Hello. I need help answering these questions. I have done the self-assessment and attached the score and the interpretation of the result. for question 3, I’ve talked to my professor and he said use a hypothetical situation.
Understanding our leadership styles will help us maximize our skills. This will also help us evaluate our effectiveness in specific leadership situations.
Not all leadership styles are as effective in the same situations. Understanding the best leadership style for each situation will help us create effective strategies to achieve organizational goals.
Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:
Be 4-5 pages in length (double-spaced), which does not include the title and reference pages, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
Use academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.
Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least three current, scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles. Current articles are those published within the last five years.
Examine Figure 4.6 in the Activity titled “Completing and Conducting the Appraisal.” Choose two of the suggestions from Figure 4.6 and explain why they are vital to developing a performance evaluation system. If you were responsible for improving your appraisal process, which suggestion from the table would you focus on implementing immediately and why? Please include specific examples from the reading to support your response.
It is necessary to provide formal feedback to employees through a systematic performance evaluation system. The HR professional should know how often performance evaluations should be given and if they are tied to pay increases.
The next step is to make sure you know the goals of the performance evaluation; for example, is the goal to improve performance and also identify people for succession planning? You will then determine the source for the performance evaluation data, and then create criteria and rating scales that relate directly to the employee’s job description. Once this is done, the successful functioning of the performance evaluation system largely depends on the HR professional to implement and communicate the system to managers and employees. This will be the primary focus of our next section.
Best Practices in Performance Appraisals
The most important things to remember when developing a performance evaluation system include the following (see Figure 4.6):
Make sure the evaluation has a direct relationship to the job. Consider developing specific criteria for each job, based on the individual job specifications and description.
Involve managers when developing the process. Garner their feedback to obtain “buy-in” for the process.
Consider involving the employee in the process by asking the employee to fill out a self-evaluation.
Use a variety of methods to rate and evaluate the employee.
Avoid bias by standardizing performance evaluations systems for each job.
Give feedback on performance throughout the year, not just during performance review times.
Make sure the goals of the performance evaluation tie into the organizational and department goals.
Ensure the performance appraisal criteria also tie into the goals of the organization, for a strategic HRM approach.
Review the evaluation for each job title often, since jobs and expectations change.
Figure 4.6
As you can see from Figure 4.6, the performance appraisal aspect is just one part of the total process. We can call this a performance review system. The first step of the process is goal setting with the employee. This could mean showing the employee his or her performance appraisal criteria or sitting down with the employee to develop MBOs. The basic idea here is that the employee should know the expectations and how his or her job performance will be rated.
Constant monitoring, feedback, and coaching are the next step. Ensuring the employee knows what he or she is doing well and is not doing well in a more informal manner will allow for a more productive employee.
Next, of course, is the formal performance evaluation process. Choosing the criteria, rating scale, and source of the evaluation are steps we have already discussed. The next step is to work with the employee to develop improvement plans (if necessary) and offer any rewards as a result of excellent performance. The process then begins again, setting new goals with the employee.
-Post adds value by raising novel points or providing new perspectives.
-Post is concise and clearly written in an academic tone; Sentences are complete; spelling, grammar and punctuation are correct.
ApplyingLessonsLearned to Enterprises [WLOs: 2, 4] [CLOs: 4, 6]
Much of the focus of this class has been on how countries, institutions, entrepreneurs, and others can systematically encourage innovation and entrepreneurship, and how these can be leveraged into sustainable economic gains. Write a paper that takes the lessons learned from this research and analysis and applies it to individual enterprises. Be certain to answer the following questions:
What techniques associated with encouraging innovation and entrepreneurship at a country scale can be successfully applied to individual enterprises?
How can the principles and practices associated with microenterprise and microfinance be applied to encourage innovation and entrepreneurship within individual enterprises?
How must these techniques be adapted to fit in the enterprise context?
What are the unique challenges associated with encouraging innovation and entrepreneurship at the enterprise scale vs. the country scale?
What institutional mechanisms can be put in place by governments and other entities that can help encourage innovation and entrepreneurship?
Wherever possible, apply your answers to your specific organization context and use examples from your own experience to support your views. Be sure to reference any case studies that you may have come across that illustrate how these techniques have been applied successfully to individual enterprises
The full-text version of this book is available through the Directory of Open Access Journals database in the University of Arizona Global Campus Library.
The full-text version of this book is available through the JSTOR database in the University of Arizona Global Campus Library.
Paweta, E., & Kirillov, Y. (2016). Analysis of determinants of early-stage entrepreneurial activity In Russia. Comparative Economic Research, 19(1), 65-76.
The full-text version of this book is available through the Directory of Open Access Journals database in the University of Arizona Global Campus Library.
Su, J., Zhai, Q., & Landström, H. (2015). Entrepreneurship research in China: Internationalization or contextualization? Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 27(1-2), 50-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2014.999718
The full-text version of this book is available through the EconLit database in the University of Arizona Global Campus Library.
Write a minimum of a four-page paper, plus the title page and a reference page on the following statement:
1. To complete this Case Study: Reverse Logistics primarily concerns itself with recovering material and/or economic value from products which are at the end of their useful life. This class will familiarize participants with motives, theory, and practical application, using a variety of sources including textbooks and case studies as well as scientific literature.
2. Review Managing Reverse Logistics reading text and specifically, CH 3 Case studies. Choose a case Study, review the information and pull together the past exercises to develop your methodology and supporting methods to either agree or disagree with the Case Study. Explain your reasoning in an APA style paper of 1-2 pages. Write your Case study in a memorandum format, with a business header, Include the Case Study problem statement; You do not need to post Case Study Response to the Discussion Folder, You will be graded on Content, Understanding, Timeliness, Critical Thinking, Correctness of Writing.
– To demonstrate the realization of these outcomes by achieving an adequate overall standard in the assessment process
Incorporate at least one reference from articles listed within the online APUS library.
Requirements: 4 pages: 2 pg explanation paper of case study and 2 pg case study
I have attached the book to choose the case study from CH3. I left it up to you which case study you would like to choose from. I have also attached my past forum posts if it helps.
The post had said a 2 pg apa style paper for the reasoning and the case study in a memo format