In 500-700 words, compose an essay addressing the following:
Based on the topics covered throughout this course, choose a specific (national or global) environmental issue impacted by the human population. Explain the issue and the impacts of humans. Give examples of how the issue affects the biological processes and ecological systems. Then, suggest sustainable practices that can be used to mediate the impacts of this issue. Be sure to include citations of reliable, scientific references to support your explanations.
Include a title page with your name, the title of the assignment, and the University.
Competency Apply duty-based ethical theories to contemporarymoralissues. Instructions In this research-basedassessment, youwill be applying a Kantianperspective to a contemporarymoralissue. Currentcontemporarymoralissuesrange from genetic en
Competency
Apply duty-based ethical theories to contemporary moral issues.
Instructions
In this research-based assessment, you will be applying a Kantian perspective to a contemporary moral issue. Current contemporary moral issues range from genetic engineering to issues related to the use of torture in wartime. For this assessment you will need to research contemporary moral issues and select one that will be the focus of your paper as you apply the Kantian perspective. Once you select your moral issue, you will need to address the following in a properly formatted research paper.
Explain what duty is according to Kant and how this view differs from other senses of duty.
Describe the relationship between a good will and duty for Kant.
How does your maxim fulfill/satisfy each of these formulations?
In your paper, ensure that you use credible academic sources, and cite them properly.
greetings, this is the rubric
Competence
Proficiency
Mastery
Not Submitted
An inadequate or inappropriate explanation of what duty is according to Kant and how this view differs from other senses of duty
Explains what duty is according to Kant and how this view differs from other senses of duty with supporting information.
Explains what duty is according to Kant and how this view differs from other senses of duty with strong supporting information.
Explains what duty is according to Kant and how this view differs from other senses of duty with well-integrated, strong supporting information.
Not Submitted
An inadequate or inappropriate description of the relationship between a good will and duty for Kant.
Describes with generalities the relationship between a good will and duty for Kant.
Adequately describes the relationship between a good will and duty for Kant.
Thoroughly describes the relationship between a good will and duty for Kant.
Not Submitted
An inadequate or inappropriate differentiation of the two formulations of the Categorical Imperative
Differentiates the two formulations of the Categorical Imperative with basic information.
Differentiates the two formulations of the Categorical Imperative with strong supporting information.
Differentiates the two formulations of the Categorical Imperative in strong detail and supporting information.
Not Submitted
Incorrectly identifies a contemporary moral issue and/or An inadequate or inappropriate discussion of how these formulations apply to the selected issue.
Correctly identifies a contemporary moral issue and discusses how these formulations apply to the selected issue with basic supporting information.
Correctly identifies a contemporary moral issue and discusses how these formulations apply to the selected issue with supporting information.
Correctly identifies a contemporary moral issue and thoroughly discusses how these formulations apply to the selected issue in strong detail and supporting information.
Not Submitted
An inadequate or inappropriate explanation of, using the foundation of Kant’s moral theory, how there is a moral duty for the selected issue.
Explains, using the foundation of Kant’s moral theory, how there is a moral duty for the selected issue with strong supporting evidence.
Explains, using the foundation of Kant’s moral theory, how there is a moral duty for the selected issue with supporting evidence.
Explains, using the foundation of Kant’s moral theory, how there is a moral duty for the selected issue with strong supporting evidence.
Not Submitted
Incorrectly creates a maxim And/or An inadequate or inappropriate explanation of how feasible is it to universalize the maxim.
Creates an applicable maxim with a sufficient explanation as to how feasible is it to universalize the maxim.
Creates an applicable maxim with a detailed explanation as to how feasible is it to universalize the maxim.
Creates an applicable maxim with a thorough and detailed explanation as to how feasible is it to universalize the maxim.
Not Submitted
An inadequate or inappropriate explanation of how maxim fulfill/satisfy each of the formulations.
Explains how maxim fulfill/satisfy each of the formulations with basic supporting evidence.
Explains how maxim fulfill/satisfy each of the formulations with supporting evidence.
Explains how maxim fulfill/satisfy each of the formulations with strong supporting evidence.
Some nurses believe that Florence Nightingale holds nursing back and represents the negative and backward elements of nursing.
Discussion question below:
1. Some nurses believe that Florence Nightingale holds nursing back and represents the negative and backward elements of nursing. This view cites as evidence that Nightingale supported the subordination of nurses to physicians, opposed registration of nurses, and did not see mental health nurses as part of the profession. After reading this chapter, what do you think? Is Nightingale relevant in the 21st century to the nursing profession? Why or why not?
Instructions:
· Follow the 3 x 3 rule: minimum three paragraphs per discussion question, with a minimum of three sentences each paragraph.
· All answers or discussions comments submitted must be in APA format.
How would you try to convince this person to examine the issue using the scientific method in order to come to clear and careful assessments?
Why would you argue for engaging scientific, peer-reviewed sources on the issue?
Requirements:
Cite all claims and ideas using scholarly sources.
Include at least one scholarly source that is not part of the required or recommended reading for this course. The CSU Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these scholarly sources.
You may wish to review the Letter Template to Public or Business Official (found in the module folder) for help formatting your essay according to the requirements. If you need assistance with your writing style or you need writing tips or tutorials, visit the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.). Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.
Clinical Judgment is the process of integrating evidence-based practice, critical-thought, the Nursing Process, knowledge, skills, and attitudes, as well as application of theory to practice in order to promote safe, quality care to clients in all setting
Clinical Judgment is the process of integrating evidence-based practice, critical-thought, the Nursing Process, knowledge, skills, and attitudes, as well as application of theory to practice in order to promote safe, quality care to clients in all settings.
Keeping that in mind, answer the following scenario:
You are the Charge Nurse in a large Urban Emergency Department (ED). You nursing staff include:
