Written Presentations are brief discussions of a focused topic delivered to a group in order to impart knowledge or to stimulate discussion. Presentations are like short papers in that there is an introduction, main body and conclusion.
Presentation content shows a thorough understanding of the topic. Substantive research effort is evident. Content is accurate and sequenced in a clear, logical way.
18.75 pts
Proficient
Presentation content shows an adequate understanding of the topic. There some evidence of research. Content may contain inconsistencies or some connections made may not be supported.
12.5 pts
Marginal
Presentation content shows general understanding of the topic. There is limited evidence of research. Content contains inaccuracies, inconsistencies, misinterpretations or is somewhat unclear.
6.25 pts
Not Proficient
Presentation content shows a lack of understanding of the topic. There is inadequate evidence of research and insufficient relevant information and facts. Content is confusing and/or contains frequent inaccuracies. Content is randomly organized.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Supporting Materials
25 pts
Commendable
A variety of types of supporting materials (explanations, examples, illustrations, statistics, analogies, quotations from relevant authorities) make appropriate reference to information or analysis that significantly supports the presentation or establishes the presenter’s authority on the topic.
18.75 pts
Proficient
Some use of supporting materials (explanations, examples, illustrations, statistics, analogies, quotations from relevant authorities) make appropriate reference to information or analysis that partially supports the presentation or establishes the presenter’s authority on the topic.
12.5 pts
Marginal
Supporting materials (explanations, examples, illustrations, statistics, analogies, quotations from relevant authorities) make appropriate reference to information or analysis that generally supports the presentation or establishes the presenter’s authority on the topic.
6.25 pts
Not Proficient
Insufficient supporting materials (explanations, examples, illustrations, statistics, analogies, quotations from relevant authorities) make appropriate reference to information or analysis that minimally supports the presentation or establishes the presenter’s authority on the topic.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Speaker Credibility
25 pts
Commendable
Displays outstanding confidence, and seriousness of purpose and is highly effective in delivering a well-polished oral presentation demonstrating excellent communication skills and is within the set time limit. Preparation was strongly evident.
18.75 pts
Proficient
Displays confidence, and seriousness of purpose and is effective in delivering the oral presentation demonstrating good communication skills and is generally close to the set time limit. Preparation was evident.
12.75 pts
Marginal
Displays some confidence, and seriousness of purpose and is somewhat effective in delivering the oral presentation demonstrating average communication skills and is slightly over or under the set time limit. More preparation was needed.
6.25 pts
Not Proficient
Displays marginal confidence, and seriousness of purpose and is ineffective in delivering the oral presentation demonstrating below average communication skills and is substantially over or under the set time limit. Lack of preparation was evident.
25 pts
Activity Outcomes
Identify social justice issues in diverse and special populations.
Answer preview
Social workers may offer appropriate support to people and societies in need by using such technology in innovative ways, such as apps developed for case management, drawing up treatment protocols, and arranging evaluations (Netting et al., 2016).
There are a variety of efforts that may be implemented to solve these issues. Adopting collaboration is the first step. Collaboration may be complex, and that is probably an overstatement (Netting et al., 2016). However, it’s important to note that academic research into cooperative institutional activity in any area still reflects attempts to simplify a highly complicated collection of behaviors. When describing problematic behavior,
