Answer the following questions after reviewing our teamwork power-point. This is due on April 24, and may be turned in for late points until April 26. You will have five points deducted for each response less than 300 words, or for each response that is off topic.
1. When have you been a part of a team in college, what was your position in that team, and how would you rate you and your team? (300 words)
MGMT 394 Information Security Management. Security Threats and Vulnerabilities
Hello,
Here are the instructions for the case study:
Research a recent security breach that has occurred within the past year. Write a 1-2 page case study report that explains the attack and what could have been done to prevent the attack. Explain the threats and vulnerabilities within the organization. What was the role of management in this attack? What would be your recommendations to prevent such an attack from occurring in the future?
Submit your paper by the posted due date. Refer to the rubric for detailed grading criteria.
25.0 pts(Excellent – A) Identifies and understands all of the main issues in the case study. Insightful and thorough analysis of all the issues.
23.0 pts(Above-Average – B) Identifies and understands most of the main issues in the case study. Thorough analysis of most of the issues.
21.0 pts(Average – C) Identifies and understands some of the issues in the case study. Superficial analysis of some of the issues in the case.
19.0 pts(Near-Failing – D) Identifies and understands few of the issues in case study. Incomplete analysis of the issues.
17.0 pts(Failing – F) Identifies and understands very little of the issues in case study. No analysis of the issues.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswers to Case Study Questions
20.0 pts(Excellent – A) Answers to case study questions are clear throughout. Connection with class and study material goes well beyond the obvious connections among ideas; demonstrates insight and original thinking.
18.0 pts(Above-Average – B) Answers to case study questions present some irrelevant information on topic etc., but very little; treatment goes beyond obvious connections with class and study material.
16.0 pts(Average – C) Answers to case study questions are vague in places; some irrelevant or distracting information.
14.0 pts(Near-Failing – D) Answers to case study questions are unclear and/or confusing. Treatment is very superficial; paper may be well written but says nothing.
12.0 pts(Failing – F) Does not address the case study questions. Treatment is very superficial and says very little.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComments on effective solutions/strategies
20.0 pts(Excellent – A) Well documented, reasoned, and pedagogically appropriate comments on solutions, or proposals for solutions, to all issues in the case study.
18.0 pts(Above-Average – B) Appropriate, well thought out comments about solutions, or proposals for solutions, to most of the issues in the case study.
16.0 pts(Average – C) Superficial and/or inappropriate solutions to some of the issues in the case study.
14.0 pts(Near-Failing – D) Little or no action suggested, and/or inappropriate solutions to all of the issues in the case study.
12.0 pts(Failing – F) Provided no feasible solutions or strategies to the issues in the case study.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLinks to Course Readings and Additional Research
20.0 pts(Excellent – A) Excellent research into the issues with clearly documented links to class (and/or outside) readings.
18.0 pts(Above-Average – B) Good research and documented links to the material read.
16.0 pts(Average – C) Limited research and documented links to any readings.
14.0 pts(Near-Failing – D) Incomplete research and links to any readings.
12.0 pts(Failing – F) Provided no references or support of analysis.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and Mechanics
15.0 pts(Excellent – A) Chooses words for their precise meaning and uses an appropriate level of specificity. Sentence style fits audience and purpose. Sentences clearly structured and carefully focused. Almost entirely free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors.
12.0 pts(Above-Average – B) Generally uses words accurately and effectively, but may be too general. Sentences generally clear, structured, and focused, though some may be awkward or ineffective. May contain a few errors, which may annoy the reader but not impede understanding.
10.0 pts(Average – C) Uses relatively vague and general words, may use some inappropriate language. Sentence’s structure generally correct, but sentences may be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing. Usually contains several mechanical errors, which may temporarily confuse the reader but not impede the overall understanding.
8.0 pts(Near-Failing – D) Tends to being vague and abstract, or very personal and specific. Usually contains several awkward or ungrammatical sentences; sentence structure is simple or monotonous. Usually contains either many mechanical errors or a few important errors that block the reader’s understanding and ability to see connections between thoughts.
6.0 pts(Failing – F) Misuse of words throughout. Awkward sentences throughout. Difficult to attach a thought process. Poorly punctuated, misspelled words, grammatically abu
Findings as related to effectiveness of strategic plan
Conclusion
This paper must be 6 in length, not counting the title and reference pages. It must include a minimum of 5 scholarly references. This is a scholarly paper that should be based on research, not just on personal opinions and experiences.
Paper should also have appropriate headings and sub-headings in the body of the paper.
Write transition sentences between sections so that the reader knows where you are going and why.
3 Pages OSHA Causal Analysis: Hamlet Chicken Plant Fire
For the Hamlet, N.C. Chicken Processing Plant fire, imagine yourself doing an accident investigation of the accident, write-up a description of the investigation. Note: You may fabricate (“make-up”) as many details as you need. Note: You don’t include the Initial Response phase of the investigation…..the scene has already been made safe and secured for the investigation.
The write-up should include:
A description of the fact-finding activities you would do, with details about: the evidence you might collect, interviews you would conduct, and documents you would review.
A listing of the facts you find.
A “Why Tree” analysis of the facts you find, specifically listing the causal factors (direct causes, contributing causes, root causes)
The recommendations you make for corrective action
Note: Each root cause you identify must have at least one (1) recommendation for correction
Sources of Information
More details on the attachment also I have provided some sources you can use as well if you have other sources you use them.
Presentation as a projectmanagerimplementating a newcomputersystem in an organization
You are a project manager assigned to implementing a new computer system in an organization:
Why is it important to understand usability, configurability, and interoperability? Should these concepts outweigh the underlining cost of the new system? Which system do you recommend and why?
During phase one, you are selecting a team. What characteristics are important to consider when selecting a team?
During phase two the following principle was discussed, “lead with culture, determining where the resistance is,” and then, engage all levels of employees (Sipes, 2019, p. 161). What does this principle mean to you and how can you implement this principle?
How will you handle physician and other key professionals’ resistance to change and using the new system?
Discuss possible pitfalls during the implementation phase and how you can avoid them?
Be sure to include a title slide, objective slide, content slides, reference slide in APA format. Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least three (3) scholarly citations to support your claims.
