English

After reading about conclusions in the Activity titled “Conclusion,

After reading about conclusions in the Activity titled “Conclusion,

Information Discussion

After reading about conclusions in the Activity titled “Conclusion,” find a scholarly article and pay particular attention to its conclusion. Does it meet the requirements of a conclusion according to this Activity? Why or why not? Please provide examples. What steps would you take to improve the conclusion?

Conclusion

Introduction

The conclusion of your literature review should provide a synthesis of all the research you have done so that your reader understands the state of the field or topic. It is also an opportunity to provide your readers with a sense of closure. This section discusses how to effectively conclude your literature review.

Conclusions generally consist of a restatement of your thesis or main idea and a reminder of your work’s significance. Recall that your introductions typically began at a more general level than your research’s limited topic but that you moved from that general, attention-grabbing information, to a specific research question. Your conclusion generally moves in the reverse direction, beginning with the specific points of your argument, and then transitions back out to the larger topic.

In transitioning to the larger stakes of your project, you might address what further research is necessary for a fuller answer to your research question or opposing viewpoints that you do not otherwise address. However, if you use either of these methods for transitioning in your conclusion to the broader topic your research informs, be sure to do so strategically. What you want to avoid is raising any new topics or new questions that your work does not address, as doing so will make your research seem unfinished.

The conclusion of your literature review must achieve closure, a sense that the project is finished. In literature, closure is often achieved through repetition, and so repeating our thesis statements, in new words of course, helps the reader begin to feel closure. The power of repetition to make us feel something is done is most apparent in short poems. Think of something like “Roses are red, violets are blue. Here is a valentine, because I love you.” The rhyme of blue and you create an aural repetition that confers a sense of closure. Compare the sense of ending you have at the final “you” to the suspended feeling after “valentine.” Another example of repetition creating a sense of closure is in closing potentially infinite lists. Think, for example, of a list like “I hate you because…” This list could include almost any attribute. “I hate you because you are tall, because you made fun of my brother, because you are a phony, etc.” If you append a sentence at the end like, “And that is why I hate you,” our expectation becomes that no more items will follow, even though nothing logically demands that the list closed. Part of what confers closure in this longer list is the break that the return to the big picture enacts. Similarly, with your literature review, and because the conclusion follows the last paragraph of your body in which you describe your research and delve into details, returning to the bigger stakes of your research question will seem like a noticeable change in topic. This, in turn, breaks the expectation for additional body paragraphs.

-Post adds value by raising novel points or providing new perspectives.

-Post is concise and clearly written in an academic tone; Sentences are complete; spelling, grammar and punctuation are correct.

Requirements: More than 15 characters. less than 4000 characters

After reading about conclusions in the Activity titled “Conclusion, Read More »

Information Savvy: Synthesizing Information

Information Savvy: Synthesizing Information

Information Discussion

After watching the video in the Activity “Information Savvy: Synthesizing Information,” think about a time where you have synthesized information to come up with your own conclusion. Explain the process you went through. How does your process compare or contrast to the information about synthesis given in the video? Provide specific examples from the video to support your response. How would you use this experience to synthesize information in future papers? Please explain in your own words.

Information Savvy: Synthesizing Information

Introduction

In this Learning Activity, you will watch a short video. The video provides a brief explanation of and introduction to synthesis.

(GCFLearnFree.org, 2012)

-Post adds value by raising novel points or providing new perspectives.

-Post is concise and clearly written in an academic tone; Sentences are complete; spelling, grammar and punctuation are correct.

Requirements: More than 15 characters, Less than 4000 characters

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dEGoJdb6O0

Information Savvy: Synthesizing Information Read More »

After reading about conclusions in the Activity titled “Conclusion,

After reading about conclusions in the Activity titled “Conclusion,

Information Discussion

After reading about conclusions in the Activity titled “Conclusion,” find a scholarly article and pay particular attention to its conclusion. Does it meet the requirements of a conclusion according to this Activity? Why or why not? Please provide examples. What steps would you take to improve the conclusion?

Conclusion

Introduction

The conclusion of your literature review should provide a synthesis of all the research you have done so that your reader understands the state of the field or topic. It is also an opportunity to provide your readers with a sense of closure. This section discusses how to effectively conclude your literature review.

Conclusions generally consist of a restatement of your thesis or main idea and a reminder of your work’s significance. Recall that your introductions typically began at a more general level than your research’s limited topic but that you moved from that general, attention-grabbing information, to a specific research question. Your conclusion generally moves in the reverse direction, beginning with the specific points of your argument, and then transitions back out to the larger topic.

In transitioning to the larger stakes of your project, you might address what further research is necessary for a fuller answer to your research question or opposing viewpoints that you do not otherwise address. However, if you use either of these methods for transitioning in your conclusion to the broader topic your research informs, be sure to do so strategically. What you want to avoid is raising any new topics or new questions that your work does not address, as doing so will make your research seem unfinished.

The conclusion of your literature review must achieve closure, a sense that the project is finished. In literature, closure is often achieved through repetition, and so repeating our thesis statements, in new words of course, helps the reader begin to feel closure. The power of repetition to make us feel something is done is most apparent in short poems. Think of something like “Roses are red, violets are blue. Here is a valentine, because I love you.” The rhyme of blue and you create an aural repetition that confers a sense of closure. Compare the sense of ending you have at the final “you” to the suspended feeling after “valentine.” Another example of repetition creating a sense of closure is in closing potentially infinite lists. Think, for example, of a list like “I hate you because…” This list could include almost any attribute. “I hate you because you are tall, because you made fun of my brother, because you are a phony, etc.” If you append a sentence at the end like, “And that is why I hate you,” our expectation becomes that no more items will follow, even though nothing logically demands that the list closed. Part of what confers closure in this longer list is the break that the return to the big picture enacts. Similarly, with your literature review, and because the conclusion follows the last paragraph of your body in which you describe your research and delve into details, returning to the bigger stakes of your research question will seem like a noticeable change in topic. This, in turn, breaks the expectation for additional body paragraphs.

-Post adds value by raising novel points or providing new perspectives.

-Post is concise and clearly written in an academic tone; Sentences are complete; spelling, grammar and punctuation are correct.

Requirements: More than 15 characters. less than 4000 characters

After reading about conclusions in the Activity titled “Conclusion, Read More »

Ethics and Social Discussion 1

Ethics and Social Discussion 1

After reading the case in the Activity “Something’s Rotten in Hondo,” provide an example of an ethical dilemma you have encountered in your professional life. Using the theories and suggestions from the reading, compare and contrast the way you approached your dilemma to the way Bill handled the ethical dilemma in the case study. What was the outcome regarding your dilemma and what, if any, suggestions from the reading would you employ next time? Do you agree or disagree with the way Bill handled his situation? Please illustrate your response with examples from the reading.

Something’s Rotten in Hondo

Introduction

In this scenario, George, the plant manager, must make a decision about how to handle air contamination caused by the plant where he works. What would you do if you were George? Which ethical decision making rule would you apply to help guide your decision? Why?

Hondo Mini-Case

http://public.tepper.cmu.edu/ethics/AA/mgmt05-case…

Requirements: More than 15 characters, Less than 4000 characters

-Post adds value by raising novel points or providing new perspectives.

-Post is concise and clearly written in an academic tone; Sentences are complete; spelling, grammar and punctuation are correct.

Ethics and Social Discussion 1 Read More »

Quantitative Literacy Discussion

Quantitative Literacy Discussion

Refer back to the Learning Activities titled “A Formula for Permutations” and “A Formula for Combinations.” Explain how the Fundamental Counting Principle is used each time the Permutation Formula (nPr) or the Combination Formula (nCr) is applied. Would these be considered independent or dependent events? Or, is it inappropriate to be concerned about whether it is independent/dependent? Explain your thinking on the question.

A Formula for Permutations

Introduction

Formulas can be a very efficient way of solving problems. For the permutation formula introduced in this section, identify all the relevant variables. How does the formula function? How does it align to other methods of solving permutation problems?

Max needs to figure out how many possible route options he has going from one city to another on his two-week vacation in Europe. He has 10 cities on his itinerary and would like to visit at least three of them. How many possible route options does Max have, if he goes to three of the 10 cities during his vacation?

Now suppose there are 10 locations and only three stops can be made over a given time period. In this case, how many ordered three-stop routes out of 10 possible stops can be considered? We could use the method:

, or we can use the permutation rule where k items are to be selected from n available items. When order matters, this idea is notated where

nPk=n!(n−k)!

To solve this particular routing problem, use n = 10 and k = 3.

That is, out of 10 locations, there are 720 possible three-location routes.

Note: A permutation function is included on most modern scientific calculators. You may find it in the menu of functions under “probability.”

Moreover, you can see that this does conform to the fundamental counting principle. There are 10 locations to choose from for the first stop, then nine for the second, and eight for the third.

Try This!

A company employs 24 engineers, and an event requires four 15-minute presentations given by engineers. How many different lineups for presentations are possible?

(c) Thinkstock

Solution: Here we need to select four engineers out of 24, where order is relevant. Therefore, we will use the permutation rule,

 

where n = 24 and r = 4.

Answer: 255,024 lineups

Permutations

The following video tutorial explains how to evaluate factorials, use permutations to solve problems, and determine the number of permutations with indistinguishable items.

 

(Mathispower4u, 2010)

 

Requirements: More than 15 characters, less than 4000 characters

Quantitative Literacy Discussion Read More »

Scroll to Top