Reflect on the past week and identify an instance where you negotiated with someone—at home, at work, or anytime you had contact with another person. For the first paragraph of your initial post, describe the negotiation event, including the participants, the key issues, and the outcome.
For the second part of your initial post, evaluate one of the following starter bullet points, using research on course concepts to inform your analysis:
Was your negotiation an example of distributive negotiation or integrative negotiation? Was each party engaged in the negotiation using the same approach? What behaviors existed that demonstrated the approach? What advantages or disadvantages might have emerged if a different approach (distributive versus integrative) had been used?
How might each party assess the outcome of the negotiation? Does each party view it as successful? What is the basis for evaluating how parties view the outcome? What did each party do to achieve success in the negotiation?
Negotiations have a reputation for being secretive actions with overtones of espionage, mistrust, and strategizing. What are the positives and negatives of sharing your strategies or your desired point of settlement with the other person in a negotiation? How did the level of secrecy or sharing impact the negotiation process and outcome in your example? What behaviors demonstrated the level of secrecy and sharing that existed?
The desired outcome in a negotiation is to achieve the goal you want. What can opposing parties in a negotiation do to identify their common points and minimize their differences? Analyze how your negotiation example might have had a better-negotiated outcome if common points had been enhanced and differences minimized during the negotiation.
Answer preview
through use of low tones and reasonable arguments since I knew that we were to be dependable on each other for a longer period since the company lacked adequate funds to purchase another computer. However, if we both used the distributive negotiation strategy, it would have ended badly for both of us. This is because distributive negotiation involves the use of personal interests without considering what the other party will lose in the process. Also, this approach requires both parties to view each other as competitors instead of collaborating towards a common interest. If I were to use the distributive strategy, I would have obtained the resource for myself by providing good advantage points and being in a better position to bargain for the resource (Warner, 2004). However, since the computer was limited, we had to agree on sharing on different time schedules.
