English

Ethics around the globe . 1520-01 module 4.

Ethics around the globe . 1520-01 module 4.

  1. Competency

    Utilize virtue and character-based ethical theories in case studies.

    Instructions

    For this assessment, you will get the chance to highlight your creative writing skills and your knowledge surrounding Aristotle. Be the Best You, is a career coaching and mentorship agency that works with employees to not only achieve their professional goals, but their personal goals as well. By using a virtue and character-based approach. As a coach for Be the Best You, you are part of the training committee that creates new training material for the clientele. The agency is seeking 3 new training sessions related to the golden mean, Aristotelian friendship, and eudemonia. Part of these trainings include scenarios that the clientele read and then answer applicable questions. You will be creating three, fully developed scenarios for the golden mean, Aristotelian friendship, and eudemonia.Your submission, in its final state will include 3 scenarios including 1 for the golden mean, 1 Aristotelian friendship, and 1 for eudemonia. For each scenario, include 3 questions, 9 in total.

    Each scenario must include:
    • A fully developed fictional scenario that clearly highlights which of the three (the golden mean, Aristotelian friendship, and eudemonia) is being presented. Clearly define the characters and the actions that are representative of the selected topic.
    • Three, open-ended questions pertaining to the scenario that the clientele would answer in relation to the facts and the topic of the scenario.

Ethics around the globe . 1520-01 module 4. Read More »

CONCEPT PAPER: LITERATURE REVIEW ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS Inbox

CONCEPT PAPER: LITERATURE REVIEW ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

Question Description: CONCEPT PAPER: LITERATURE REVIEW ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
You will write a 14–16-page literature review in current Turabian format, based on the literature
included in your annotated bibliography, that explores existing literature related to your proposed
research topic, identifying the central insights, themes, and/or gaps that support your research
proposal.
INSTRUCTIONS
Items to include are outlined as follows:
 The literature review should be 14-16 pages in length.
 The literature review should be written in current Turabian format.
 The literature review should cite at least 30 sources (these should be the same included in
the annotated bibliography assignment, though it is acceptable to include more sources
than were included in that assignment).
 The literature review should:
o Explore common themes, assumptions, or approaches in the sources you cover;
o Assess common weaknesses or limitations in the sources you cover;
o Identify implications of your Literature Assessment for your future research.
 Are there common sources you see cited across this literature that seem to be highly
influential and worth your attention?
 Are there common conclusions in this literature about future research that might be
warranted?
 Are there common errors or oversights that may need to be corrected?
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

CONCEPT PAPER: LITERATURE REVIEW ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS Inbox Read More »

ANT 2000 Any primates (chimpanzees)

ANT 2000 Any primates (chimpanzees)

For this assignment you are to write a 5-page paper on an anthropological topic of your choice. 5 pages of information plus a cover page and references cited page. The topic is about Primates ( chimpanzees )

Paper must be in APA format, 12 point font double -spaced, left-justified, spelling and grammar checked, references cited page. Use proper, APA in-text formatted citations. You may include pictures, maps, timelines as attachments at the end if they help explain your topic.

Requirements:

ANT 2000 Any primates (chimpanzees) Read More »

Analyze and contrast the Introduction and Literature Review Inbox

Analyze and contrast the Introduction and Literature Review

Macro Economics Question

Week 3 Assignment

Please analyze and contrast the Introduction and Literature Review of the articles below. All Articles can be found in EBSCO.

Briggeman, J. (2013). Paul Krugman. Econ Journal Watch, 10(3), 400–410. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=94876820&site=ehost-live&authtype=uid&user=grantham&password=Research1951!

What’s Wrong with Economics: A Discussion Between Paul Krugman and Jeff Madrick. (2015). Challenge (05775132), 58(2), 112–134.

Cochrane, J. H. (2011). How Did Paul Krugman Get It so Wrong? Economic Affairs, 31(2), 36–40.

You are expected to critically evaluate the three articles provided, identify themes and gaps, then synthesize what you have learned, keeping in mind Krugman’s economic impact. The paper should be a minimum of 1500 words in APA format.

Requirements: 1500 words APA

Analyze and contrast the Introduction and Literature Review Inbox Read More »

Scroll to Top