Management

MSL-0686StrategicLeadership in Education6pgPaper

MSL-0686StrategicLeadership in Education6pgPaper

Review, analyze and critique an organizational’s strategic plan using the SWOT model.

Each critique should contain the following elements.

This paper must be 6 in length, not counting the title and reference pages. It must include a minimum of 5 scholarly references. This is a scholarly paper that should be based on research, not just on personal opinions and experiences.

Paper should also have appropriate headings and sub-headings in the body of the paper.

Write transition sentences between sections so that the reader knows where you are going and why.

Appearance, punctuation, grammar, neatness, and spelling count.

Every assignment must include the FCE title page (found in APA/Writing Resources) and a reference list in APA form and style.

Please review the syllabus for additional information.

MSL-0686StrategicLeadership in Education6pgPaper Read More »

3 Pages OSHA Causal Analysis: Hamlet Chicken Plant Fire

3 Pages OSHA Causal Analysis: Hamlet Chicken Plant Fire

For the Hamlet, N.C. Chicken Processing Plant fire, imagine yourself doing an accident investigation of the accident, write-up a description of the investigation. Note: You may fabricate (“make-up”) as many details as you need. Note: You don’t include the Initial Response phase of the investigation…..the scene has already been made safe and secured for the investigation.

The write-up should include:

  1. A description of the fact-finding activities you would do, with details about: the evidence you might collect, interviews you would conduct, and documents you would review.
  2. A listing of the facts you find.
  3. A “Why Tree” analysis of the facts you find, specifically listing the causal factors (direct causes, contributing causes, root causes)
  4. The recommendations you make for corrective action
    1. Note: Each root cause you identify must have at least one (1) recommendation for correction

Sources of Information

More details on the attachment also I have provided some sources you can use as well if you have other sources you use them.

3 Pages OSHA Causal Analysis: Hamlet Chicken Plant Fire Read More »

CCMH/581: Supervision/Management In Clinical Mental Health Counseling Critical Thinking in Clinical Supervision

CCMH/581: Supervision/Management In Clinical Mental Health Counseling

Critical Thinking in Clinical Supervision

 

Assignment Content

  1. In counseling supervision, ethical behavior and decision-making is extremely important and required by different ethical codes and legal statutes. This assignment will bring awareness of the ethical codes and legal statutes that relate to clinical supervision and will assist in the process of ethical decision-making through critical thinking.
    Locate and review the Approved Clinical Supervisor, the American Counseling Association, and National Board for Certified Counselors codes of ethics.
    Research specific legal statutes relevant to clinical supervision in your state. ‘State of Nevada’
    Create a 50- to 100-word scenario of a situation that includes 2 to 3 ethical and legal dilemmas.
    Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper explaining the ethical and legal dilemmas.
    Include the following:

    • Provide your ethical and legal dilemmas in a clinical supervision scenario.
    • Outline the specific ethical codes and legal statutes relevant to the situation.
    • Explain how the ethical codes and legal statutes apply in the situation.
    • Propose a specific plan of action for the clinical supervisor by citing applicable ethical codes to resolve the ethical and legal dilemmas.
    • Describe the role of the clinical supervisor in counselor development in this scenario.

    Include a minimum of 2 sources.
    Format your paper according to APA guidelines.

please make sure to spell check and correct typos, site the work within the body of text according to APA guidelines and list all reference.

CCMH/581: Supervision/Management In Clinical Mental Health Counseling Critical Thinking in Clinical Supervision Read More »

Presentation as a projectmanagerimplementating a newcomputersystem in an organization

Presentation as a projectmanagerimplementating a newcomputersystem in an organization

You are a project manager assigned to implementing a new computer system in an organization:

  • Why is it important to understand usability, configurability, and interoperability? Should these concepts outweigh the underlining cost of the new system? Which system do you recommend and why?
  • During phase one, you are selecting a team. What characteristics are important to consider when selecting a team?
  • During phase two the following principle was discussed, “lead with culture, determining where the resistance is,” and then, engage all levels of employees (Sipes, 2019, p. 161). What does this principle mean to you and how can you implement this principle?
  • How will you handle physician and other key professionals’ resistance to change and using the new system?
  • Discuss possible pitfalls during the implementation phase and how you can avoid them?
  • Describe your personal experience with automation and new information systems.
  • Be sure to include a title slide, objective slide, content slides, reference slide in APA format. Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least three (3) scholarly citations to support your claims.

Presentation as a projectmanagerimplementating a newcomputersystem in an organization Read More »

Human Resource Management Strategy

Human Resource Management Strategy

Topic: Human Resource Management Strategy

Write a forty (40) page paper in which you:

  1. Use the following outline guide to document a Human Resource Management Strategy. At a minimum, it must address the following areas:
  1. Use at least ten (10) peer reviewed articles resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
  • Spacing setting must be: Before=0, After=0, Line spacing =Double, At= blank

Use the following template for the paper… APA_Template_With_Advice_(6th_Ed) .doc

Sections of the Capstone

  • Title Page
  • Abstract
  • Introduction / Background
  • Purpose Statement / Research Question(s)
  • Literature Review
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References
  • Appendices

Title Page

  • Title of Project
    • Subtitle, if applicable
  • Your Name
  • Faculty Advisor’s Name
  • Date Submitted

Abstract

  • Summarizes the entire paper
  • Should be written after the rest of the paper
  • Required as part of the third submission
  • Should be written in same organizational scheme as the rest of the paper
  • Can be written as in sections of paper – introduction, methods, results, discussion, conclusion
  • Length should not exceed 300 word

Introduction / Background

  • What is the topic, and why is it important?
  • What other research has been conducted on this topic?
  • What do we already know?

Purpose Statement / Research Question(s)

  • Purpose Statement / Research Question(s)
  • What is the purpose of this paper?
  • What question are you trying to answer?
  • Be brief – If more than 1 purpose/question, limit to 1 short paragraph on each

Literature Review

  • Paper must include lit review
    • Could be included in various sections
      • Introduction/Background
      • Literature Review (as separate section)
      • Results (if performing lit review as project)
    • Choose the most appropriate section for your paper
  • Should provide basis for paper
  • Synthesize & discuss reviewed literature
    • What have previous studies shown?
    • What are the strengths, weaknesses, trends, & opportunities?
  • Must cite numerous reputable sources
    • Ex – journal articles, books, technical reports, etc.

Methods

  • What methodology did you use?
  • How did you do your study?
    • Possible methodologies to discuss:
      • Design
      • Setting
      • Participants
      • Intervention
      • Outcome measures
      • Sampling
      • Measurement
      • Data collection
      • Analysis of data

Results

  • What were the results? What did you find?
  • What did the study/project demonstrate or accomplish?
  • Be detailed and specific
  • Consider organizing into sub-sections
  • Display information in various formats
    • Use bulleted lists, tables, charts, graphs, etc.

Discussion

  • Discuss results in detail
  • Put into context of existing base of knowledge
    • How do these results fit into data presented in lit review?
    • Do they support/contradict previous findings?
  • Discuss limitations
    • What were the limitations of this study?
    • Did you encounter any difficulties or barriers in the implementation of this project?

Conclusion

  • Discrete conclusions supported by evidence
  • Summarize findings
    • Give equal attention to positive and negative conclusions
  • Implications of your project
    • Given the results, why is it important?
  • Further study/effort implied by conclusions
    • What further research/programs are needed?
    • What do you recommend?

References

  • You MUST cite your sources
  • Cite sources in body of paper (not just at end)
  • Use APA format

Appendices

  • Additional info / support materials
  • Examples
    • Letters of support / IRB letters
    • Survey/interview instruments
    • Data analysis coding sheet
    • Other

Human Resource Management Strategy Read More »

Scroll to Top