Author name: Rosemary Mosco

Evidence-Based Project

Evidence-Based Project

Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
  • Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
  • Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
  • Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry

Create a 4- to 5-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

  • Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. This clinical issue will remain the same for the entire course and will be the basis for the development of your PICOT question
  • Describe how you used keywords to search on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
  • Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 2: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

  • The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
  • A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
  • A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

solomon.adekola@walden.edu
password is Oladammy03

https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php

You can choose to go by the following topic or come up with your own.

Nursing staff exposure to infectious diseases

PICOT Question; Among the nursing staff (P), does washing hands regularly with soap and nursing staff education (I) compared to using protective gear only (C) effective in reducing infection rates in the hospitals?

Thesis statement: Although occupational safety remains a major focus to most health organizations, the nursing staff exposure to infectious diseases remains high.

Evidence-Based Project Read More »

Collective security or a balance of power

Collective security or a balance of power

If asked to advise the president of the United States on which approach should be pursued in American foreign policy, collective security or a balance of power, what would you advise?

Explain why Collective Security forum arrangements are a better way to manage world affairs and support your argument with source-cited historical facts.

Essay – 12 point – Ariel font

No longer than a page and a half.

Collective security or a balance of power Read More »

Elderly assessment

Elderly assessment

End-of-life care becomes an issue at some point for elderly clients. Even with the emergence of palliative care programs and hospice programs, most elderly people do not die in their own home as is their preference. What are the reasons for this trend? Discuss what you can do as a nurse to support your clients regarding end-of-life care in accordance with their wishes. Support your response with evidence-based literature.

Elderly assessment Read More »

Signature assignment

Signature assignment

Develop a strategic plan of 1,050 word or more for Global Plastics, Inc. Human Resource department to address the issues Janet discovered and achieve the goals outlined in the scenario. Your strategic plan should include all elements of a strategic plan and address the following:

  • Align each of the issues with the goals in the company’s strategic plan.
  • Establish metrics to measure attainment of each of the goals.
  • Evaluate how the strategy will address each issue identified in the scenario.

Cite all sources according to APA formatting guidelines. Sources are not required, but will be accepted.

Signature assignment Read More »

AHS 8300 week 3 proposal

AHS 8300 week 3 proposal

In accordance with the guidelines provided in Week 1, you will submit a formal Thesis Proposal Outline for approval by the course instructor. The Thesis Proposal Outline is an overview of your project and is designed not only to formally announce your intentions as far as your Master’s thesis goes, but also to help you become more fluent in and informed about the topic for your project.

The Thesis Proposal Outline should be at least 7-8 double-spaced pages and include the following sections:

  1. Introduction.
  2. Statement of problem or question.
  3. Literature review.
  4. Statement of overall purpose.
  5. Chapter overviews.
  6. Explanation of limitations.
  7. Statement of project’s significance.
  8. Work plan/timeline.
  9. Bibliography

(Please note that this assignment is worth 10% of your grade for the course.)

AHS 8300 Thesis Outline Rubric (1)

AHS 8300 Thesis Outline Rubric (1)

CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSignificance of Topic
20.0 ptsMastery

Topic of major importance and specifically related to the field of study. Topic has significant theoretical and practical importance to the field of study. Topic demonstrates a high level of innovative thinking. Topic directly relates to planning, implementing, and evaluating a program.

18.0 ptsProficient

Topic is important and related to field of study. Topic will moderately add to the body of literature in the field of study. Topic has moderate theoretical and practical importance to the field of study. Topic demonstrates a moderate level on innovative thinking. Topic directly relates to planning, implementing, and evaluating a program.

16.0 ptsBasic

Topic is of some importance and is related to field of study. Topic will somewhat add to the body of literature in the field of study. Topic had basic theoretical and practical importance to the field of study. Topic demonstrates some innovative thinking. Topic somewhat relates to planning, implementing, and evaluating a program.

14.0 ptsBeginning

Topic is of little importance or unrelated to field of study. Topic will not add to the body of literature in the field of study. Topic has little theoretical or practical importance to the field of study. Topic demonstrates no innovative thinking. Topic does not directly relate to planning, implementing, and evaluating a program.

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose
20.0 ptsMastery

Clearly stated and appropriately worded. Well conceptualized.

18.0 ptsProficient

Clearly stated and appropriately worded. Moderately conceptualized.

16.0 ptsBasic

Somewhat understandable but needs clarity. Some level of conceptualization.

14.0 ptsBeginning

Unclear and confusing. No conceptualization.

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Questions / Hypothesis
20.0 ptsMastery

Clearly related to purpose and understandable. Little or no revision needed.

18.0 ptsProficient

Related purpose and understandable. Moderate revision needed.

16.0 ptsBasic

Somewhat related to purpose and understandable. Significant revision needed.

14.0 ptsBeginning

Unrelated to purpose and poorly written. Significant revision needed.

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReview of Literature / Theoretical Framework
20.0 ptsMastery

Comprehensive literature review. Includes current and landmark literature highly relevant to the topic. Establishes an advanced theoretical framework (including motivational theories) for the research topic. Is appropriate for publication or presentation with little or no revision.

18.0 ptsProficient

Complete literature review with sound organization. Includes very few non-referred sources and provides current research relevant to the field and the topic. Establishes a sound and proficient theoretical framework (including motivational theories) for the research topic. May be appropriate for publication or presentation with major or moderate revision.

16.0 ptsBasic

Partially complete and somewhat disorganized. Includes few non-refereed sources. Establishes a basic theoretical framework (including motivational theories) for the research topic. Demonstrates a basic understanding of appropriate citation format, but requires significant revision. Is not appropriate for publication or presentation without significant revision.

14.0 ptsBeginning

Incomplete or disorganized. Includes an inappropriate number of non-refereed sources. Fails to establish an appropriate theoretical framework (including motivational theories) for the research topic. Fails to site appropriately. Not appropriate for publication or presentation.

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat, Citations, & References
20.0 ptsMastery

Project is well organized, needing only very little clarification, if any. The entire project is presented in format appropriate for intended scholarly venue. Presentation of the material is highly appropriate and professional. All citations are APA appropriate. Additional sources are not needed. All citations and references are presented in proper format and do not need revision.

18.0 ptsProficient

Project is organized, but in need of major clarification in some areas. The majority of the project is presented in APA format appropriate for intended scholarly venue. Presentation of material is appropriate and professional. A high number of appropriate citations are used, Few, if any, additional sources may be needed. The Majority of citations and references are presented in proper format, and are in need of minor revision.

16.0 ptsBasic

Project is somewhat organized but in need of significant clarification. The majority of the project is not presented in APA format appropriate for intended scholarly venue. Presentation of material is somewhat appropriate and professional. A moderate number of appropriate citations are used, but more may be needed. Citations and references are not presented in proper format, and are in need of moderate revision.

14.0 ptsBeginning

Project is disorganized or difficult to read. Project is not presented in APA format appropriate for intended scholarly venue. Presentation of material is inappropriate and unprofessional. Few appropriate citations are used. Citations and references are not presented in proper format and need significant revision.

20.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0

Previous

16 hours ago

Week 3 Readings and Resources

Textbook:

  • Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association

Please read the following:

Articles:

AHS 8300 week 3 proposal Read More »

Scroll to Top