Select number of pages: 3
Question Description: 1.When reviewing the literature and different types of evidence for your project, what gaps in the findings did you encounter? How could these gaps influence other researchers?
2.What is the difference between statistically significant evidence and clinically significant evidence? How would each of these findings be used to advance an evidenced-based practice project?
Answer preview
The gathered knowledge from the New York state law on child welfare is sound in counselor decision making. The strategies and interventions that I will employ in my profession must be consistent with these laws. When faced with child issues, the ultimate priority in decision-making is to promote the child’s best interests (Zell, 2016). it extends to freeing the child from their biological parents for adoption if a nurturing relationship is non-existent. Also, if I suspect abuse of drugs and alcohol that may affect a child’s mental, emotional and physical health, it is appropriate to gather evidence in this state before reporting.
Conclusion
The essence of reviewing the state laws on child welfare for counseling practice is that they provide a deep insight into all the rules and regulations. The information presented will help in adhering to the unique laws that vary between states. In New York, it is essential to promote the child’s interests based on their overall health and safety.
[823 Words]
