History

Rhetorical Critical Analysis Essay on No Name Women

Rhetorical Critical Analysis Essay on No Name Women

You will be writing a rhetorical critical analysis essay. No first person perspective.

This is a not a first-person narrative, personal commentary, or book review. There is nothing “autobiographical” in nature, also known as an “author’s bio,” to be explored within this essay assignment. If your readers are interested in reading about Maxine Hong Kingston biography, there is plenty of information out there; this is not your focus.

Instead, your goal is to create a working thesis, based off an area you found interesting in reading the book, while using the PDFs, etc., to create a “working thesis.” However, it is your responsibility to draw connections, even when they are not so obvious, to the “Essay Prompt/Topic” below, using the primary text, academic/scholarly PDFs, and other content having been provided for you in this course, in effort to support a solid thesis statement and/or argument of the essay.

TIP: Ground your argument/position with a philosopher(s) and/or ideologies from the course text(s), especially since there is no use first-person allowed. If you elect to write in first person, you will have failed the essay assignment. Write a minimum of a five, full (5) pages, MLA-formatted essay (acceptable, but not required to go over five pages). Anything less than a full five (5) pages will result in a compromise in points. This means you did not meet the “minimum requirements.” Your Works Cited page is not considered part of the minimum five (5) full pages.

Supporting your Thesis & Minimum Sources and Citation Requirements *Six (6) Citations Total

1. Support your thesis: Use a minimum of three (3) citations from The Woman Warrior: Memoirs of a Girlhood Among Ghosts, ideally to support your thesis.

2. *Select an additional two (2) resources provided: Select a minimum of one (1) citation from each source, from any of the academic/scholarly PDFs on Kingston.

3. *Select one (1) academic/scholarly source on your own: Utilize your Fresno City College Library Database skills.
a. This can be a book, film, academic/scholarly article, and more.
b. Regardless of what you select, it must be accessed it from the Library (online).
c. Disclaimer: No outside sources, other than the FCC Library requirement is allowed. Any outside commercialized, mainstream sources such as Wikipedia, Merriam-Dictionary, Walt Disney references, social media, general websites, Yahoo, etc. Instead, any and/all contributions must be academic/scholarly in nature, and through the use of the Fresno City College Library database (only).

No exceptions. In the end, it will look like this (Citations | Sources | & What’s Listed on Your Works Cited)

• Three (3) citations from The Woman Warrior: Memoirs of a Girlhood Among Ghosts

• Two (2) citations, one from two (2) different sources that come from the academic/scholarly PDFs provided for you in this course.

• One (1) citation, from one (1) academic/scholarly in nature that will come from the Fresno City College Library. Minimum Total number of citations: six (6) Minimum Total number of sources: four (4)

Rhetorical Critical Analysis Essay on No Name Women Read More »

Board, Faculty and Staff Relations Being able to build collaborative relationships within a Learning Community is important for an educational leader. It is also important to apply research based academic theory regarding relationships with stakeholders including the school board, faculty, and staff of the school. In this assignment, you will articulate the theoretical foundations related to collaborative relationships and connect theory to practice in a K-12 educational system. General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association for specific guidelines related to doctoral level writing. The Manual contains essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage. This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Directions: Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) in which you articulate the theoretical foundations related to collaborative relationships and connect theory to practice in a K-12 educational system. Include the following in your paper: A description of two theories for effective collaboration between board members, faculty, support staff, and the community in a K-12 learning community. A research-based evaluation the effectiveness of each theory when applied in a K-12 school community setting.

Board, Faculty and Staff Relations

Being able to build collaborative relationships within a Learning Community is important for an educational leader. It is also important to apply research based academic theory regarding relationships with stakeholders including the school board, faculty, and staff of the school. In this assignment, you will articulate the theoretical foundations related to collaborative relationships and connect theory to practice in a K-12 educational system.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association for specific guidelines related to doctoral level writing. The Manual contains essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.
  • This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Directions:

Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) in which you articulate the theoretical foundations related to collaborative relationships and connect theory to practice in a K-12 educational system. Include the following in your paper:

  1. A description of two theories for effective collaboration between board members, faculty, support staff, and the community in a K-12 learning community.
  2. A research-based evaluation the effectiveness of each theory when applied in a K-12 school community setting.

Board, Faculty and Staff Relations Being able to build collaborative relationships within a Learning Community is important for an educational leader. It is also important to apply research based academic theory regarding relationships with stakeholders including the school board, faculty, and staff of the school. In this assignment, you will articulate the theoretical foundations related to collaborative relationships and connect theory to practice in a K-12 educational system. General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association for specific guidelines related to doctoral level writing. The Manual contains essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage. This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Directions: Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) in which you articulate the theoretical foundations related to collaborative relationships and connect theory to practice in a K-12 educational system. Include the following in your paper: A description of two theories for effective collaboration between board members, faculty, support staff, and the community in a K-12 learning community. A research-based evaluation the effectiveness of each theory when applied in a K-12 school community setting. Read More »

Having developed a definition of popular culture in the last module,

Having developed a definition of popular culture in the last module,

popular culture and you

Having developed a definition of popular culture in the last module, this week we’re turning to how popular culture applies to you personally. This could be related to your personal experiences (such as your fandom) or things you’ve observed about those around you (for instance, how your family members interact with popular culture). Based on the module resources and your own research, write an initial post that addresses the following:

  • Describe a popular culture artifact that either you or someone around you finds especially interesting. What resonates with you about the artifact? How does experiencing that artifact help contribute to your understanding of society?
  • Share a current issue related to popular culture that you have found interesting or that has personally impacted you. Post an article from a news source. How does popular culture help you better understand this issue?

In responding to your peers, provide feedback about the examples utilized and the feedback loop being created. Are there other feedback loops being created through these examples (i.e., is there more than one message being presented)? Make sure you support your response with information from the readings, this module, and any additional resources as needed.

Having developed a definition of popular culture in the last module, this week we’re turning to how popular culture applies to you personally. This could be related to your personal experiences (such as your fandom) or things you’ve observed about those around you (for instance, how your family members interact with popular culture). Based on the module resources and your own research, write an initial post that addresses the following:

  • Describe a popular culture artifact that either you or someone around you finds especially interesting. What resonates with you about the artifact? How does experiencing that artifact help contribute to your understanding of society?
  • Share a current issue related to popular culture that you have found interesting or that has personally impacted you. Post an article from a news source. How does popular culture help you better understand this issue?

In responding to your peers, provide feedback about the examples utilized and the feedback loop being created. Are there other feedback loops being created through these examples (i.e., is there more than one message being presented)? Make sure you support your response with information from the readings, this module, and any additional resources as needed.

Having developed a definition of popular culture in the last module, Read More »

Annotated bibliography

Annotated bibliography

Do 5 sources with a total of 600 words

My topic is about Adolf Hitler. Why can he be considered a monster?

Please look at my proposal so you can understand my topic better

For this assignment you must find a minimum of four acceptable sources. Do not limit your sources unnecessarily. If you find more than four sources, feel free to include them. When writing your annotated bibliography, you should follow these steps:

  • When you have several sources, you will need to write a correct MLA Works Cited entry for each source.
  • The first part of the annotation should be a brief summary of the source based upon the thesis, main ideas, and key terms. What is the main argument?
  • The second part of the annotation should be an assessment of the source, discussing its suitability as an academic source and its applicability to your research and project. Consider the author’s purpose and reliability, including some information about who the author is and why he or she is reputable. You may wish to discuss how the source relates to some of your other sources. Is the source objective or biased? Is it useful?
  • The last part of the annotation will be your reflection on the source. Consider how it fits in with your research. How helpful is the source? How do you see it fitting in with your project? How has it informed or otherwise changed or shaped your ideas?

Annotated bibliography Read More »

In your paper, imagine that you have been asked to explain the article

In your paper, imagine that you have been asked to explain the article

Reading Response paper

For this paper, you will compose a 3-page (Times New Roman, double-spaced, one-inch margins, etc.) response to the reading Raymond Williams, “From Medium to Social Practice” in Marxism and Literature.(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977): 158-165.

In your paper, imagine that you have been asked to explain the article to one of your fellow students. You should concisely summarize the main points, offer one or two points of critique, and respond to the author’s argument. Some possible questions to consider as you write are:

  • What problem is the author trying to address?
  • What are the stakes of the author’s argument? In other words, why is it important to the author that I agree with their position?
  • What does the author want me to understand or believe?
  • Who is the audience that the author is trying to convince?
  • What is effective or ineffective about the way the author makes their argument?
  • What lingering questions does the author leave unanswered?
  • Your paper should:
    • Clearly and concisely articulate both the author’s position and your own
    • Identify at least two points of critique and explain why they are effective or ineffective at supporting the author’s argument
    • Propose the article’s “next steps” by identifying what is missing, what remains unanswered, or how the author’s argument might be usefully applied in another context
    • Have a logical structure and correct spelling and grammar
    • Include a bibliography with proper citations for all sources
    • For more tips and things to think about, check out this online resource: https://owlcation.com/humanities/Sample-Reading-Response-Paper

BOOK: Raymond Williams, “From Medium to Social Practice” in Marxism and Literature.(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977): 158-165.

Follow the instruction, do not plagiarize, this is the reading response

Note

In your paper, imagine that you have been asked to explain the article Read More »

Scroll to Top