Law
Criminal justice system
What is the biggest challenge in relation to multiculturalism/diversity in prison populations? You can start your research on page 334 of the book, and also look for outside resources to support your opinion. Remember that your first post needs to be at least 8 sentences, and cite your sources.
Then respond to another student who chose to discuss a challenge different than yours. This post needs to be at least 4 substantive sentences.
Supreme Court of a Federal District court
Your write-up should be 1 to 2 pages, single spaced, at standard type face (12 or 14 point).
It should briefly (in very few sentences) lay out the basic facts of the case. These are usually generally agreed upon by the time it gets to final appeal stage; i.e., the Supreme Court of a Federal District court.
discussion should be 1.5pages
1. Case write-up requirement:
1. Your write-up should be 1 to 2 pages, single spaced, at standard type face (12 or 14 point).
2. It should briefly (in very few sentences) lay out the basic facts of the case. These are usually generally agreed upon by the time it gets to final appeal stage; i.e., the Supreme Court of a Federal District court.
3. What is much more important is the issue at law – the dispute about what the law means or how it should be interpreted.
4. What was the majority of the court’s decision in the case, and – more importantly – what was the basic
Criminal justice
Locate an article on the Internet that addresses a current budgeting issue for an area of criminal justice administration in your state.
Create a Powerpoint presentation on the following:
The main idea of the article and reasons for your choice
The author’s conclusions and recommendations
Your own conclusions and recommendations
Include presenter notes
The presentation must be approximately 10 minutes in length and include 10 to 12 slides.
Honest mistake rule
What is the honest mistake rule? Your response must be at least 75 words in length.references or citations are optional
What is the origin of the exclusionary rule? Your response must be at least 75 words in length.references or citations are optional
What is the origin of the Miranda rule? Your response must be at least 75 words in length.references or citations are optional
What are some of the limitations of the exclusionary rule? Your response must be at least 75 words in length.references or citations are optional
Historic financial scam
Your write-up should be 1 to 2 pages, single spaced, at standard type face (12 or 14 point).
It should briefly (in very few sentences) lay out the basic facts of the case. These are usually generally agreed upon by the time it gets to final appeal stage; i.e., the Supreme Court of a Federal District court.
What is much more important is the issue at law – the dispute about what the law means or how it should be interpreted.
What was the majority of the court’s decision in the case, and – more importantly – what was the basic reasoning behind this decision?
If you are asked to read a dissent in the case, what was the decision and reasoning in the minority?
Do you agree or disagree with the court’s decision? Explain why.
This week we also have one case writeup which I am going to send you over now. And please include your references in the response. You can cite certain external references as well to support your argument.
Bill of Rights
Is there anything else you would add to the Bill of Rights if you were asked to make an amendment? What would you add, and why? If you would not add anything, justify why you think nothing else is needed. IT MUST BE at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.
What is your opinion of the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine? IT MUST BE at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.
How would you summarize the basic rights of a U.S. citizen? Your response must be at least 75 words in length.references or citations are optional
What does the term habeas corpus mean? Your response must be at least 75 words in length.references or citations are optional
What is the Bill of Rights? Your response must be at least 75 words in length.references or citations are optional
Jews In Power
Need an outline done.
Formulate a research question. (How did Hitler view Jews in power during the Holocaust?)
Give historical background on it.
Talk about the sources, what they are and what they do.
Please use these sources and any other ones you think can be beneficial: Wilhelm Marr a book by Moshe Zimmerman , Mein Kampf
Please talk about how you will go about answering the research question.
Freedom of expression
To write a country report on human rights violations/issues on Turkey. pick any topics/issues that are relevant to denial of freedom of expression and freedom of association in Turkey from the year 2019 and 2020 only.
Use APA style format and 2700 is word limit use between 2600 and 2700 words only.
Format:
First para:
introduce paper briefly to give Readers brief idea about what paper is about.Include thesis statement and mention specific argument on which the whole is written about.
Protection of civil liberties
Question Description: The American Government has faced numerous lawsuits in attempts to balance security and the civil liberties of its citizens. From lawsuits questioning the legality of the USA PATRIOT Act to the separation of immigrant families, research, and analyze where your dissertation focus may face scrutiny if adopted into policy. Within your analysis after identifying the core factors of your research that will face resistance, present data that supports why you feel that your research is needed.
Arbitration agreements
Employment laws impact everyone, regardless if you are actively employed or not. As employers continue to control costs associated with claims from employees, employers have commonly turned to arbitration agreements. These agreements normally require employees to waive any right or protection afforded by joining a class action and instead forces each individual employee to take the claims before an individual arbitration. In 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) decided in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis by a narrow margin of 5-4 that employers could enforce these arbitration agreements.
In your assignment this week please explain why the court got this correct AND explain why the court was wrong. Lastly, if you were the 10th justice how would you vote and why?
This link should provide you with details on the case: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2017/16-285
Click on the left hand side under “Opinions” for full details.
Constitutional and Ethical Foundations
I’m looking for someone who does not use Chegg or Course Hero or any online cites to provide your answers. The professor checks these other sites as well. If you do this to provide your answers and don’t use your own, let me know immediately so I can choose someone else to assist me. I have been notified that an assignment was linked to Chegg or Course Hero etc.
Someone that uses their own words, so nothing can be found on the internet.
Someone who does not Plagiarize others work from online websites.
I have word documents attached with the instructions.
Then let me know.
Thank you.
Subjects are:
Criminal Justice
Supreme Court of a Federal District court
Your write-up should be 1.25 to 2 pages (2.5 pages double spaced), single spaced, at standard type face (12 or 14 point).
It should briefly (in very few sentences) lay out the basic facts of the case. These are usually generally agreed upon by the time it gets to final appeal stage; i.e., the Supreme Court of a Federal District court.
What is much more important is the issue at law – the dispute about what the law means or how it should be interpreted.
What was the majority of the court’s decision in the case, and – more importantly – what was the basicreasoning behind this decision?
If you are asked to read a dissent in the case, what was the decision and reasoning in the minority?
Do you agree or disagree with the court’s decision? Explain why.
Equal Rights Amendment
This written assignment includes essay questions which probe your understanding of the course materials, theories and concepts covered in this course. Students are asked to show competence in critical thinking and writing skills.
Essay must be at least two (2) pages in length. This includes your own words and excludes citations and works cited.
You are expected to read the prompt carefully and address its questions in a concise way.
Paper must include an introduction, body/discussion/review of literature (at least two peer-reviewed articles), conclusion, and a bibliography or works cited page.
Use MLA format. For information on formatting, you may consult the College library online or the Writing Center.
Review and cite two peer-reviewed articles that are relevant to the topic you have selected. This includes academic articles, books and other published works. Wikipedia, answers.com, etc. are not acceptable sources. An essay without reviewed articles won’t be graded.
Upload your completed work in MS Word FORMAT (please check the content of your file prior to uploading).
Include a cover page that has your name, course information and selected topic number and its prompt.
Carefully review your work prior to submission, essay will be checked for plagiarism using Turnitin.com.
Criminal case
Conduct an online search for a news article about a criminal case that occurred in the past 5 years. Your article review should address the information below.
Summarize the case and the article’s premise.
What was used as criminal evidence in the case?
What was used as circumstantial evidence in the case?
Discuss whether or not the use of plea bargaining was used in this criminal case. If it was not used, why do you think it was not used?
Would you say that the criminal was charged or not charged beyond a reasonable doubt? Why, or why not?
Analyze the article for findings on the interrelationship among courts, corrections, and law enforcement in this case. How do you think communication among these players was used in this case to form conclusions?
Criminal court process
What is your opinion on the use of dogs to detect criminal evidence? Do you think they should be used in only certain crime scenes or situations and not in others? Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.
If you could make one change to the criminal court process, what would it be? Why? Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary
What is your opinion of security screening at airports, courthouses, and other public buildings? Do you think we should be more or less concerned with special needs searches? Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.
International Court of Justice
2.As you know, the International Criminal Court has jurisdiction over such internationally-recognized offenses as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. At the Kampala Conference in 2010, the Assembly of States Parties added to that list the crime of aggression. Should the jurisdiction of the ICC be expanded to include other crimes? If so, which, and why? If not, should we be concerned that this list is too narrow, which may allow serious human rights abusers to evade justice?
3.The Refugee Convention of 1951 defines a refugee as someone who has fled, or is in any event outside, his or her country of nationality, and is unable to return because of “a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, [or] membership of a particular social group or political opinion.” Europe, and to a lesser extent the Unites States, are currently being inundated by individuals described by the mainstream media as “refugees,” but who do not meet the Convention’s definition: they are seeking improved quality of life, not fleeing from persecution. Assuming that “economic migrants” are not eligible to receive the benefits to which refugees are entitled under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol, what obligations must receiving states honor in their treatment of these people?
4.Ever since it handed down its judgment in the Gabcikovo-Nagamaros Project Case in 1997, the ICJ has increasingly suggested that states depending on a common natural resource, such as a watercourse, are bound by an obligation, established through customary international law, of “equitable sharing.” Numerous international environmental treaties are based on this principle. This is said to derive from the concept of sic utere tuo, which the Court held in the Corfu Channel Case in 1949 is a rule binding on all states.
That sounds delightful, doesn’t it? Who could be against “equitable sharing”? But it is terribly vague. When, say, a river flows from Country A into Country B, and Country A desires to build a dam that will substantially reduce the river water available in Country B but will bring substantial improvements to the quality of life of the people of Country A, what considerations should be taken into account in determining whether the proposed “sharing” of the watercourse is “equitable”?
National Institute of Justice
Question Description: 1. In at least 350 words, explain how technology, such as cell phones and social media, has impacted the issues of ethics and social justice in the criminal justice system.
2. The police subculture is defined by secrecy, solidarity, and cynicism. In at least 350 words, reflect on how a subculture that promotes these attributes impacts an officer’s ability to conduct himself or herself in a professional and ethical manner.
3. According to the National Institute of Justice (2016), police officers “should use only the amount of force necessary to mitigate an incident, make an arrest, or protect themselves or others from harm” (para. 5). How does a police officer determine the “right” amount of force to use? When is use of force considered unlawful? In this Discussion, you will identify a specific incident involving the of use of force and determine whether it was lawful. In doing so, you will consider the outcomes of two landmark U.S. Supreme Court Cases: Tennessee v Garner (1985) and Graham v Connor (1989).
National Institute of Justice. (2016). Police use of force. Retrieved from https://www.nij.gov/topics/law-enforcement/officer-safety/use-of-force/pages/welcome.aspx
Criminal Justice System
Question Description: (MSCJ) Assignment: Ethical Challenges in the Criminal Justice System
In this Assignment, you are a criminal justice practitioner with 5 years of experience. You have been asked by your supervisor to prepare a PowerPoint presentation (with slide notes) for recent academy graduates on ethical challenges in the criminal justice field.
The (MSCJ) Assignment: Using the Walden University PowerPoint Presentation Template, create a 10-slide PowerPoint presentation (including annotated slide notes) that includes the following:
Title/name of presentation (1 slide)
Ethical challenges related to the following areas (1 slide each):
Use of authority
Relationships between personal and professional interests
Personal and professional commitments to clients
Common Committed Fraud
Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
Search the library’s database for an article about the most commonly committed fraud in a geographic area of your choice (Alabama).
Note: Do not duplicate other students’ articles.
Summarize the article in your posting.
Jeopardized justice
1. in the summary section, what are mandatory minimums? How do mandatory minimums vary, according to crime (hint: drug laws)? Also, how has this jeopardized justice in limiting the authority that judges have in addressing criminal behavior? Please list the federal statutes, or drug laws passed by congress, in your answer. Lastly, what are some of the arguments against mandatory minimums? How have they been misused? Explain your answer.