Mark’s actions offend her, and she needs to take action. Ignoring the entire puzzle is an escapist approach because it does not address the problem at hand and exposes her to further violation of her feelings and emotions. The second option would be to address the matter privately. Still, this alternative is significantly impaired because Mark did not pursue private channels to communicate his romantic interest. Instead, Mark went overboard and started proclaiming his affection for Susan to all and sundry on the internet, bringing more people into the situation. While it would have
[1434 Words]