Also, please cite at least two (2) outside sources. This assignment have to be in APA format to include separate title and reference pages. Times New Roman 12 pt font and double spacing required. You will also find a guide for your essay below.
Consider the arguments for and against exposing Stakeholders with whom you are personally close or with whom you have close professional ties. Develop a position on this issue that could serve as a guide for anyone in such a position with regard to Corporate Performance.
The critical thinking essay has you look at and contribute to a range of arguments rather than just one at a time. Critical thinking essays consider the strengths and weaknesses of various solutions to a problem or various answers to a question. It requires thinking … not information reporting.
The critical thinking essay starts with a question, not a thesis. Your essay shows how your thinking changes as you research a topic. For example, when you begin researching capital punishment, you may be in favor of the death penalty because it is a deterrent. Then you may find some studies that question whether it has a deterrent effect and that may influence your thinking. You don’t have to know what you think about your topic when you start writing your critical thinking essay.
Perhaps it is helpful to think of an essay in terms of a conversation or debate with a classmate. If you and I were discussing whether or not there should be a death penalty in the US, there would be a beginning, middle and end to our conversation. As with a conversation, your essay must be complete, and logically so, leaving no doubt as to your intent or argument.
However – again, think of this as a conversation – your essay shouldn’t be formal. Remember, you’re talking about your ideas and thought processes. Don’t try to do that in third person! To help you stay on topic, your critical thinking essay should be organized as follows.
Essay Outline
Introduction (1-2 paragraphs)
a) Focus on explaining the topic.
Body (minimum of 4-5 paragraphs but use as many as necessary. Several short paragraphs are better than 1-2 overly long paragraphs)
Write your body before your write your introduction and conclusion.
Examine all aspects of the topic. Show your knowledge and grasp of the material you have read.
a) Discuss the differing opinions of the topic as reflected in the research.
b) Discuss any issues or problems.
c) Did you have enough information?
d) Did the research raise issues you hadn’t considered?
e) Did the research contain confusing, incomplete or contradictory information?
f) Explain how your research influenced your thinking.
i) If you’re not sure about your opinion, what information might you need to form an opinion?
Conclusion (generally 1 paragraph)
a) The conclusion rounds off the essay.
b) Refer back to your main ideas or points and reiterate your answer to the question.
c) NEVER introduce new information in your conclusion.
d) The conclusion moves from specific to general.
Answer preview
From another point of view, ranting out on individuals with which one has a relationship with is not the very best thing to do. This is in consideration to the trust thrown away, the relationship destroyed and the enmity created (Vandekerckhove, 2016). Sometimes, one simply has to preserve a relationship despite the many challenges that may come as a result of this. The relationship could be beneficial to on the outside world leave alone the interests of the organization which goes ahead to justify its preservation.
In general, relationships should not come in the way of integrity. Integrity is simply the ability to stand by and for what is right. An organization has so much to lose when individuals cover up for immorality committed by others simply because it’s like the encouragement of a tumor. Eventually, the organization is disintegrated from within with the loss of its market grip and preference. However, it is of the essence that an individual protects the relationships that they make through their lifetime. This is why the protective attitude develops naturally without many efforts. In protecting these relationships, an individual is simply acting on a natural drive.
