This module is on the U.S. Judiciary as an institution, specifically its supremacy in interpreting the U.S. Constitution. This assignment is intended to be a reflective paper on what you have read in the fourth module of the course. The paper is to be a minimum of three and maximum of five pages in length, double-spaced, with standard margins and no cover page. Make sure you include your name and “Reflection Paper #4” on the first page of the paper. Papers are to be uploaded to Canvas. This paper is due on Monday, July 27, by 11:59 p.m. You may earn up to 150 points.
The main purpose of this assignment is for you to reflect on and express what you learned and gained from the assigned readings in Whittington’s “Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy,” and your opinion as to the validity, strengths, or weaknesses of the arguments presented. It is important that your paper is coherent, uses correct grammar, punctuation and spelling, and expresses your own conclusions and points of view. Your grade will be based on the quality of your writing, and its completeness in considering Whittington’s main conclusions and arguments. You should carefully cite any writings that are not your own. Your paper will be scanned for plagiarism.
Your grade will be based on the quality of your writing, and its completeness in considering the assigned chapters from “Judicial Supremacy.” You should consider at least the following questions:
What is Whittington’s main argument and conclusions? What are its strengths and weaknesses?
Do you agree or disagree with Whittington?
What is the interplay Whittington suggests regarding judicial power and the roles of the presidency and congress?
What did you learn about the federal judiciary, specifically the U.S. Supreme Court, that you didn’t know or consider before?
Answer preview
Whittington’s position falls short because the judiciary does not wield absolute powers in the interpretation of the constitution. The courts are bound by the law and doctrines, such as judicial restraint, that seeks to ensure that judicial officers do not overstep their mandate ( Hutt, 2017). Similarly, the courts often derive their power from the legislative instruments that created them. One may argue convincingly that judicial supremacy lies squarely within the realm of legal affairs and that political approval has little to no impact on the exercise of core court functions. The rationale for this position is that courts are guided by sound legal principles that they must adhere to rather than political considerations.
[1333 Words]
