In a 3-page paper, written in APA format using proper spelling/grammar, conduct research on the topic of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and address the following: Explain the primary responsibilities and priorities of the IRB. Identify an organiza
In a 3-page paper, written in APA format using proper spelling/grammar, conduct research on the topic of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and address the following:
Identify an organization, such as a research hospital or pharmaceutical company, that involves human research subjects including all of the following at-risk populations:
no plagiarize, spell check, and check your grammar. Please use the references below.
Counseling Efficacy Research Paper – Final Paper (35 percent) Students will conduct a review of the research on the efficacy of foundational counseling skills. This review should focus on the findings on the efficacy of the counseling relationship, as well as the efficacy of various components of the therapeutic process, including the skills discussed in this class. The findings of the student’s research will be summarized within the final paper. At the conclusion of the summary, the student will write a written reflection connecting the efficacy research to their experience in the class. This paper should be 7 pages and adhere to APA guidelines. References should be primarily derived from counseling sources (i.e. counseling journals and texts).
Caldwell, S., Wusik, K., He, H., Yager, G., & Atzinger, C. (2018). Development and Validation of the Genetic Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale (GCSES). Journal of Genetic Counseling, 27(5), 1248–1257. https://doi-org.proxy-library.ashford.edu/10.1007/…
Rabaino, A., Donohue, K., Richards, D., & Kalas, K. (2017). Improving Trainee Counseling Self-Efficacy: The Influence of Personal Adjustment Variables. Journal of Behavioral & Social Sciences, 4(1), 41–47.
Yedemie, Y. Y. (2020). Evaluating the Influence of Self-Efficacy, Trepidation of Stigma, and Previous Counseling Experience on University Students’ Attitudes Toward Psychological and Social Counseling: Implications for Intervention. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 40(2), 115.
Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part I
Prewriting Due Week 3 and worth 30 points
When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking by playing the “Believing Game.” The Believing Game is about making the effort to “believe” – or at least consider – the reasons for an opposing view on an issue.
The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.
In Part I of the assignment (due Week 3), you will first read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes: “The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” at http://www.procon.org/sourcefiles/believinggame.pdf. Next, you will review the Procon.org Website in order to gather information. Then, you will engage in prewriting to examine your thoughts.
Note: In Part II of the assignment (due Week 5), you will write an essay geared towards synthesizing your ideas.
Part I – Prewriting: Follow the instructions below for this prewriting activity. Use complete sentences and adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
Select one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website and state your position on the issue.
From the Procon.org Website, identify three (3) premises (reasons) listed under either the Pro or Con section – whichever section opposes your position.
For each of the three (3) premises (reasons) that oppose your position on the issue, answer these “believing” questions suggested by Elbow:
What’s interesting or helpful about this view?
What would I notice if I believed this view?
In what sense or under what conditions might this idea be true?”
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.
This prewriting assignment has no page requirement. There is no requirement at this time to include references in the assignment.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language.
Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic.
EpicQuest # 2 – Essay # 2 – The WaysWeLieEssaySuggestedDueDate: 11:59PM – Sunday05thApril2020 An Electroniccopy of EpicQuest – Essay # 2 – FinalDraft – must be submitted to the plagiarismchecker. Students benefit from a minimum of 6-paragraph structure, but you’re welcome to add more.
e grading rubric provided. Format Requirements: 1,500 to 2,000 words, MLA format. Writing Requirements: Must meet academic writing standards. Papers should clearly state the significance of the topic, and be organized with adequate detail. Work Cited Page is required.
Essay Structure Requirements:
INTROUCTION PARAGRAPH: introduction paragraph with a hook, title of the reading, the author of the reading, publication the article appears in, explanation of what is the author’s main claim (what is their argument), explanation of the reading, and a clear thesis.
BODY PARAGRAPHS: Detailed supporting paragraphs started by topic sentences, and an adequate concluding paragraph. Each supporting paragraph must focus on only one aspect, trait, reason or point. Create detailed illustrations so your reader can “see” what’s going on. YOUR BODY PARAGRAPHS MUST INCLUDE SUPPORT FROM THE ASSIGNED READING. You must explain the Rhetorical Strategy the Author is using after you have incorporated the quote and how that strategy works on the reader. You can use “I” statements (this is a personal essay).
CONCLUSION: Full conclusion that ties up your essay. Purpose: to write an essay that analyzes the assigned text. Audience: your classmates, instructors, and people unfamiliar with the topic.
Crane 2 Length: 1,500 to 2,000 words. THE WORK CITED PAGE DOES NOT COUNT AS A PAGE. PROMPT: Is Lying a Good or Bad thing? Explain your reasoning. Your answer to this will form your Thesis Statement. You will develop your argument in at least the first three body paragraphs of your essay. Your last body paragraph must be a counter argument to your argument and must include a rebuttal. What is a counter argument that can be used against your position? Your counter argument must have a rebuttal (Your counter argument – rebuttal should be together in one paragraph – there should be a quote included. This paragraph should be the last paragraph before your conclusion. For this essay you should present at least three clear topics or opinions (each topic or opinion should be its own paragraph –
so this essay MUST BE a minimum of 6 paragraphs in total – (the counter argument is included as one of these topics). Explain your answers and support with examples from any of the article I have assigned. You must use the Assigned Reading in all your body paragraphs. You are only allowed one quote per body paragraph (maximum of 3 to 4 lines) – NO block quotes are allowed. The quote you use should support your position. You are not expected to conduct ANY research and you cannot add your own materials. This essay should include personal opinions, previous experience and observations to support your thesis.
GCU ELM 480 Clinical Field Experience A: Using Technology and Media in the Classroom
Clinical Field Experience A: Using Technology and Media in the Classroom
Using technology-based resources within the English language arts classroom supports real-world applications and helps to inspire teachers in their lesson planning and instructional practices. Continually exploring technology resources that can be utilized within the classroom demonstrates a teaching best practice.
Allocate at least 4 hours in the field to support this field experience.
Observe an English language arts lesson taught by a certified K-8 teacher that integrates educational technology to enhance instruction. During the observation, take note of how technology was used and its effectiveness.
Following your observation, collaborate with your mentor teacher to discuss the integration of technology in the ELA classroom. Specifically discuss with your mentor teacher his or her practices related to ensuring the safe, legal, and ethical use of technology in the classroom.
Use any remaining field experience hours to assist the teacher in providing instruction and support to the class.
In 500-750 words, reflect on your observation and discussion by addressing the following:
During the lesson you observed, what technology resources did your mentor teacher use?
Describe the ways in which the observed technology positively or negatively contributed to instruction and engagement.
What specific additional technology could have been used within the lesson and how would you have used them?
How does your mentor teacher ensure the safe, legal, and ethical use of technology and information accessed from the technological resources?
Explain how you will use your findings related to the use of technology in ELA instruction in your future professional practice.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
