Although drug courts have become popular across the United States, they continue to be a controversial topic. Politically, these judicial interventions may be construed as being “soft” on crime. Proponents of drug courts use science and statistics to help justify their viability.

Using the module’s readings and the Argosy University online library resources, research the definition and role of drug courts.

Tasks:

In a minimum of 300 words, respond to the following:

• Provide a definition of drug courts.
• Explain whether you agree or disagree with the concept of drug courts. Give reasons supported by scholarly research.

Apply APA standards to citation of sources.

Submission Details:

• By the due date assigned, post your responses to this Discussion Area.
• Through the end of module, respond to at least two other classmates’ posts. Participate in the discussion by asking a question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a relationship between one or more lines of reasoning in the discussion.

Answer preview

Drug courts continue to receive appraisal among most of the United States. However, the drug courts continue to receive arising problems associated with political policies explaining that the drug courts promote softness in criminal punishment. However, drug courts focus on both the sentencing of the criminal and the health condition. Drug courts are courts, specifically supervised dockets, that aim at the provision of alternative sentencing focused on both supervision and treatment of various criminals (Nolan, 2017). Drug courts include patients like prisoners suffering from substance abuse or possess…