Law
Supreme Court of the United States
Affirmative Action and the Law” Please respond to the following:
Analyze the Bakke and the University of Michigan rulings and discuss two implications these court rulings have on you as the personnel manager of your agency.
Debate It: Take a position for or against the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in 1986 on the use of affirmative action in hiring, promotion, and layoffs for your agency. Provide at two reasons and examples to support your position.
Incorporate a business
Describe what documents need to be prepared and filed with the Ohio Secretary of State to:
incorporate a business
establish an LLC
2. Describe what documents does a bank need to review to lend money and what documents a bank would require to be signed for a loan?
3. Done the Corporation or LLC:
have and patents, copyrights?
filed bankruptcy?
been sued? pending lawsuits?
have any liens against it?
own real estate?
if they lease, who owns the building?
Illegal immigrants
Write a five-page essay with introduction and conclusion that defends an argument in response to an ethical problem or debate that you think demands more attention.
Topic: Immigration and DACA Division
You must cite at least one of the texts we have read for class
Your essay should address the following questions (directly or indirectly)
o What’s the problem or debate?
o What makes it an ethical problem or debate? Why is it an ethical problem?
o Why should it matter to us, or why should we care, or what is really at stake? Or what are the larger implications of not addressing this problem?
o What’s the most reasonable way to respond to the problem and why?
o What does your argument reveal about your basic ethical principles?
U.S. customs and practices
Provide some examples of customs and practices from around the world that could be considered human rights violations by the United States. Then find some examples of U.S. customs and practices that other nations might regard as human rights violations.
Your answer should have a minimum of 200 words and your response to two other students’ posts should be a minimum of 100 each.
Intellectual property
In this unit, you will select a case law pertaining to the topic of intellectual property.
Each case law analysis allows you to express yourself as clearly and fully as possible in dissecting a court decision. The purpose of the assignment is two-fold:
To give you the opportunity to read a real court decision.
To challenge you to think about how you would have decided the case. In your case law analyses, you must be able to navigate the court’s decision and summarize it; you are not expected to act as a judge or an advocate.
Using your selected court decision, prepare an analysis that responds to the following:
Articulates the importance, context, purpose, and relevance of law in a business environment:
Identify the parties who are before the court.
Provide a brief background to the problem. Summarize the facts in no more than 2–3 paragraphs.
Identify what is the specific disagreement between the parties.
Explain the ruling of the court in no more than 1–2 paragraphs.
Evaluates key judicial concepts that influence the decisions related to business:
Was there a dissenting opinion? If so, explain why some of the judges or justices disagreed with the majority in the decision.