Author name: Rosemary Mosco

This paper is supposed to be about a counseling interview

This paper is supposed to be about a counseling interview

Sociology Question

Hi so this is the third paper in the class we already did two I will include them below.

This paper is supposed to be about a counseling interview with a person of choice. I will give you a name and than you can just say that you interviewed a friend. This paper has three parts to it. Each part is 2-4 pages. I want a total of 10 pages please do not do more or less. SO you have to pretend that you did an interview with that person and than write a paper based on it. The Paper has three parts and it is all explained in the prompt. In the two papers before we talked about using a theory and this theory you can use in the interview. You do not have to provide the interview itself just the three parts that are explain in the prompt. Please make sure to follow all the bullet points below each part and everything in APA and also the reference page. I will do the consent form part. For the references use the Diane Gehart book and you can use the same sources you have used in the paper before you have to have at least 5 if you want you can also find other academic sources. I will provide the link to the book.

Prompt:

Students will conduct a live mock interview with a colleague or student; record (audio or video) and write a case conceptualization paper. Students will write a theory-based case conceptualization that demonstrates their theoretical orientation and counseling skills. Students should demonstrate concepts learned throughout the program and coherently apply them to their own counseling practice. Students are expected to demonstrate an understanding of the program’s central tenets: multicultural responsiveness, social constructionist/postmodern theory, knowledge of trauma informed care and recovery movement principles.

Readings: Read articles and chapters related to counseling theory and single session interviews. Here, you may dive deeper into the research of your preferred orientation and counseling philosophy.

Instructor will be available to provide consultations, suggestions, and review student work over Zoom. The purpose of these meetings is to provide students with support, encouragement, and reflections in order to stay on track and complete the projects. They are voluntary.

Mock Interview Guidelines

You will be facilitating a one-time mock interview with a person over the age of 18. Who should you interview:

It would be useful for you to reflect on some questions you might want to ask based on your preferred theoretical orientation so that when you write your case conceptualization you have the relevant information. Imagine what may be useful to know if you are going to meet this person again and begin a collaborative helping relationship with them. Try and structure the interview so that it ends within 30-60 minutes (typical length of a regular counseling session). As this project is for a class assignment and will be audio or video recorded you will have to seek consent from your interviewee (see example “Consent form”) – both you and the interviewee must sign this form. This is NOT optional. You will submit the informed consent along with the reference page.

Since there will be no follow-up session planned, encourage the person to share something that was meaningful or important to them in the past – perhaps they can talk about a hurdle or difficulty they managed to overcome. We do not anticipate any negative effects from this conversation – in fact we hope that this will be a learning and growth experience for you and the interviewee. However, because it is impossible to know beforehand what may emerge in a conversation, make sure to check in with your interviewee periodically and at the end of the interview how the conversation is going for them. If they are impacted negatively by the conversation, provide them with information about a local counseling service or helpline.

Check in questions:

Ask periodically: How is this conversation going for you?

As you are nearing the end: Does this seem like an okay place for us to conclude this conversation? Is there anything else you would like to share about the situation that I have not asked about?

After you have ended: Do you have any comments or reflections on our conversation?

THE MAIN THREE PARTS BELOW

Case Conceptualization Requirements:

Section 1 (2-4 pages) Guidelines:

Provide a brief background of the interview.

What were you attempting to do during the interview?

Describe the core concepts and interventions of your theoretical orientation.

Describe your interventions, rationale, and the results.

How is this connected to your theory of counseling?

Be sure to reference specific portions of the interview; write at least two specific questions, comments, or responses during the interview.

Were there other possible paths the conversation could have taken?

Section 2 (2-4 pages) Guidelines:

How would trauma-informed care principles, restorative justice and/or recovery movement ideas inform how you think about your role as a counselor and the conversation that you had with the pretend counseling participant?

(my own comment: here about that part you can say that, In my trauma informed care with my Professor class I have learnt that as a counselor I am not the expert but the client is.) You can say that in some cases it is helpful to let clients also take over and find a solution) (You can google that idea further). Identify some ideas from trauma informed and restorative justice that are connecting to you as the role of a counselor)

Describe any possible ethical and legal issues. No need to go through the process of resolving the possible ethical or legal issue.

Discuss any referrals and consultations that would be helpful if needed.

Section 3 (2-4 pages) Guidelines:

Situate Yourself: How do your own beliefs, background and priorities affect the way that you are thinking about this conversation?

Situate yourself vis-a-vis your own experience—how does it relate or not relate to your own lived experiences?

How does your own social and political location related to your gender, sexual orientation, class, race-ethnicity, citizenship status and/or ability capacities influence your “reading” of the topic? In what ways do your privileges impact how you are constructing meaning and knowledge?

(My own comment: I am a Middle Eastern female who is an immigrant in the US, I always dreamt of education because in my culture girls become housewives and so on.) You can say that even I was raised a certain way this does not affect any counseling conversation I have I try not to bias and so on. So I am female, straight, lower to middle class, middle eastern and so on. for more information let me know.

Appendices

1.Reference Page: If needed, continue adding more sources to your reference page. Draw upon and cite at least 5 different significant or primary sources. You may incorporate resources or writings from previous modules, lectures, and excerpts of your work from prior courses. You should utilize appropriate graduate-level material from research articles and books. Textbooks can provide you with a helpful overview to think about a topic, however, you should seek out and utilize primary sources for your paper.

2.Signed Consent Form: Submit a copy from your interview informed consent:

The paper should balance your own reflections with the literature/research; be sure to include citations and maintain connections with the authors.

Requirements: 9-10 pages

paper 1 paper 2 book provided

This paper is supposed to be about a counseling interview Read More »

Importance of being a global citizen

Importance of being a global citizen

Prepare:

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read the A Model of Global Citizenship: Antecedents and Outcomes article and watch the Globalization at a Crossroads (Links to an external site.) video. Go to the Ashford University Library and locate one additional source on global citizenship that will help support your viewpoint, or you may choose one of the following articles found in the Week 1 Required Resources:

Reflect: Please take some time to reflect on how the concept of global citizenship has shaped your identity and think about how being a global citizen has made you a better person in your community.

Write: Use the Week 1 Example Assignment Guide download when addressing the following prompts:

  • Describe and explain a clear distinction between “globalism” and “globalization” after viewing the video and reading the article.
  • Describe how being a global citizen in the world of advanced technology can be beneficial to your success in meeting your personal, academic, and professional goals.
  • Explain why there has been disagreement between theorists about the definition of global citizenship and develop your own definition of global citizenship after reading the article by Reysen and Katzarska-Miller.
  • Choose two of the six outcomes of global citizenship from the article (i.e., intergroup empathy, valuing diversity, social justice, environmental sustainability, intergroup helping, and the level of responsibility to act for the betterment of this world).
    • Explain why those two outcomes are the most important in becoming a global citizen compared to the others.
  • Describe at least two personal examples or events in your life that illustrate the development of global citizenship based on the two outcomes you chose.
  • Identify two specific general education courses.
    • Explain how each course influenced you to become a global citizen.

The Importance of Becoming a Global Citizen

Requirements: 750 to 1,000 words   |   .doc file

Importance of being a global citizen Read More »

a short summary of how to best use social media in recruiting

a short summary of how to best use social media in recruiting

Kimberly and Dana are asked to visit the corporate headquarters to meet with the company’s Vice President for HR, Kathleen Bandy, and the staffing director, Matt Hayes.

“CapraTek needs new IT programs and products, and we need new people to develop them. Kimberly, your team will be responsible for recruiting 20 new employees. The programs will require employees from several different disciplines within IT.” Matt added. “I realize that this will add to your team’s workload, but it will be for the good of the company.”

Kimberly believes the team can handle this task, but realizes it may slow down some other aspects of her work. After they get back to their office, Kimberly and Dana talk.

“Dana, how can we organize our priorities to support the new major responsibilities we have been given? I have some ideas, but we will have to move some areas to a lower priority.”

“It is best if we think this through and come up with a plan before we make any changes. I have had to deal with competing priorities when I ran a retail store. I have some ideas about how to manage the challenge.”

This week, Kimberly and Dana begin assessing their current strategies for recruiting, retaining, and managing talent. You will help them tweak the strategies that are working so that they work better, and you will help them come up with new strategies as well.

Not long ago, while attending their local SHRM chapter meeting, Kimberly and Dana heard several of the other members share the challenges they were facing in sourcing information technology professionals. They were hoping to get someone to speak to the chapter about the challenges and best practices for recruiting employees in high tech. Kimberly and Dana decided to jump into this project, working on it most afternoons of the week if the pace of their regular work allows. Since they are also working on the strategy for recruiting, talent management, and employee retention, they plan to hire a temporary employee who is retired but wants to come back to help for a few months. Things are really picking up, and the team can see how their important work can directly influence the future of the organization.

Resources

To help Kimberly and Dana as they work to recruit the IT professionals needed for the new research and development branch, use the following resources to explore options:

Social Media in Recruiting

Koch, T., Gerber, C., & de Klerk, J.,J. (2018). The impact of social media on recruitment: Are you LinkedIn? SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 1–14.

O’Connor, J. (2019, 03). Recruiting strategies for social media. Talent Acquisition Excellence Essentials, 1–2.

Internet Recruiting

Leong, C. (2018). Technology & recruiting 101: How it works and where it’s going. Strategic HR Review, 17(1), 50–52.

Online Applicant Assessment

Kulkarni, S. B., & Che, X. (2019). Intelligent software tools for recruiting. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 28(2), 2–16.

Dane’s Challenge: How HR Professionals Guide Supervisors in the Recruiting and Selection Process

Introduction

Dane is a Data Scientist working in the CapraTek research and development (R&D) division. Dane has three new team leaders who will have four new teammates each. Two of the new team leaders are being supportive and cooperative in the process of developing a job announcement that Kimberly and Dana need to go forward in the recruiting process. One teammate is not. Calvin has prepared extensive, detailed work competencies that are very difficult for fellow IT peers to understand, and even harder for the HR staff to understand. Calvin said that these materials are essential for a successful set of hires. Dane is the supervisor, and he does not understand the material. Calvin works very hard and is currently doing the work of multiple employees.

HR Consultation

In Dane’s Challenge: Part 1, consider how Dane consults with our HR professionals, Kimberly and Dana, on how to respond to the situation with Calvin and the list of work competencies that are so unique, even he does not understand the level of technical detail.

Create a short summary of how to best use social media in recruiting, internet recruiting, and online applicant assessment to recruit applicants for the new department in the new research and development branch. You can use the materials provided and also use other peer-reviewed or trade publication sources.

a short summary of how to best use social media in recruiting Read More »

Option #2: Bernie Madoff Reference the Madoff 10 Years Later: Ep. 1 | Madoff Behind Bards (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.) video. A Ponzi scheme occurs when a fraudster uses deposits of new investors to pay off previous investors; no real investing is happening. A Ponzi scheme will collapse if new clients don’t invest, or their investments are too small to fund a decent return to previous investors. Ponzi schemes are based on trust and greed. The fraudster develops trust by building a relationship with the investors. The fraudster usually gains trust through their actions, their professional, social, or religious affiliations, and personal references. Fraudsters exploit the greed of their investors, who see a chance to obtain higher returns than usual. Because the investors trust the fraudster, they do not perform their normal due diligence. In March 2009, Madoff pled guilty to 11 federal crimes and acknowledged turning his broker-dealer business into a substantial Ponzi scheme that defrauded investors out of billions. Federal investigators believe that the fraud began as early as the 1980s and the whole thing was possibly never legitimate. The fraud totaled almost $65. On June 29, 2009, Madoff was sentenced to the maximum 150 years. In 2021, he died in prison. Madoff was once the chair of NASDAQ and often spoke about the securities industry on CNBC. Madoff took advantage of his connections in the investment community and made it seem like it was an honor to invest with him. A Ponzi scheme can only work if plenty of funds are brought in year after year to pay off previous past investors; as such, Ponzi schemes grow exponentially until they collapse. Until that collapse, Madoff had a luxurious lifestyle. Madoff pulled this off by omitting all the transactions from his formal books. He hired a CPA firm to audit the books, but that audit didn’t really occur. In fact, the CPA was violating independence requirements by being an investor in the fund himself. For a fund of its size, it would normally be audited by a very large, high-quality audit firm. The investors were greedy and enjoyed the higher returns instead. They trusted Madoff, so they didn’t perform the typical due diligence with a verifiable external audit. It is alleged (as reported on a CNBC Primetime Special) that one of Madoff’s investors was with the Russian mob and Madoff chose to turn himself in and plead guilty because he feared for both his life and that of his sons. Many have speculated that his sons helped him orchestrate the fraud: both died within a few years of the fraud being revealed. As a result of this fraud, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) began requiring broker-dealers to obtain audits using firms registered with the PCAOB, and the PCAOB now sets standards for audits of broker-dealers. Required: Please respond to the following questions: How would you describe a Ponzi scheme? What are some other examples of this type of scheme outside of this case? Describe the essential elements of the Bernie Madoff fraud. What made it so effective? Is this fraud primarily a case of asset misappropriation or fraudulent financial reporting? Explain the reason for your answer. Do you believe the PCAOB actions, in this case, will keep this from occurring in the future? Explain. Your written response paper should be 3-4 pages in length. Please type your paper in a Word document and follow APA format, according to CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.). Include a title page and reference page. Use two (2) outside academic sources other than the textbook, course materials, or additional information provided as part of the course materials. Requirements: 3-4 Pages not counting reference or cover page

Option #2: Bernie Madoff

Reference the Madoff 10 Years Later: Ep. 1 | Madoff Behind Bards (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.) video.

A Ponzi scheme occurs when a fraudster uses deposits of new investors to pay off previous investors; no real investing is happening. A Ponzi scheme will collapse if new clients don’t invest, or their investments are too small to fund a decent return to previous investors.

Ponzi schemes are based on trust and greed. The fraudster develops trust by building a relationship with the investors. The fraudster usually gains trust through their actions, their professional, social, or religious affiliations, and personal references. Fraudsters exploit the greed of their investors, who see a chance to obtain higher returns than usual. Because the investors trust the fraudster, they do not perform their normal due diligence.

In March 2009, Madoff pled guilty to 11 federal crimes and acknowledged turning his broker-dealer business into a substantial Ponzi scheme that defrauded investors out of billions. Federal investigators believe that the fraud began as early as the 1980s and the whole thing was possibly never legitimate. The fraud totaled almost $65. On June 29, 2009, Madoff was sentenced to the maximum 150 years. In 2021, he died in prison.

Madoff was once the chair of NASDAQ and often spoke about the securities industry on CNBC. Madoff took advantage of his connections in the investment community and made it seem like it was an honor to invest with him. A Ponzi scheme can only work if plenty of funds are brought in year after year to pay off previous past investors; as such, Ponzi schemes grow exponentially until they collapse. Until that collapse, Madoff had a luxurious lifestyle.

Madoff pulled this off by omitting all the transactions from his formal books. He hired a CPA firm to audit the books, but that audit didn’t really occur. In fact, the CPA was violating independence requirements by being an investor in the fund himself. For a fund of its size, it would normally be audited by a very large, high-quality audit firm. The investors were greedy and enjoyed the higher returns instead. They trusted Madoff, so they didn’t perform the typical due diligence with a verifiable external audit.

It is alleged (as reported on a CNBC Primetime Special) that one of Madoff’s investors was with the Russian mob and Madoff chose to turn himself in and plead guilty because he feared for both his life and that of his sons. Many have speculated that his sons helped him orchestrate the fraud: both died within a few years of the fraud being revealed. As a result of this fraud, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) began requiring broker-dealers to obtain audits using firms registered with the PCAOB, and the PCAOB now sets standards for audits of broker-dealers.

Required:

Please respond to the following questions:

  1. How would you describe a Ponzi scheme? What are some other examples of this type of scheme outside of this case?
  2. Describe the essential elements of the Bernie Madoff fraud. What made it so effective?
  3. Is this fraud primarily a case of asset misappropriation or fraudulent financial reporting? Explain the reason for your answer.
  4. Do you believe the PCAOB actions, in this case, will keep this from occurring in the future? Explain.

Your written response paper should be 3-4 pages in length. Please type your paper in a Word document and follow APA format, according to CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.). Include a title page and reference page. Use two (2) outside academic sources other than the textbook, course materials, or additional information provided as part of the course materials.

Requirements: 3-4 Pages not counting reference or cover page

Option #2: Bernie Madoff Reference the Madoff 10 Years Later: Ep. 1 | Madoff Behind Bards (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.) video. A Ponzi scheme occurs when a fraudster uses deposits of new investors to pay off previous investors; no real investing is happening. A Ponzi scheme will collapse if new clients don’t invest, or their investments are too small to fund a decent return to previous investors. Ponzi schemes are based on trust and greed. The fraudster develops trust by building a relationship with the investors. The fraudster usually gains trust through their actions, their professional, social, or religious affiliations, and personal references. Fraudsters exploit the greed of their investors, who see a chance to obtain higher returns than usual. Because the investors trust the fraudster, they do not perform their normal due diligence. In March 2009, Madoff pled guilty to 11 federal crimes and acknowledged turning his broker-dealer business into a substantial Ponzi scheme that defrauded investors out of billions. Federal investigators believe that the fraud began as early as the 1980s and the whole thing was possibly never legitimate. The fraud totaled almost $65. On June 29, 2009, Madoff was sentenced to the maximum 150 years. In 2021, he died in prison. Madoff was once the chair of NASDAQ and often spoke about the securities industry on CNBC. Madoff took advantage of his connections in the investment community and made it seem like it was an honor to invest with him. A Ponzi scheme can only work if plenty of funds are brought in year after year to pay off previous past investors; as such, Ponzi schemes grow exponentially until they collapse. Until that collapse, Madoff had a luxurious lifestyle. Madoff pulled this off by omitting all the transactions from his formal books. He hired a CPA firm to audit the books, but that audit didn’t really occur. In fact, the CPA was violating independence requirements by being an investor in the fund himself. For a fund of its size, it would normally be audited by a very large, high-quality audit firm. The investors were greedy and enjoyed the higher returns instead. They trusted Madoff, so they didn’t perform the typical due diligence with a verifiable external audit. It is alleged (as reported on a CNBC Primetime Special) that one of Madoff’s investors was with the Russian mob and Madoff chose to turn himself in and plead guilty because he feared for both his life and that of his sons. Many have speculated that his sons helped him orchestrate the fraud: both died within a few years of the fraud being revealed. As a result of this fraud, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) began requiring broker-dealers to obtain audits using firms registered with the PCAOB, and the PCAOB now sets standards for audits of broker-dealers. Required: Please respond to the following questions: How would you describe a Ponzi scheme? What are some other examples of this type of scheme outside of this case? Describe the essential elements of the Bernie Madoff fraud. What made it so effective? Is this fraud primarily a case of asset misappropriation or fraudulent financial reporting? Explain the reason for your answer. Do you believe the PCAOB actions, in this case, will keep this from occurring in the future? Explain. Your written response paper should be 3-4 pages in length. Please type your paper in a Word document and follow APA format, according to CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.). Include a title page and reference page. Use two (2) outside academic sources other than the textbook, course materials, or additional information provided as part of the course materials. Requirements: 3-4 Pages not counting reference or cover page Read More »

Scroll to Top