The roles of school support staff are highly diverse. As a result, the levels of education and expertise can vary significantly among support staff. Is it reasonable and appropriate for school leaders to engage in collaborative leadership with all support staff? Why or why not?
WK3 DQ2
How powerful are support staff in projecting an image of the school to the community? Does this level of power change depending on whether the image being projected is positive or negative? Support your view.
Requirements: APA | Discussion | 1 pages, Single spaced
Answer preview
Persuasion is a powerful strategy to draw people’s attention. However, it can explain a positive or negative message to the community. When it comes to public persuasion, only the positive influence attracts the people while the negative influence discourages them. Therefore, a school must have a positive image for it to grow and have many followers. As a result, I can say that the power of support staff changes depending on whether the projected image is positive or negative. When the projected image is positive, the school is easily accepted in the community (Dos Santos, 2020). Hence, support staffs are more likely to consult school leaders in order to maintain a good reputation. For example, school leaders can consult school counselors when developing school policy against bullying. However, negative image projection reduces the power of support staff to persuade the school leaders and community. A negative image makes the community feel that the institution is not safe. Besides, school leaders might withdraw from a relationship with support staff who is not effective.
[728 Words]