Regardless of political affiliation, individuals often grow concerned when considering perceived competing interests of government and their impact on topics of interest to them. The realm of healthcare is no different. Some people feel that local, state, and federal policies and legislation can be either helped or hindered by interests other than the benefit to society.
Consider for example that the number one job of a legislator is to be reelected. Cost can be measured in votes as well as dollars. Thus, it is important to consider the legislator’s perspective on either promoting or not promoting a certain initiative in the political landscape.
To Prepare:
- Review the Resources and reflect on efforts to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
- Consider who benefits the most when policy is developed and in the context of policy implementation.
By Day 3 of Week 3
Post an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voters views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. Please check your discussion grading rubric to ensure your responses meet the criteria.
–> APA format, please refer to Rubric
–> Please three current resource and use some resource provided.
http://www.senate.gov/
Answer preview
Voters are bound to respond negatively when the policies advanced by legislators harms them. Voters’ analysis will not be based on the legislators’ intentions but the perceived outcome of their policy position. Given the intricacies of changing the healthcare system, legislators who support the ACA are bound to reiterate their stance to resonate with most voters’ concerns and improve their re-election chances. On the other hand, the people who oppose the Affordable care Act are likely to take a more pragmatic approach because pushing for rapid changes on the eve of elections may be disastrous for their re-election bids.
[711 Words]
