Politic
IS Trupsim the new McCarthyism
My research QUESTION is : IS Trupsim the new McCarthyism?
please follow all the steps in the guide.
it should be 10 pages without the cover and references page
Instructor/PNT GUIDE
For Mid-Term and Final Paper
1. Cover Page (Your Name
TITLE OF PAPER: THE QUESTION
Name of Professor/Student Name
Course Title/CRN Number/Date
2. Table of Contents
3. SUMMARY (10 sentences) the findings about the research for midterm and final/paper/policy brief
4. What is the issue? And The Question: Frame a question to address the issue. Your paper must respond to only one question
5. Background Info
Priority of the Negotiation Issues
I have an assignment which is:
To prepare for your “role” (buyer vs. seller), you will need to read the confidential information about your role. The confidential information will be emailed to the buyers and sellers separately. Do NOT share this background information with your negotiating partner. It will ruin the fun of the exercise, and you won’t get nearly as much out of it.
Planning Document: This is an individual assignment. Please read your role confidential information, prepare for a planning document, save as a PDF file, and submit through Canvas. The planning document must be completed before you conduct the mock negotiation with your partner.
Historical and Political Context
Please follow the instructions carefully.
• 10 Page Analytical Essay
you will work on a paper that will be a minimum of 10 pages, not counting the Works Cited page. You will choose a public figure and thoroughly analyze his or her rhetoric in context. Your paper should contain the following:
1. A thesis statement that identifies your figure’s main argument and supporting claims that will be the focus of your paper;
2. Relevant historical or political context that readers need to know in order to understand your analysis;
3. A thorough analysis of your figure’s rhetorical strategies (that is, how s/he is attempting to persuade their audience, and for what purpose). Use quotes and examples from your figure’s speeches, writings, or interviews to support your analysis;
4. A thorough evaluation of the persuasive value of his or her rhetoric–is it persuasive? Is it truthful? Deceitful? Explain why you find it persuasive or unpersuasive and truthful or deceitful (or a combination).
5. A substantive discussion of the significance of this figure and why understanding this person’s rhetoric is important.
Public School Funding
OBJECTIVE: Public school finance in Texas is a complex and emotional issue for many residents. On one hand, there are those who support local control over anything else. Others point to a system that is flawed in favor of wealthier districts over lower-income districts. The state has tried to address this issue multiple times to find solutions that are both constitutional and equitable. Every time they do, the plan is challenged in court as someone argues it is illegal or unconstitutional (per the TX constitution). The main objective here is to learn more about why education funding is so problematic.
WHAT TO DO: Your task is to watch the three videos in this folder and answer a set of questions. There are 5 questions worth 2 points each. Be sure to answer each IN YOUR OWN WORDS (don’t just mimic the exact words of the video/transcript) and do so in at least 7 complete sentences (don’t be lazy!). You should create a word file that answers the questions and upload it to this dropbox. Here are your questions:
Public Apology
So there are 3 parts to this essay prompt, there are 3 parts, you choose a public apology, re-write it, analyze it and come up with the research part. I will attach the prompt so it’s more clear on how to do it.
due thursday night at midnight EST. April 5th, so there is plenty of time.
total amount of words will be around 1250 minimum.
The better work quality, the higher tip.