This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.CriteriaExemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Criterion Score
Potential Impact: Legal, Safety, Environmental, and Financial Risks
22.5 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and incorporates specific examples to substantiate and clarify claims
20.25 points
Identifies legal, safety, environmental, and financial risks
15.75 points
Identifies legal, safety, environmental, and financial risks, but claims are not logical
0 points
Does not identify legal, safety, environmental, and financial risks
Score of Potential Impact: Legal, Safety, Environmental, and Financial Risks,/ 22.5
Influence of Society, Culture, Politics, Health, Safety and Security
22.5 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and incorporates specific examples to substantiate and clarify claims
20.25 points
Describes the influence of society, culture, politics, health, safety, and security
15.75 points
Describes the influence of society, culture, politics, health, safety, and security, but claims are not logical
0 points
Does not describe the influence of society, culture, politics, health, safety, and security
Score of Influence of Society, Culture, Politics, Health, Safety and Security,/ 22.5
Employment Laws: Identification
22.5 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and incorporates specific examples to substantiate and clarify claims
20.25 points
Identifies applicable federal laws and acts
15.75 points
Identifies federal laws and acts, but claims are not logical
0 points
Does not identify applicable federal laws and acts
Score of Employment Laws: Identification,/ 22.5
Global Market: Business Challenges When Identifying Risk
22.5 points
Meets “Proficient” criteria and incorporates specific examples to substantiate and clarify claims
20.25 points
Describes challenges in the global market that businesses face when identifying risk for forecasting
15.75 points
Describes challenges in the global market that businesses face when identifying risk for forecasting, but claims are not logical
0 points
Does not describe challenges in the global market that businesses face when identifying risk for forecasting
Score of Global Market: Business Challenges When Identifying Risk,/ 22.5
Articulation of Response
10 points
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format
9 points
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization
7 points
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
0 points
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
Score of Articulation of Response,/ 10
Rubric Total ScoreTotalScore of OL 645 Risk Management Plan Project Rubric – Phase I,/ 100Criterion score has been overridden
Overall Score
Overall Score
Exemplary86 points minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.
Proficient56 points minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.
Needs Improvement1 point minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.
Not Evident0 points minimum
Instructors should not modify this row (it will automate from the scores above). This score represents the average evaluation across all rubric criteria.
Answer preview
dimensions. According to Muratbekova-Touron (2011), French managers considered Russian culture to be a more particularistic one. Furthermore, Muratbekova-Touron (2011) established that differences existed between human nature and time dimensions. French managers perceived all these attributes as either important or highly important.
Based on the study’s findings, Muratbekova-Touron (2011) arrived at a couple of conclusions. According to Muratbekova-Touron (2011), French and Russian managers rarely use similar cultural dimensions to differentiate their cultures. Russian supervisors look at French culture to be less hierarchical and more universalistic. In contrast, French supervisors believe that Russian culture is more hierarchical and more pluralistic. Based on this, Muratbekova-Touron (2011) concluded that symmetric mutual perceptions exist when French and Russian managers differentiate their cultures. Muratbekova-Touron (2011) also concluded that French
[1302 Words]