1-) Ethical Decision-Making Framework: choose one framework to ground it tour the decision-making. Will you use deontology, consequentialism, a virtue ethics, or a combination of the three.
2-)Why did you decide to you use this ethical framework?)
For example, if your ethical theory is consequentialism, your will need to determine the consequencesof addressing or not addressing the ethical issue on various stakeholder groups.
– 2 to 3 pages, double-spaced (font 12, times new roman)
How can evidenced based practice guidelines be utilized ?
One of the ways that the NP can manage risk of being successfully sued for malpractice or negligence is by utilizing evidence practice guidelines. Explain how these guidelines affect the “standard of care” and discuss how utilizing this guideline can be a major strategy to significantly reduce risk to the provider.
Absolutely no plagiarism, must be original and very thorough. Please make sure everything is followed in the question and the grading rubric. Assigned articles are attached, please also use at least one other outside academic resource for each question. Must include in-text citations. Must include specific real-life application (current events, work or personal experience, prior coursework, etc.) and/or other peer-reviewed research to support key points. No cover page needed but the questions should be separate with their own references. Please provide short but thorough sentences.
The Board of Directors of Oxford Hospital has just named you as the hospital’s first Compliance Officer. One of your responsibilities is to attend board meetings quarterly. In your first week on the job, you suspect fraud and abuse in some of the hospital practices. You have just begun an investigation when you must attend your first board meeting.
How will you approach the board with this issue and what questions will you ask of the board members?
What remedial measures will be their responsibility?
What new practices would you like to see throughout the organization?
Question #2:
As the Compliance Officer at Oxford Hospital, you are concerned about the level of care provided to patients because of lack of adequate staffing. Hotline reports indicate dissatisfaction from both patients and employees. A nearby hospital has begun offering some patient appointments through video communication.
Discuss the risks and rewards that you see with implementing this service for patients.
What compliance and ethics issues do you see with this new practice?
What oversight measure would you institute?
Question #3:
Supporting material:
PACE mySPH (2012). Quantitative vs. qualitative data [Video file]. Retrieved from
As you progress through the phases of your project, you will be gathering data through your research. As you discovered in this week’s reading, both qualitative and quantitative data are useful when conducting research. The integration of quantitative and qualitative data provides the researcher with potential to strengthen the rigor and enrich the analysis and findings of a project.
What are the differences between qualitative and quantitative data and how will you use these types of data in your project? Be specific in your definitions. (I’ll upload my project blueprint once I choose a tutor)
Please see grading rubric below. This assignment should be at least 4-5 paragraphs each and very thorough. Make sure you integrate real-life applications to support key points.
Case Discussion Rubric (2016)
Case Discussion Rubric (2016)
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality of Initial Posting
Initial response displays an excellent understanding of the assigned case, the course readings, and the underlying concepts and includes the correct use of relevant terminology. Initial response additionally integrates specific real-life application (current events, work or personal experience, prior coursework, etc.) and/or other peer-reviewed research to support key points. Initial response is clear, concise, and compelling.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics
Entirely free of mechanical errors. These include: grammar, punctuation, spelling, and formatting (font style and size).
Professional Communication and Leadership in Healthcare
Select a conversation where you had a disagreement that had an impact on you and triggered a bioreaction. The conversation could have been a long time ago or recently.
A. Explain what happened during the disagreement by answering the following questions:
• When did you realize that there was a disagreement during the conversation?
• Describe a bioreaction(s) that was experienced during the disagreement.
• How did the conversation end?
B. Analyze the conversation by answering the following questions:
• Using the four levels of the conversation meter, what level were you listening at, and what level was the other person listening at?
• Give examples of two factors that describe how you and they were listening in at these levels in the conversation meter: feelings, behaviors, language, or tone.
• What were your points of alignment or disagreement?
C. Reflect on how the conversation encouraged you to listen differently by answering the following questions:
• How could you have listened differently moving up the conversation meter, and what effect would that have had on the disagreement?
• How could you incorporate listening for needs, purpose, or concern to create value in the conversation (including describing what that would look like)?
• What have you learned about accuracy and authenticity that could be used to improve the conversation?
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
I have the rubric guideline for the paper, do you want me to send it to you?
12 hours ago
QVP Task 2 (1018)
Not Evident
Approaching Competence
Competent
A. Description of Conversation
An explanation of what happened during the disagreement is not provided.
The explanation is missing or unclear details of what occurred during the disagreement. Or the description of the situation or bioreaction(s) is unclear or includes minimal details of when the disagreement occurred. Or the explanation is missing the conclusion of the conversation.
The explanation includes contextual details of what occurred during the disagreement, including a clear description of the situation and bioreaction(s) experienced, the realization that there was disagreement, and the conclusion of the conversation.
B. Analysis of Conversation
An analysis of the conversation is not provided.
An analysis of the conversation includes an unclear description of the listening levels of both parties, or it does not reference the four levels of conversation meter. Examples of specific behaviors, language, and tone are poorly detailed or insufficiently support the listening levels identified for either parties; or the analysis includes an unspecific or missing discussion of point(s) of alignment or disagreement.
The analysis of the conversation includes a description of the listening levels of both parties, according to the four levels of conversation meter. Examples of specific feelings, behaviors, language, or tone are well detailed and support the level of listening identified for both parties. The analysis also includes an appropriate discussion of point(s) of alignment or disagreement.
C. Impact of Conversation
A reflection on how the conversation encouraged the candidate to listen differently is not provided.
The reflection demonstrates a lack of, or unclear, understanding of the effect of listening differently during the disagreement, including an impractical explanation of how accuracy and authenticity can be used to improve the conversation. The reflection includes unclear insights of how incorporating listening for needs, purpose, and concern can create value in a conversation, or it does not address how that would look in practice.
The reflection on how the conversation encouraged the candidate to listen differently demonstrates a thorough understanding of the effect of listening differently during the disagreement, including a feasible explanation of how accuracy and authenticity could be used to improve the conversation.
The reflection includes insights on how incorporating listening for needs, purpose, or concern create value in a conversation and what that looks like in practice.
DE. Professional Communication
Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.
Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.
Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.
As previously discussed, psychosocial health can have varying impacts on an individual’s personal health and wellness. As a future professional in the field of health, it is important for you to assess your own level of psychosocial health and consider what areas you may want to adjust in order to improve or enhance your personal health and wellness.
For this Assignment, you complete three psychosocial assessments.
To prepare for this Assignment:
Complete the following assessments in Health: The basics, 13th edition:
Explain which areas of your psychosocial health you want to improve or enhance based upon your assessment and why.
Support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as appropriate. Refer to the Essential Guide to APA Style for Walden Students to ensure that your in-text citations and reference list are correct.
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2012). Personal Health and Wellness: Dimensions of Health Wheel [Multimedia], Baltimore, MD: Author.
Dimensions of Health: Week 2
Optional Resources
McFadden, K. M. (2010). Cross-addiction: from morbid obesity to substance abuse. Bariatric Nursing and Surgical Patient Care, 5(2), 145–178. Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
