Medical Marijuana Act.

Complete an in-depth comparative analysis of two policies developed on an issue. This can be a comparison across state policies on an issue, or a comparison of the evolution of a policy. Examples include drug policy, capital punishment, and domestic violence.

Create a 10- to 12-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation with detailed speaker notes. Use complete sentences, with correct grammar and punctuation, to fully explain each slide as if you were giving an in-person presentation.

Include the following in your presentation:

  • Create a chart or table that compares aspects of each policy side-by-side.
  • Answer the following questions:
  • What is the issue?
  • What are the two policies developed? Be sure to clearly explain these policies: goal, objectives, and measures.
  • What led to the development of each policy?
  • What is the relationship between implementation, evaluation, and reform? Explain how these affect each policy highlighted.
  • How are they different? Which is more effective?

Answer preview

  • Arizona takes the enforcement approach borrowed from President Nixon’s war on drugs.
  • It developed from public pressure for state to protect patients with terminal or severe illnesses (Orenstein, 2015).
  • Proposition 203 of 2010 was the result of numerous attempts to relax stringent drug laws in Arizona.
  • A 2016 attempt to legalize recreational use failed.
  • Ongoing efforts in 2010 show that marijuana use is a pertinent policy issue.

[Slide 5 of 12]

Scroll to Top