Breast Cancer Research Review

$10.00

Research Review Paper Outline

Select two published research papers for your review: The research paper must be published in a reputable journal such as the following: The New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of American Medical Association, The Lancet, or American Journal of Public Health
Study hypothesis – a working assumption

Summarize the working assumption used by the study researchers in the two research papers that you are planning to critique and review
Population – describe the population used in the two research papers, for example
Closed cohort – membership is defined by a given event, and no exit is possible
Dynamic population – membership is defined by a given state, and exit occurs when the state terminates

Study design – describe the study design used in the research that you are reviewing
Experimental
Observational
Both

Reflection paper

$4.00

reflection paper
Tthere are 4 chapters from two books , please read them and write a reflection paper. try to write what confused you , what you did not understand . and ask questions. also write what do like in the chapter and give you a good or new information

Frontline Leaders

$5.00

If this video does not load properly, it can be accessed by clicking here (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Transcript

This week you will be creating and submitting a draft of your Final Research Paper that is based on the topic you selected from the Research Paper Guidelines and from the Final Research Paper Outline from Week 2. Please be sure to review the Model Research Paper Draft and Week 3 Assignment Template to understand the expectations for the assignment this week.

The Final Research Paper Draft must contain the following components:

A title page and a references page (based upon your annotated bibliography).
An introduction that features a thesis statement that is clearly articulated and argumentative and/or analytical. Ideally, the introduction should be a single, compelling paragraph.

Research Techniques for Health Sciences

$24.00

The purpose of this assignment is to draft and submit a comprehensive and complete rough draft of an APA research paper. Your rough draft should include all of the research paper elements of a final draft.

Recommended: Before you begin, review chapter 10 in A Pocket Style Manual (APA) and chapters 13 and 14 in Research Techniques for Health Sciences.

Include the following in your 11-15 page rough draft:

Headings
Title page
Abstract
Introduction
Literature review: a review of relevant studies focusing on the theory and its importance

Quasi-experimental variables and designs

$2.00

Directions: Provide short answers of 100-150 words each for the following questions/statements. Do not exceed 200 words for your response. Use the textbook, and any other scholarly resources to support your responses. Include at least two to three peer-reviewed journal articles beyond the textbook and course readings.

1.What are the features of quasi-experimental variables and designs? Under what conditions would this type of approach be appropriate? Provide at least one example in your response.

External validity in quantitative research

$4.00

Post an explanation of a threat to internal validity and a threat to external validity in quantitative research. Next, explain a strategy to mitigate each of these threats. Then, identify a potential ethical issue in quantitative research and explain how it might influence design decisions. Finally, explain what it means for a research topic to be amenable to scientific study using a quantitative approach.

Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.

Required Readings
Babbie, E. (2017) Basics of social research (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Chapter 3, “The Ethics and Politics of Social Research

Secondary data sources

$2.00

What are the major problems in using secondary data sources, such as birth or death certificate data? What, if anything, can the evaluator do about these problems?

Critique of the research study

$4.00

Post a critique of the research study in which you:

Evaluate the research questions using the Research Questions and Hypotheses Checklist as a guide

Identify the type of qualitative research approach used and explain how the researchers implemented the design

Analyze alignment among the theoretical or conceptual framework, problem, purpose, research questions, and design

Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.

rticle B:

Liu, J., McMahon, M., & Watson, M. (2015). Parental influence on child career development in mainland China: A qualitative study. The Career Development Quarterly, 63(1), 74–87. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2015.00096.x

Required Readings

Critique of the research study

$4.00

Post a critique of the research study in which you:

Evaluate the research questions using the Research Questions and Hypotheses Checklist as a guide

Identify the type of qualitative research approach used and explain how the researchers implemented the design
Analyze alignment among the theoretical or conceptual framework, problem, purpose, research questions, and design

Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.

Description of Research Methodology

$6.00

In this assignment, you will write an essay about the research methods and ethical implications of a social psychology study. You will get information about the study from one of the entries in the SPARQ “Solutions Catalog”, which is a web site maintained by Stanford University at https://sparq.stanford.edu/solutions?&&. SPARQ is an acronym for “Social Psychological Answers to Real-world Questions.” Each entry in the Solutions Catalog names a problem, and then offers a solution to that problem, based on a research study in social psychology.

The article I chose: https://sparq.stanford.edu/solutions/boost-grades-reframing-failures

References

Wilson, T. D. (n.d.). Boost grades by reframing failures.  Retrieved from https://sparq.stanford.edu/solutions/boost-grades-reframing-failures

Wilson, T. D. & Linville, P.W. (1982).  Improving the academic performance of college freshmen:  attribution therapy revisited.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 (2), 367-376.

To keep this assignment short and manageable, your only sources for this assignment should be from the SPARQ site and your course materials, such as your textbook. There is no need for you to cite any of the course materials. Therefore, no additional citations or references are needed, beyond those from the SPARQ site.

In this exercise, you will choose one of the entries in the SPARC site, and then write a two to three (2-3) page paper that meets the following requirements.

Thanx for picking up the week 2 assignment for social psychology. I am trying to send you the grading rubric as well.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 150

Assignment 1: Description of Research Methodology

Scroll to Top