An estimated 80% of 50 million people affected by violent conflicts, civil wars, disasters, and displacement are women and children.
Lifetime prevalence rate of violence against women ranges from 16% to 50%.
At least one in five women suffer rape or attempted rape in their lifetime. Select a mental health illness as a diagnosis for a female patient, perhaps one you have encountered in the clinical setting. Describe the illness, how is it treated? What is your follow-up? Discuss how the WHO’s comprehensive mental health action plan 2013 – 2020 addresses a strategy for change in the mental health illness you selected.
Use 3 APA citation references, within 5 years with nursing content for this discussion.
The EBP process is a powerful way of advancing improvements in health care. Identify three strategies that you will now incorporate into your practice based on this course. Explain your rationale.
Write a review about the individuals’ binge drinking while in college. Have you witnessed this type of behavior as a college student? How does the family disease model relate to individuals in the video?
Support your answer with peer-reviewed journal articles and the textbook only. Must have at least 3 references and be at least 3 or more pages length. The paper must be type written, doubled space, Times New Roman 12 font, and in APA format. View the Grading Rubrics in the Course Information Syllabus section for grading standards.
Instructions: Please answer using your own words in a minimum of 500 words (2-3 paragraphs). PER QUESTION 6 in total. Referenced with two (3) peer-reviewed journal articles or qualified text publish within the past five years and follow APA Manual 6th or 7th editions scholarly writing guidelines. APA in-text Citation formatting is required. When writing replies, please provide your experiences, new ideas, add probing questions to engage readers and new literature on the topic to enhance the learning opportunity.
Questions:
1.1. The LTC Continuum
Let us begin by exploring the “big picture” view of Long Term Care (LTC). Seventy percent of people 65 and over will need some form of LTC service during their lifetimes. Take some time to review these two sites listed in the class schedule: Genworth 2019 Cost of Care and 2019 Alzheimer’s Association Facts and Figures.
What are your initial impressions? Discuss why understanding LTC is an important aspect of healthcare leadership. Support your opinions with valid references.
1.2. The LTC Continuum – 1
Care at Home, Community Based Programs and Services, Naturally Occurring Retirement Communities, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Communities, and caregiver issues. Your Answer should be in the form of a case study analysis. Here is an example of how to format one: https://writingcenter.ashford.edu/writing-case-study-analysis You can use another similar approach or a variation of this example.
Consider this scenario, a composite of actual circumstances.
Bob and Mary were happy when their military service ended, they married and embarked on their civilian careers. Bob and Mary were healthcare professionals; Bob was a professor at the local medical school and Mary was a hospice nurse. Bob and Mary were always active in their church and volunteered their time in the community. They both retired at age 65 to pursue their dream of domestic and international travel. During the early years of their retired life, the couple continued to work part time, travel extensively, and spend time with their grandkids. When Mary turned 78 years of age Bob noticed that she was having memory problems.
Mary always kept up on the latest topics and was always the first to complete the crossword puzzles and other logic games in the newspaper. However, Mary seemed to become increasingly forgetful; she would run errands to purchase specific items and return home empty-handed. The couple decided to seek help from a gerontologist. An extensive battery of cognitive and neuropsychological tests determined that Mary’s language skills and mental abilities had markedly diminished. Mary was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, an incurable terminal brain disease. After the initial shock of the diagnosis, the couple developed a plan that included Bob serving as Mary’s sole caregiver.
Over time, the disease progressed making it difficult for Bob to meet Mary’s needs. In addition, the progression of the disease was tough for both Bob, the children and grandchildren to witness. At first Mary became confused, then she became progressively irritable and aggressive. Five years after the diagnosis, Mary became almost totally withdrawn. Her appetite was nonexistent, and she became incontinent. Additionally, Mary was diagnosed with “sundowners’ syndrome” – a phenomenon whereby the individual experiences confusion and exasperation during the late afternoon or early evening hours.
Bob struggled to care for her and keep an upbeat attitude; however, he too was experiencing health issues due to aging. Bob was a competitive runner for years which impacted his knees and other joints. At times, this condition prevented him from daily activities, self-care and taking care of Mary.
Bob eventually hired a home health aide to visit daily to assist Mary and also do some light household chores. As Mary’s condition grew more serious, he had to make a decision. He was no longer able to care for her, and his own ailments were starting to severely impact his ability to take care of himself.
Bob and Mary had no assets and their retirement savings was gone. They were forced to ask for financial assistance from their children. Luckily, their children were professionals and able to assist Bob and Mary financially. The family had a meeting and agreed that Bob and Mary need to move into a home where they can both get the care that they need.
Questions
What long-term care options should be considered by Bob and his family for both himself and Mary?
What are the requirements necessary to access the care you have chosen in Question 1?
What funding mechanisms are available to Bob and Mary, and how does this affect the choice of their care options?
What could Bob and Mary have done to plan their care during their later years?
What is your plan to prepare for the possibility of your need for long-term care?
1.3. The LTC Continuum – 2 Caregivers
Skilled Nursing Facilities, Palliative Care, Hospice and End of Life Care.
You have been hired as a consultant to the city government to conduct a survey of caregivers. Who will you define as a caregiver? How will you pick your sample? What will you ask? What are the salient issues that you will want to cover?
What are the major strengths and weaknesses of the nursing home survey process in assuring that residents have high levels of quality of care and quality of life?
1.5 Beyond the Four Walls
What do you consider to be the key areas for developing quality metrics in home and community based care? Which ones are easier to measure than others?
1.6 The Price is Right
Every discussion of Long Term Care eventually arrives at the subject of cost. In preparation for Week 10, test your knowledge on Medicare and Medicaid.
All stakeholders in LTC should strive to understand how both Medicaid and Medicare are implemented.
Directions: Healthcare policy impacts nursing professionals and the broader public. Regardless of where the registered nurse practices, healthcare policy is an important aspect of professional nursing and guides how nurses will practice, “amplifies the views of nursing, and educates consumers and decision makers” (American Nurses Association, n.d.).
For this assignment, you will review and analyze one of the ANA Official Position Statements
1. Select one of the ANA Official Position Statements and then select one of the subcategories (i.e. position statement: Nursing Practice; subcategory: Delegation) and
2. Turn in your selection to the comments section of this forum for approval. You may want to select two in case your first choice is taken. First selected, first choice.
3. The topic selection is due by week 2. Ask questions if you are unsure!
Below are the contents of the paper for the assignment:
The paper is due week 5 in the TurnItIn forum (less than 20% unoriginality) and in the grading forum
This is an APA formatted paper. A template for an APA formatted paper is on the moodle page near the APA references and information. You may use that template, but change the sections that need changing. Use the MEAL acronym for developing your paper.
APA requirements for all papers is on the moodle page near the APA references and information.
There should be at least references for the position statement, QSEN competency, the comparison organization, and at least two peer-reviewed journals for the analysis section. Do not use .com or .net websites at all
Review the rubric that will be used for grading before you turn it in for a grade.
Introduction
no introduction earns a zero
0points
Introduction disorganized. Main idea vague or missing.
3points
Constructs introduction with minimal preparation for contents of paper. Main idea vague
7points
Constructs introduction preparing reader for contents of paper. Main idea clear
8points
Constructs well thought introduction clearly preparing reader for contents of paper.
no description of topic and ANA position earns a zero (0)
0points
Disorganized description with multiple gaps.
3points
Good description of the topic and ANA official position with identifiable gaps
7points
Provides a simple description of the topic and ANA official position with little detail and limited perspective
8points
Well-stated complete description of the topic and ANA official position
10points
Compares and Contrasts the position with another federal, national, or global organization on the same or similar position
no comparison and contrast earns a zero
0points
Provides limited or no description of the chosen indicators; fails to demonstrate understanding of the indicators applicability to the organization.
3points
Compares or contrasts position conveying little understanding of official position and applicability of the organizations.
7points
Provides simple comparison and contrast of the position with another organization.
8points
Well-stated, detailed comparison and contrast with other organization on the same or similar position – well discussed with supporting evidence
10points
Describes how the selected position supports at least one QSEN competency and relevant KSA’s
no description of QSEN and the ANA position earns a zero
0points
Poor description of how the selected position supports QSEN competencies.
3points
Description conveys little understanding of the official position and selected QSEN competency and KSA’s.
7points
Description is superficial and limited in scope and details of the selected QSEN competency and KSA.
8points
Well-stated description is detailed including appropriate competency and KSA; examples given.
10points
Analyze the impact of the position on the nursing profession and the broader public
Selection of this criteria is due to plagiarism throughout paper.
0points
Little to no analysis of the impact of the position on the nursing profession and the broader public – examples irrelevant
5points
Superficial analysis of impact of the position on the nursing profession and broader public – did not include information; few to no examples
10points
Good analysis with gaps addressing impact of the position on the nursing profession and broader public – examples
12points
Robust analysis of the impact of the position on the nursing profession and broader public – examples
15points
Discuss how a coach leader would promote this position with novice nurses.
Selection of this criteria is due to plagiarism throughout paper.
0points
Discussion lacks depth or no inclusion of the coach leader
3points
Superficial discussion of the coach leader, needs of the noivce nurse, or inclusion of the position
4.5points
Provides a complete discussion of the coach leader and promotion of the select position with novice nurses
5points
Conclusion
No conclusion earns a zero
0points
Conclusion disorganized. Main idea vague or missing.
3points
Constructs conclusion with minimal summary of contents of paper. Main idea vague
7points
Constructs conclusion summarizes contents of paper. Main idea clear.
8points
Constructs well thought conclusion clearly summarizing contents of paper.
10points
Writing Mechanics (Spelling/standard Grammar/ organizational flow of thoughts
Selection of this criteria is due to plagiarism throughout paper.
0points
___Flow of content poor. ___ Multiple issues with writing mechanics and no evidence of review
1points
___Flow of content with gaps. ___ Assignment shows evidence of minimal review for spelling and grammar errors ___ Multiple issues with writing mechanics
3points
___Provides logical flow of content ___ Assignment is at least checked using word processing spelling and grammar tools ___ Few to several issues with writing mechanics
4points
___Provides logical flow of content ___ Assignment is at least checked using word processing spelling and grammar tools ___ Assignment is also checked visually for errors not detected electronically ___ Syntax, grammar, spelling, punctuation, usage, mechanics, organization, and clarity are at the highest level
5points
APA Format
Plagiarism throughout paper. Earns a zero for the paper
0points
___ Does not adhere to APA elements 1
6points
___ Adheres to a small number of APA elements
6points
___ Adheres to APA format but lacks 1-2 elements
8points
___ Entire paper is double-spaced with 1″ margins ___ 12 pt font, New Times Roman ___ Correct running head (header) with pagination ___ Title, name, school name centered and double-spaced (please also include course number and title, date and instructor’s name) ___ Length sufficient to properly develop written communication with respect to the main idea, subtopics, etc. (ca. 5-7 or perhaps a few more pages)
10points
Attribution
___ No attribution which leads to plagiarism; may result in paper earning zero points
0points
___ Attribution present but significantly incomplete, papers contains plagiarism
2points
___ Sources properly attributed, no plagiarism
4points
___ All sources properly attributed, no plagiarism, paraphrasing and direct quotes where appropriate
5points
References & Citations
___ No references for unoriginal work 0 – may result in a zero for the entire paper. Does not turn paper in to TURNITIN or Plagiarism throughout earning zero points for paper.
0points
___References present but significantly incomplete, unclear or otherwise minimally acceptable
5points
___ References on separate titled page (centered) ___ Not all in correct APA format (all information included and appropriate for type of source) ___ Less than the following (listed alphabetically; hanging indent; minimum of four credible, accurate and appropriate sources; each source is cited at least once and all cited sources are included in references, citations complete and correct)
8points
___ References on separate titled page (centered, bolded) ___ In correct APA format (all information included and appropriate for type of source) ___ Listed alphabetically ___ Hanging indent ___ Each source is cited at least once and all cited sources are included in references ___ All in-text citations complete and correctly applied