Suppose you were able to choose three fossils to extract DNA from and your goal was to test the hypothesis that completely modern humans evolved in Africa. Which three would you pick? Explain why.
Important information: This discussion is to focus onMODERN humans. That means hominids that appeared in the fossil record after 300kya. Please focus on the topic. Consider how you would use DNA to test the origins of modern humans. No discussion of apes, australopithecines and earlier species of the genus Homo (before 500 kya) in your answer.
assignmentwill be uploaded automatically to Turnitin upon submission
to verify this is your original work and no parts were copied from
another student.
Turnitin is now more closely integrated with Canvas. Overall, you will find Turnitin assignments easier to use, but the steps to submit an assignment have changed somewhat. Directions are as follows:
1. Click the orange “Submit Assignment” button at the top of the page to open the upload window.
2. Click on “Choose File” to select your assignment file you want to upload.
3. Check the box to agree to the Turnitin End-User License Agreement.
4. Click “Submit Assignment.”
5. Your Turnitin report will be visible in the “Grades” section of your course.
Please contact your instructor if you have any questions.
Purpose
The purpose of the iCARE Paper assignment is to explore the concept of interprofessional teams and patient outcomes. Nursing supportive actions of compassion, advocacy, resilience, and evidence-based practice will serve as a way to apply care concepts.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO1: Applies principles of nursing, theories, and the care philosophies to self, colleagues, individuals, families, aggregates and communities throughout the healthcare system. (PO#1)
CO6: Plans clinical practice activities that integrate professional nursing standards in accordance with the Nursing Code of Ethics and the American Nurses’ Association (ANA) standards of practice. (PO#6)
Points
The assignment is worth 200 points.
Due Date
Submit your completed assignment by Sunday end of Week 5 by 11:59 p.m. MT.
Getting Started: Interprofessional teams are part of practice trends we see developing in all aspects of care delivery. Consider you own work environment (or recent clinical setting).
For this assignment, consider the concept of interprofessional teamwork and patient outcomes.
Look to your current workplace as an example. (If you are not currently employed, look to a past workplace or clinical practice area.)
Apply the components of the iCARE concept to interprofessional teams in a short paper. (Body of the paper to be 3 pages, excluding the title page and references page)
iCARE components are:
C ompassion
A dvocacy
R esilience
E vidence-Based Practice (EBP)
How could you contribute to an interprofessional team and patient outcomes through nursing actions of: compassion, advocacy, resilience, and evidence-based practice?
Select one scholarly nursing article from CINAHL as a resource for your paper.
Additional scholarly sources can be used but are optional.
When searching in the CINAHL database, please limit your search word to one component of the paper you wish to emphasize, such as ‘Resilience’. Searching for the term iCARE will not produce the results you need.
Elements of iCARE paper
Title page
Below are the headings to be used for this assignment.
Introduction: (No heading needed here in APA) Explain the type of work setting you are discussing and whether interprofessional teams are currently present. If interprofessional teams are present, indicate a team function that could be improved. If interprofessional teams are NOT present, indicate what type of team you think might be possible in the setting.
Describe a nursing action item for each component below that could contribute to: interprofessional team support; how this might impact the culture of your unit or organization; and possible impact on patient outcomes.
Compassion
Advocacy
Resilience
Evidence-Based Practice
Summary: Include a summary statement of how iCARE components can support interprofessional teams and patient outcomes. Address how you may be able to influence this process of support for interprofessional teams overall in your unit or organization.
References: List any references used in APA format.
Templates
The prepared paper template is RECOMMENDED for this assignment.
Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.
The template provided is recommended.
Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.
Use the rubric as a final check prior to submission to ensure all content is clearly addressed.
Scholarly Sources and Citations
Use APA format for citations and references.
Please paraphrase throughout. One short quote is permitted.
**Academic Integrity**
Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.
By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.
Rubric
Week 5 iCARE Paper Grading Rubric
Week 5 iCARE Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction The type of work setting and interprofessional team features are described (improvement or type of team).
25.0 pts Introduction thoroughly describes the work setting and features of the interprofessional team.
22.0 pts Introduction describes the work setting and features of the interprofessional team.
20.0 pts One element from the first column is missing or lacks detail.
10.0 pts Two elements from the first column are missing and lack detail.
0.0 pts The introduction is missing.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompassion Nursing action related to compassion is described in support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.
25.0 pts The nursing action related to compassion was clearly identified and support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes were thoroughly explained.
22.0 pts The nursing action related to compassion was identified and satisfactorily supported the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.
20.0 pts The nursing action related to compassion was identified and one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail.
10.0 pts The nursing action related to compassion lacked more than two elements of support or lacked detail.
0.0 pts No Marks
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdvocacy Nursing action related to advocacy is described in support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.
25.0 pts The nursing action related to advocacy was identified and support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes were thoroughly explained.
22.0 pts The nursing action related to advocacy was identified and satisfactorily supported the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.
20.0 pts The nursing related to advocacy was identified and one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail.
10.0 pts The nursing action related to advocacy lacked more than two elements of support or lacked detail.
0.0 pts The nursing action and support elements were missing.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResilience Nursing action related to resilience is described in support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.
25.0 pts The nursing action related to resilience was identified and support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes were thoroughly explained.
22.0 pts The nursing action related to resilience was identified and satisfactorily supported the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.
20.0 pts The nursing action related to resilience was identified and one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail.
10.0 pts The nursing action related to resiliency lacked more than two elements of support or lacked detail.
0.0 pts The nursing action and support elements were missing.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence-Based Practice Nursing action related to EBP is described in support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.
25.0 pts The nursing action related to EBP was identified and support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes were thoroughly explained.
22.0 pts The nursing action related to EBP was identified and satisfactorily supported the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.
20.0 pts The nursing action related to EBP was identified and one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail.
10.0 pts The nursing action related to EBP was not sufficiently identified or one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail.
0.0 pts The nursing action and support elements were missing.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary Explain how nursing actions of the iCARE components can support interprofessional teams and patient outcomes. Address how you can influence support for interprofessional teams on your unit or area of practice.
35.0 pts Key points regarding nursing actions and support for interprofessional teams and patient outcomes; and, nursing supportive influence are thoroughly described.
31.0 pts Most key points regarding nursing actions and support for interprofessional teams and patient outcomes; and, nursing supportive influence are described.
28.0 pts Some key points regarding nursing actions and support for interprofessional teams and patient outcomes; and, nursing supportive influence are described
13.0 pts Summary lacks details of key points.
0.0 pts Summary is missing.
35.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Organization The discussion is well organized and logical. The structure is clear and compelling to the reader. Paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas stand out
20.0 pts Excellent mechanics and organization with minimal errors of the following: Well organized and logical, correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling, professional wording is used, uses complete sentences, paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas expressed clearly.
18.0 pts Good mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the column A. Few errors noted.
16.0 pts Fair mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the column A. Some errors noted.
8.0 pts Poor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the column A. Many errors noted.
0.0 pts Very poor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the column A such that it is difficult to follow or understand.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA APA format is used throughout.
20.0 pts Excellent APA formatting with minimal errors of the following: All sources cited in the text -all references listed on the reference page using basics of APA format -title page in general APA format -headings present and follow APA format -12-point font, double spaced, 1 inch margins, paragraphs indented -used only one short quote and body of the paper is approximately 3 pages
18.0 pts Good formatting considering the elements listed in column A.
16.0 pts Fair formatting considering the elements listed in column A. Some APA errors noted.
8.0 pts Poor formatting considering the elements listed in column A. Many APA errors noted.
0.0 pts Very poor formatting such that paper is difficult to read. Numerous APA errors noted.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of CINAHL article as Required Source from CCN Library
0.0 pts 0 points deducted
Used CINAHL article from CCN Library
0.0 pts 20 points (10%) deducted
Required article source of CINAHL not used resulting in point deduction
0.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deduction
0.0 pts 0 points deducted
Submitted on time
0.0 pts Not submitted on time – Points deducted
1 day late = 10 deduction; 2 days late = 20 deduction; 3 days late = 30 deduction; 4 days late = 40 deduction; 5 days late = 50 deduction; 6 days late = 60 deduction; 7 days late = 70 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late
What are some recent changes in legislation and how do these changes influence the way that an administrator would operate within the health care system?
How can administrators account for the value and dignity of individuals and groups when creating legislation?
What current trends are emerging in health care? Using the current trends, speculate on the future of health care risk management from the perspective of both the health care administrator and the patient.
Support your position by referencing four or five academic resources. Incorporate the research into your writing in an appropriate, scholarly manner.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines
As the American pharmaceutical industry matured, what has been the primary positive things that have occurred? What have been the most negative things?
What impact has the maturation of the pharmaceutical industry had on health care in the United States?
Are there parallels between the late 1910s and today (100 + years later)?
