Preliminary.

For our assignment this week, we will be looking at the complexities of moral reasoning. To begin, complete the interactive experiment, based on the famous Trolley Dilemma, from Philosophyexperiments.com (linked below). Be sure to keep a record of your answers as you work through the questions, and then read the analyses of your answers at the end of the experiment.

Note: The final page of this activity is titled: “Is it Because He’s Fat: A Piece of Bigotry” – you do not need to continue beyond that page.

http://www.philosophyexperiments.com/fatman/Defaul…

For your essay this week, discuss what you learned about your own moral reasoning compared with the moral reasoning of others who participated in this experiment (this will be available to you in the analysis section).

The following questions should help guide your writing:

  • In the preliminary questions, what answers did you select and why did you select them?
  • In the scenario questions, (The Runaway Train, The Fat Man on the Bridge, The Saboteur, and The Fat Man and the Ticking Bomb), what answers did you select and why did you select them?
  • In the analysis section, were your preliminary answers and your scenario answers consistent? If not, why not?
  • How do your answers compare with the answers of others who also participated in this experiment?
  • What does this experiment tell you about yourself and others in terms of moral reasoning?

Your completed assignment should be written primarily in first person and should be 500-750 words in length. If you use sources in your writing, be sure to identify them. If you use any direct language from a source, be sure to place those words in quotation marks.

Answer preview

For the first scenario, I held it right for Casey to divert the train to kill one person to save the other five. The reasoning is for morality is to maximize on the happiness of all the people involved (Stangroom, 2018). For the second scenario, the innocent fat person life is to be saved; otherwise, it would be intended murder. For the third scenario, the Saboteur should be pushed to save the lives of the five as a punishment for his intention to cause the accident. For the fourth scenario, the fat man deserves torturing as it would help reveal the location of the nuclear bomb and save the life of a million people. Torture iother majority involved.

[708 Words]

Scroll to Top