motivation theorizing.
You know now that there are various theories (some content-, others process-based) of how we can look at motivation.
Comparing all the theories you read about, which one seems to you to be the most convincing? Discuss them to conclude, based on your past experiences, which you think best describes how people in groups are most motivated – especially to collaborate with one another.
Don’t forget to account for the role of various personal motivations in persuading and influencing others – and how your own motivations/desires may have influenced which theory/model you find most convincing.
please use these key terms in the paper to answer the question. there’s key terms are from the readings attached below. Also make sure to put the key terms in the bold font.
motivation
Content theories
differentiation
integration
motivators
Hygienes
extrinsic rewards
sense of choice
sense of competence
sense of progress
Attribution Theory
Goal Theory
Behaviorism
interior states
material exchanges
social links
systemic thinking
organizational memory
Please use all these key terms to answer the question asked above.
Answer preview
For a group to perform its agendas effectively motivation is necessary and need to be fulfilled in the understanding that it’s not easy to influence people to perform a task. Both intrinsic and extrinsic rewards influence the extent of the group cooperation. Motivation as a leadership role requires the use of instrumental reasons to determine what motivators best fit a group. This discussion is the position of the most convincing theories of motivation from the perspective of group collaboration in which individuals establishes social links to achieve common goals. The theories in the discussion are…
(1300 words)