Law

A discussion based on facts and opinions and how sources work and can be manipulated.

A discussion based on facts and opinions and how sources work and can be manipulated.

Week 3 Discussion: Evaluating Sources

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 6, 7
  • Lesson
  • Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook)

Introduction
“Everyone is entitled to their own opinions – but not their own facts.” (Daniel Patrick Moynihan, cited in Vanity Fair, 2010, para. 2)

We form opinions – and make our judgments – based on facts we observe and values we hold. Our judgments are also influenced by the opinions of others. In the section “An Expert on Hate in America” in Chapter 6, one of the authors, Dr. Peter Facione, renders an opinion on a non-profit civil rights organization: Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Dr. Facione is a leading advocate and one of the most influential voices in the field of critical thinking.

His endorsement of the civil rights organization is unqualified. It is also transparent: Dr. Facione reveals that he is a financial supporter of the organization and has arranged speaking engagements for its founder. This is Dr. Facione’s invitation to you, the reader:

Knowing where you can learn more about the SPLC for yourself, and knowing about Dr. Facione’s endorsement and support of the Center’s work, evaluate this claim made by Dr. Facione: “The SPLC is an expert on hate in America” (p. 124).

The endorsement of the SPLC is contained in the most current edition of the text, whose copyright date is 2016. Since that time Morris Dees, co-founder and former chief trial counsel, has been fired (Hassan, Zraick & Blinder, 2019). Previously, there has been controversy about groups and individuals that are listed by the SPLC as “hate groups” (Graham, 2016; Price, 2018). The organization, which has nearly a half-billion dollars in assets, has also been criticized for how it spends these funds (Robinson, 2019).

Self-Assessment Question
Before you submit your initial post, make sure to read the assigned chapter. Then, ask yourself the following: Did the article in Chapter 6 of the text seem credible and reliable? Why? Be very specific:

  • Was it because it is in a textbook?
  • Because it was written by a learned and respected person?
  • Because of content in the article?
  • Because of your previous knowledge of the SPLC?

Initial Post Instructions
For the initial post, address the following:

  • Conduct additional research on the SPLC. Did your opinion alter in any way? Why?

Only after you have done some responsible research should you begin to respond to the discussion prompt. The discussion is not about the SPLC; it is not about Dr. Facione. It is about what you have learned about forming opinions.

Your post must answer this question:

  • How do you define the term “expert”?

Your post must also discuss at least two (2) of the following questions:

  • How important are facts in the process of forming an opinion? Explain what you believe to be the purpose or function of facts in making a judgment.
  • How did you respond to the self-assessment question? Since doing further research, have you re-thought the way in which you assess credibility and reliability? What is the importance of factoring the recency of a reference or opinion (i.e., how old is it?) into an assessment of credibility and reliability?
  • How would you evaluate Dr. Facione’s claim “The SPLC is an expert on hate in America” (p. 124). Does the SPLC fit your definition of “expert”? Be specific in your answer.

Writing Requirements

 

  • Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside source)
  • APA format for in-text citations and list of references

Requirements: A well thought out discussion answer that talks about all points of the discussion.

A discussion based on facts and opinions and how sources work and can be manipulated. Read More »

Tittle: Andrea Yates Choose Topic: Law Select number of pages: 1

Tittle: Andrea Yates
Choose Topic: Law
Select number of pages: 1
Question Description: Overview: This activity will allow you to examine the roles and responsibilities of the participants in the judicial process, while utilizing a tool that is helpful to
administrators—a graphic organizer.
Prompt: Visit the Shapiro Library and choose an article about the Andrea Yates case. Create a graphic organizer that evaluates this case from arrest to trial,
identifying the different responsibilities of the participants in the judicial process. Include an examination of how the process works and self corrects when
necessary through appeals and retrial. This Inspiration Software guide will help you understand more about graphic organizers.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Responsibilities: Evaluate the Andrea Yates case from arrest to trial, identifying the different responsibilities of the participants in the judicial process.
II. Examination: Include an examination of how the process works and self corrects when necessary through appeals and retrial.

Guidelines for Submission: Consider a free online

Tittle: Andrea Yates Choose Topic: Law Select number of pages: 1 Read More »

Intelligence Briefing on a topic related to policing/crime/ intelligence in KSA

Intelligence Briefing on a topic related to policing/crime/ intelligence in KSA

Write an Intelligence Briefing on a topic related to policing/crime/ intelligence in KSA following the rubric and be sure to be similer format.In addition to the amendment that I mentioned in the previous one which is include community policing and statistics in your work. The title is Drugs or Terrorism, Human Trafficking, but please apply the robots as well as the statistics and include community policing. But inform me about the subject before starting it

Requirements: Minimum 500 words

don’t forget the community police and statistics at work

The title is terrorism in Saudi Arabia is esey to you?

Intelligence Briefing on a topic related to policing/crime/ intelligence in KSA Read More »

Write an epilogue to ” The Cask of Amontillado” in which a case against Montresor comes to trial.

Write an epilogue to ” The Cask of Amontillado” in which a case against Montresor comes to trial.

Week 4 Creative Writing Assignment:

Write an epilogue to ” The Cask of Amontillado” in which a case against Montresor comes to trial. In your epilogue, provide the prosecuting attorney’s closing argument, reminding the jury of any evidence that proves Montresor’s guilt. Then provide the defense attorney’s closing argument and describe the jury’s final verdict.

undefined

Your submission must:

  • include a minimum of 400 words, written in paragraph form.
  • be written in the third-person point of view (academic voice). You may write in the first-person point of view if you want to pretend you are Montresor.
  • be double spaced. A title page, running head, and abstract are not required.
  • be submitted as a Microsoft Word attachment on the submission page (click title above). Assignments not submitted in this way may be returned to you ungraded.

No Research

There is a no-research policy in place for this class. Using any material other than the assigned readings and lectures, even if it is correctly quoted and cited, will result in a failing grade for this assignment. Contact your instructor if you have questions about this policy.

Requirements: 400 words

Write an epilogue to ” The Cask of Amontillado” in which a case against Montresor comes to trial. Read More »

Assess Death with Dignity laws

Assess Death with Dignity laws

This week, you looked at the provider and patient rights. The assignment this week gives you a chance to look at a state law that provides the right for patients to die with dignity and compare the patient’s right with the ethical duty of physicians set forth in the AMA’s Code of Ethics.

You will write an essay that compares and contrasts the law and Code of Ethics as it applies to your state. Incorporate the following into your essay:

  1. Referring directly to the law, provide verbiage for what a provider is or is not allowed to do.
  2. What requirements must be present for a patient asking for death-hastening medication?
  3. Describe what the AMA’s Code of Ethic’s stance is on these procedures, including any additional opinions published by the AMA.
  4. Explain the challenging ethical decision-making process a provider must go through in this case.
  5. How might this situation be resolved for a legal and ethical resolution?

Length: 3-4 pages, not including title page

References: The AMA Code Ethics.

Assess Death with Dignity laws Read More »

Critical Thinking Questions

Critical Thinking Questions

Chapter 4

  1. Please think of a research question that you would like to study that you could study using random sampling. What is your question, and how would you go about sampling randomly for this type of study?
  2. Please think of a research question that might lend itself well to using random sampling procedures, but which might be difficult to study using random sampling procedures. What question did you come up with and what sampling would you choose that closely mimics random sampling procedures?
  3. What do you make of the concept of sampling error? Does this idea make intuitive sense to you? Why or why not? What do you think would happen to a sample if sampling error was not included?

Chapter 5

  1. What do you think of the UCR? Do you like how it measures crime, why or why not? Do you think the improvements to the UCR made in the creation of NIBRS have helped? Why or why not?
  2. What do you think of NIBRS? Based on what you have read in the text, why do you think it is has not been widely adapted across the country? Do you think it will eventually replace the UCR or only act as a supplement to it?
  3. Do you think there are certain types of crime that lend themselves better to one type of measurement than another? If so, give examples of which types of crimes are best measured by the UCR, NCVS, and NIBRS.

 

Critical Thinking Questions

A4

Chapters 6 and 7

Chapter 6

  1. In the perfect world of research what type of survey administration method do you think is the best? Please explain your answer and cite information from the text as to why your method of choice is the best.
  2. What do you see as some of the more salient (important) factors that might affect response rate? As a researcher besides from what has been discussed in the text, what do you think you can do to positively affect response rates? Can you do anything?
  3. What do you think of questionnaire design? Do you really think that it is important? Why or why not? Please explain your answer in detail.

Chapter 7

  1. What do you see as some of the inherent advantages of performing research with secondary sets of data? What are some of the weaknesses? Please think critically on this issue.
  2. Which type of data technique with secondary data interests you more? Content analysis or Meta-analysis? Why?
  3. What do you make of the argument between official data and self-report data? Which type of data do you see as being more valuable as a secondary data source? Why?

Critical Thinking Questions Read More »

Criminal Justice Question

Criminal Justice Question

So topics could be (but are not by any means limited to):

Marijuana trafficking

The effect of marijuana legalization (on crime, health, cost to society, etc. LOTS of new research)

The opioid crisis

The online drug market scene/controversy

Benzodiazepine addiction

Ecstasy and the rave culture

Alcohol and violence

The drug treatment system (or a paper comparing different treatment styles for a particular drug or class of drugs)

The legalization debate (mostly cannabis obviously, but there’s some other stuff too)

Law enforcement methods/tactics in combating illicit drug trade/use

International anti-drug efforts/campaigns

Or something similar

Size requirement: 10 to 15 pages, typed (word processed) and double spaced. I suppose I have to be precise: At least 10 full pages of body, using normal font (10-12 point, double spacing, and no more than 1-inch margins. Submitting a paper under 10 pages, will result in the loss of a minimum of 10% per page OR PORTION THEREOF. So if you give me 9 ¾ pages, you lose 10%. 8 pages, you lose 20%. So don’t go short.Principal Research Material:A: professional journals. This will be your primary source of information for your paper, and you must include a minimum of ten different journal articles as source material. If you are not comfortable with identifying high-quality journals and the FULL TEXT of the article you want to use, please consult the librarians, as they are the subject experts on that topic.B: books on the subject which are written for a professional audience. Not mass-market books, which are often poorly sourced or overtly biased.

 

C: Governmental publications such as the National Survey of Drug Use and Health, or Monitoring The Future. Both are considered fully trustworthy, and each has its strengths in providing information.D: your textbook. Do not neglect it as a starting point for your research. There are many papers referenced in your text which you can find the originals of, and read/potentially use.That’s pretty much it. Websites without authorship are not authoritative, so avoid most unless they are obviously sourceable to a reputable agency.Number of references: A minimum of 15. At least ten journal articles, plus at least five more sources which are primarily academic or professional in nature. Reference format: Please use APA. If you don’t know how, get a style guide or look online. Also, the Citation Machine (citationmachine.net) is extremely cool, and can configure your references in the proper format for your refs page, and will also give you the proper format for an inline citation (inline parenthetical citations are, of course, required in APA format)Paper style:A: These papers are NOT to be written in the first personB: These papers are NOT to be written in conversation styleC: These papers are to be written in the formal third-person of academic research papers.

Criminal Justice Question Read More »

Explain Personality Theory

Explain Personality Theory

Instructions

For this task, prepare a PowerPoint presentation in which you address the following theorists and their perspectives on personality. The audience for this presentation is an undergraduate class studying personality theories.

Theorists:

  • George Kelly
  • Julian Rotter
  • Albert Bandura
  • Carl Rogers

In your presentation, you will need to provide an overview of how these theorists suggest people behave in social interactions.

Your presentation should include a discussion of relevant concepts including, but not limited to self-concept, self-efficacy, personal constructs attribution style and locus of control and self-actualization.

Incorporate appropriate animations, transitions, and graphics as well as “speaker notes” for each slide. The speaker notes may be comprised of brief paragraphs or bulleted lists.

Support your presentation with at least three scholarly resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources may be included.

Length: 10-12 slides (with a separate reference slide)

Notes Length: 100-150 words for each slide

Explain Personality Theory Read More »

Philosophy Question

Philosophy Question

Find a key scene and an anomaly from one of the 12 books in the three volumes of Georgia. Then, use 3 principles from the human rights book to evaluate the anomaly in five pages long following exactly the below instructions.

Attached are the following:

1- The 3 volumes of Georgia. Where to pick a key scene and an anomaly.

2-The human rights book. Where to use 3 principles to evaluate the anomaly.

3-The rubric named “A Philosophical Response to Fiction”, where to follow the instructions. It’s also written below.

Professor Instructions:

1-Find a key scene and an anomaly from one of the 12 books in the three volumes of Georgia. ( the 3 volumes are attached)

2-use 3 principles from the human rights book (attached) to evaluate the anomaly.

3-YOU MUST FOLLOW THE FOLLOWING RUBRIC EXACTLY:

What you need to do in order to fulfill this assignment is:

1- Create a summary sheet on the fictive piece that includes characters, plot, themes, and evaluation (for an example see: michaelboylan.net, blog, book reviews)—this will help you start your paper; it is not a part of your paper.

2- Isolate a single passage in the book that you feel is pivotal to the theme of the book (this passage can be consecutive, for example pages 10-22, or it can be constructed on a common theme, for example pages 135-137 & 192-195 & 238-240.

3- Briefly go through the scene highlighting character, plot, and tropes (metaphors, motifs, description, etc.)

4- Try to discern a particular point of view within the passage that mirrors the book

5- Decide whether you agree or disagree with this point of view

6- Set out the relevant practical and theoretical philosophical principles at stake and apply them to the problem.

7- Use 3 philosophical principles to help you create a positive or negative reaction to the author’s theme (in the small and the large realm). If it is positive, think of bringing up objectors and refute them. If it is negative, engage in a dialog with the author—ending up by rejecting position. The theme should be readily understandable from the scene you have chosen.

8- Reflect on the significance of your position. What abstract general points about the world have now been elucidated? * most important point. At least a page.

Rubric. If you represent all eight points sequentially in your paper you will earn some kind of “B” grade (so long as you are also close to 5 pages, i.e., within a half-page under or a full page over). To get a high “B” or an “A- “or “A” grade you will have to do well on the reflection bullet.

Requirements:   |   .doc file

Philosophy Question Read More »

Rapid Review Psychoactive drug use Cannabis

Rapid Review Psychoactive drug use Cannabis

Note: You papers should be well structured as per the instructions.

Rapid Review Psychoactive drug use Cannabis

In your Rapid Review, analyze and explain the pharmacological aspects of the drug as they relate to the following: neurotransmitters affected, receptors, route of administration, half-life, doses, side effects, drug interactions, contraindications, and other important facets of the drug. Explain these aspects of the drug in terms of the psychiatric disorders indicated for the drug and the issue(s) associated with that use. If there is no accepted therapeutic use for the drug, evaluate and describe the actions of the drug with regard to the abuse process. The paper must focus on the pharmacology of the drug and not on the social or addictive aspects. If you focus on addiction and social impact, your paper will not receive credit.

undefined

In addition to the text, research a minimum of three peer-reviewed articles published within the last five years on your selected drug. Prepare a three-page summary of the drug using the PSY630 Rapid Review Example paper (Links to an external site.) as a guide.

Must be three to five double-spaced pages in length, excluding title page and references page, and it must be formatted according to APA style.

Requirements:   |   .doc file | APA | Analytical Review | 3 pages, Double spaced

Rapid Review Psychoactive drug use Cannabis Read More »

A general analysis of the intern experience

A general analysis of the intern experience

Complete 1,2 and 3 using the provided topic

Topic: you are interning as a paralegal at a law firm. Your job is about filing paperwork about family law, immigration documents, criminal law.

1. Include a short introduction and a thesis statement about your internship at the law firm.

2. A general analysis of the intern experience and how it related to academic experiences; that is, “bridging the gap” between facts, theory, and practice. In this regard, At least 10 scholarly citations must be provided. In this section, you should address what you learned about the way justice is sought and achieved (or not) in the real world. You may contrast your specific observations to what scholarly research suggests about how that kind of agency or organization functions. Point out ways in which experiences and observations confirmed coursework and ways in which they contradicted it.

3. Provide a short concluding paragraph that summarizes the main points of the paper and provides final thought.

The paper must be in APA format, which includes 12-point Times New Roman font, double spaced, with one-inch margins

must be 6 pages Quality work please

A general analysis of the intern experience Read More »

The functions of the National Infrastructure Protection Plan and Critical

The functions of the National Infrastructure Protection Plan and Critical

Law Question

In this course, you have learned about various aspects of physical and personal security. Some of these elements include terrorism, insider threats, and homeland security. These concepts are not new but do have different elements today for individuals and governments. As threats arise, different measures and strategies are developed.

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper that includes:

  • The functions of the National Infrastructure Protection Plan and Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience
  • Why companies need to understand and create protocols for insider threats
  • An assessment of the potential of terrorism and the measures the U.S. can employ if such a threat is identified both domestically and internationally

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Requirements: 1   |   .doc file

You can just use research for this assignment please ignore the first sentence. Please no plagiarism and let me know if there is anything I can do to help.

The functions of the National Infrastructure Protection Plan and Critical Read More »

Employment Law and the Hiring Process

Employment Law and the Hiring Process

After briefing the management team on employment law from the Management Team Briefing on Employment Laws assignment, it is time to apply the knowledge to internal processes. There are many fundamental legal concerns surrounding recruiting and the overall hiring processes within organizations. A current review of the company’s HR policies and procedures centered on employment law reveals some possible opportunities to improve the overall recruitment and hiring process. Specific opportunities exist in background checks, employment tests, and hiring and promotions. If not properly administered, these areas may cause employment law issues within the company.

Instructions

Write a 6–8 page paper in which you:

  1. Briefly explain your overall understanding of conducting employee background checks. Why are they done? Why are they important? Be clear with your discussion.
  2. Identify and discuss at least two types of background checks you believe most organizations conduct and explain how you will ensure the types you select are properly administered in the company.
  3. List and describe at least five employee drug-testing procedures you would implement to comply with state drug-testing laws. How would you ensure adherence to the procedures?
  4. Briefly discuss your understanding of bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ), affirmative action preferences, and promotions. Then, identify at least three actions you would take to avoid employment law issues with these topics. Be specific.

Requirements: 6-8 page

Employment Law and the Hiring Process Read More »

Robodogs as a law enforcement tool

Robodogs as a law enforcement tool

This essay requires that you explain the pros and cons of using Robodogs as a law enforcement tool. In addressing this question please discuss both public policy issues and constitutional issues using the US Constitution, Case law and civil (statutory) law where appropriate. You should begin by discussing this issue in the context of its use in the general public however the focus of the essay is how the conversation changes when we apply these policy arguments and constitutional principles to the incarcerated?

The Question

What are the arguments for and against the law enforcement community’s use of Robo Dogs in general society, and how do these arguments apply in the context of correctional administration’s use of Robo Dogs in Jails, Prisons and Community Corrections? Finally describe your opinion of the use of Robodogs in correctional administration and explain what went into the development of your opinion on this topic.

Requirements: Maximum 4 pages   |

This is for a correctional administration class for my political science major. My professor wants us to discuss public policy issues and constitutional issues the US Constitution, Case law and civil (statutory) law where appropriate. Overall, thats about it.

Robodogs as a law enforcement tool Read More »

1. What key race-based policies and practices have influenced the treatment of children and led to disparities?

1. What key race-based policies and practices have influenced the treatment of children and led to disparities?

answer 3 questions 800 words each

1. What key race-based policies and practices have influenced the treatment of children and led to disparities?

2. What is the relationship between profiles of delinquents based on official statistics and the actual extent of delinquency?

3.Whatinterventiontechniqueshavebeenshown to be effective in youth affected by family violence?

Requirements: 800 words each

 

The Chapters below are from

Juvenile Justice: A Guide to Theory, Policy, and Practice – 9TH 18
by: Cox, Steven M.

1. What key race-based policies and practices have influenced the treatment of children and led to disparities? Read More »

Victimology U1

Victimology U1

1. Do you think the feminist movement is still important to the victims’ movement? Why, or why not?

2. What progress has been made since passing the Violence Against Women Act of 2013?

3. Explain the differences and similarities of von Hentig’s and Mendelsohn’s theories of victimization.

4. What is the difference between criminology and victimology?

5. Summarize one event contributing to the rise of the victims’ rights movement.

**********************************************All answers must be at least 200 words.****************************************************

Requirements: All answers must be at least 200 words

Victimology U1 Read More »

Managing a Compliant and Diverse Workplace

Business Law Question

Managing a Compliant and Diverse Workplace

Recall from the Management Team Briefing on Employment Laws Assignment that the company in the assignment was the defendant in some HR-related lawsuits; claims of harassment, failure to reasonably accommodate disabilities, and work-life balance issues were made by employees, forcing the company to answer to the claims in its own defense. As the new CHRO, you want to enact stronger policies and guidelines to avoid such situations in the future.

Write a 5–6 page paper in which you:

  1. Briefly note how workplace harassment affects equal employment opportunity and describe at least four elements a plaintiff must show to pursue a harassment claim. How might an organization prevent the risk of being the subject of such claims? Hint: Read 6 Tips to Avoid Harassment and Discrimination Claims.
  2. Explain your overall understanding on reasonable accommodation of disability (consider reviewing ADA rules). Then, discuss a minimum of three things a plaintiff filing a failure to accommodate claim must show to prove they are qualified for the job in question.
  3. Make a connection between religious advocacy or harassment and bona fide occupational qualification. Can churches promoting a certain religion refuse to hire people of other faiths? Why or why not?
  4. Discuss your overall understanding of FMLA and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act as they relate to organizations granting leave for each. Then, identify two or three common FMLA mistakes managers make and what you would do to avoid the mistakes. Hint: Read The Top Five FMLA Compliance Mistakes That Could Land You in Court.
  5. Go to Basic Search: Strayer University Online Library to locate at least three quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Requirements: 5-6 pages

Managing a Compliant and Diverse Workplace Read More »

Plato believes he has demonstrated that Thrasymachus

Plato believes he has demonstrated that Thrasymachus

0

Discussion Board

The question for Lesson 2 is: by the end of book 4, Plato believes he has demonstrated that Thrasymachus is wrong about justice. What do you think? Has Socrates succeeded in refuting him? Why or why not?

To receive full credit for this assignment, you must:
1) write a post of 6-8 sentences answering this question for yourself, then
2) provide 4-6 sentences of thoughtful feedback on each of at least 3 posts by other people.

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1497/1497-h/1497-h.htm#link2H_4_0004

https://us-lti.bbcollab.com/collab/ui/session/playback

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1497/1497-h/1497-h.htm#link2H_4_0006

https://us-lti.bbcollab.com/collab/ui/session/playback Cant post replies until the discussion post has been posted

Requirements: 6-8 sentences

Plato believes he has demonstrated that Thrasymachus Read More »

Power and Influence

Power and Influence

Week 3 – Assignment 1
After you have finished your team discussion, write a 3 to 4 page paper that addresses each question below. This is an individual assignment and should synthesize and demonstrate application of your learning from playing the simulation, the team discussion, and course material.
1. Summarize the results you achieved while playing the simulation.
a. What did you do well and what were some areas that needed improvement?
b. What were the important differences demonstrated from each of the four scenarios?
2. Analyze and discuss at least 3 comparisons between the simulation and what we have learned in the course.
3. How can you apply what you learned in this experience to the company you work for? Discuss at least 2 different applications.
4. What were the similarities and differences between how you did and how others on your team did? What were your biggest takeaways from your team discussion?
Professional Formatting Requirements:
• Include a Cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, professor’s name, and the course title and date
• Include a References page, showing all your sources
• The Cover page and the References page are not included in the required page length
• Double-spaced, professional font (Times New Roman or Ariel), 10-12 font size
• Headings used to identify main topics and subtopics

• Paragraphs are separated by a single space.

SCENARIO: https://forio.com/app/harvard/change-management/#/…

Requirements: N/A

Power and Influence Read More »

Distributive Justice following a natural disaster

Distributive Justice following a natural disaster

Topic: Discussion of Distributive Justice following a natural disaster Pick a contemporary natural disaster with which everyone is familiar. The natural disaster selected for discussion should be one that affected a cross-section of society. Discuss how

Topic: Discussion of Distributive Justice following a natural disaster

Pick a contemporary natural disaster with which everyone is familiar. The natural disaster selected for discussion should be one that affected a cross-section of society.

Discuss how the concept of distributive justice was applied in that situation. Look and review a variety of contrasting perspectives based upon differences in socioeconomic status, gender, race & ethnicity, disability, age, proximity of victims to important places in the vicinity, and other demographic factors.

Requirements: 300

Distributive Justice following a natural disaster Read More »

Scroll to Top