Environmental health problem.

PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT FOR REFERENCE**

Final Project: Final Paper

This week, you will describe the range of options that are available to address the problem. (Defining a core list of reasonable options is a critically important part of the process of developing a solution to a problem.) You will also formulate a concise argument for your recommendations for the problem

For this assignment:

  • Review a reputable source of information on developing options and resolving conflicts when solving problems.
  • Study the range of options that have previously been proposed or tested for solving your chosen environmental health problem. Create additional potential options based on your own judgment and knowledge. Identify potential advantages and disadvantages of each option.
  • Write a 15- to 20-page, double-spaced paper in Word format addressing the following:
    • State the 2- to 3-sentence problem statement you submitted in Week 2.
    • Briefly introduce the topic of generating options when solving a problem. Describe a formal method by which the advantages and disadvantages of potential options can be evaluated by stakeholder groups to rank the potential options and to resolve conflicts when ranking options.
    • Describe and analyze several options to address the problem (options). Include solutions for populations with disparities, if applicable.
    • Limit your consideration to three to four major options. Briefly describe each option and the main advantages and disadvantages of each major option for solving the problem, including:
      • The likely effectiveness of the proposed solution
      • Costs in terms of dollars as well as effort and other resources (the exact costs are not needed but options should be described in semiquantitative terms ranging from “very expensive” to “relatively inexpensive” or ranging from “most expensive” to “least expensive”)
      • Time required for the option to bring about the desired result
      • Stakeholder issues (limit this section to the key stakeholder groups you identified in your Week 4 landscape paper. Discuss your three to four proposed options with regard to acceptability to certain stakeholders, lack of acceptability to other stakeholders, and common ground for all stakeholders)
      • Potential unforeseen consequences of the proposed solution or difficulties in implementing the solution
    • Summarize your three to four chosen options
    • Clearly identify which option is favored.
    • Describe why this option is preferred over the other options. Explain why, despite the drawbacks, this is the best action to take.
    • Identify what, if any, actions may be taken to mitigate or to overcome the negative aspects of your recommendations.

Requirements: 15 pages (double spaced)

Answer preview

Despite the implementation of the RRP act of 1992, which barred the use of lead paints in residential homes and child-occupied facilities, a substantial number of lead poisoning among children are recorded. It further ordered residential dwellings and child-occupied facilities built before 1978 to be renovated to avoid lead contamination because most of these facilities were constructed using led paints, faucets, and lead plumbing fixtures due to their durability nature. According to the EPA.gov report, there were over 30 million homes in the United States containing lead coating, faucet, or lead plumbing fixations, posing a considerable risk to millions of children (McIntyre, 2015).

According to a study conducted by the Joint Centre for Housing Study of Harvard University (JCHS), African American children living in poor neighborhoods are more predisposed to lead poisoning compared to their white counterparts. According to data collected between 1995 to 2013 in Chicago, predominantly African American neighborhoods consistently

[5042 Words]

Scroll to Top