Systematic and scientific analysis

Position Paper

Over the past five weeks you have examined several areas of psychology in relation to the areas/fields of psychology that you are most interested in. As you enter the final week of the course and potentially the end of your bachelor program you may think “what have I learned?”, not just for this course but for the program as a whole. Often, what is created toward the end of an academic program is a portfolio of work that demonstrates your academic achievements and knowledge. This assignment will take a part of that idea but within a position paper. A position paper is your synthesis of ideas and thoughts regarding psychology supported by relevant sources. The basic purpose of the paper is to answer this question:

What have I learned and how am I going to use what I learned?

The paper should adhere to the following guidelines:

  • The length of the paper should be 10–12 pages, Time New Roman double-spaced pages (not including the title and reference pages).
  • For the main sections it should have a:
  • Title page
  • Introduction
  • Literature review
  • Conclusion
  • Reference page(s)
  • The paper must use proper APA style for citing sources and references.
  • Introduction: This should be 1–2 pages in length. The introduction provides a brief overview of what will be covered and the purpose of the paper.
  • Literature review: The literature review is outside information that supports your conclusions in the next section. For this assignment you could use the articles that you had found in previous week’s assignments. There should be a minimum of 6–8 journal articles that support your writing.
  • Conclusions: The conclusion is the section that pulls it all together. It provides the reader with a better understanding of the information you presented in the earlier section as well as your views regarding the original question/purpose of the paper.
APA Style 7 and I will upload some material from this course
Answer preview
McCambridge et al. (2012) are keen to point out the willingness of stakeholders within the field to question the suitability of demand characteristics as part of a fundamental research concept. They note that previous studies vouching for demand characteristics are not robust enough because of their weak research designs or small sample sizes that they used. The rigor that the authors use to assess demand characteristics highlights the significance of research validity in advancing the field of knowledge. Psychology is a relatively young scientific area compared to more established disciplines like Physics, Chemistry, and Biology.
[3763 Words]
Systematic and scientific analysis
Scroll to Top