Ethics, Politics, and Economics of Policy Assignment
There are many influences when a policy is being considered. Economical, ethical, and political issues are faced by executives and politicians, who are influenced by lobbyists and others who have a concerted interest in the success or failure of the policy.
Write a two-to three-page letter on one of the following prompts, taking one of the perspectives as below, speaking in that designated voice, keeping in mind financial concerns, ethical and social issues and the human factor.
As the aid to the governor of your state, you are preparing her speech to outline the economic, ethical, and political aspects of the issue of providing undocumented workers with worker’s compensation as a requirement for employment.
As the Chief Financial Officer of a state funded hospital you are writing to the governor lobbying him on the issue of providing undocumented workers with healthcare access when injured as your hospital is now absorbing all costs.
As the owner of a small landscaping business, you write a letter to the governor of your state lobbying for your position, for or against, on the requirement to supply worker s compensation to undocumented workers.
Your letter should be written following current APA style guidelines.
Ethics, Politics, and Economics of Policy Assignment Rubric
M3 Ethics, Politics, and Economics of Policy Assignment Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocused Topic: Ethics, Politics and Economics of Occupational Policy
18.75 to >16.85 ptsA
Student clearly and thoroughly addresses and convinces, in letter format and in the correct perspective, the primary issue of providing workman’s compensation for undocumented workers.
16.85 to >14.98 ptsB
Student adequately addresses and convinces, in letter format and in the correct perspective, the primary issue of providing workman’s compensation for undocumented workers. 1-2 elements may be overlooked or additional detail would be beneficial.
14.98 to >13.1 ptsC
Student addresses only a few elements, in letter format and in the correct perspective, the primary issue of providing workman’s compensation for undocumented workers.
13.1 to >0 ptsF
Student does not address the primary issue of providing workman’s compensation for undocumented workers, or the elements described are unclear or inaccurate.
18.75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
18.75 to >16.85 ptsA
Student clearly articulates a thorough analysis of the various key points in providing workman’s compensation for undocumented workers.
16.85 to >14.98 ptsB
Student adequately analyzes the various key points in providing workman’s compensation for undocumented workers; 1-2 elements may be overlooked, or additional detail would be beneficial.
14.98 to >13.1 ptsC
Student addresses only a few elements in their analysis of the various key points in providing workman’s compensation for undocumented workers; lacks a demonstration of critical thinking.
13.1 to >0 ptsF
Student does not show an understanding of analysis of the various key points in providing workman’s compensation for undocumented workers, or the elements described are unclear or inaccurate.
18.75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence and Support
18.75 to >16.85 ptsA
Student clearly articulates a thorough examination of the evidence related to the topic through various and current examples
16.85 to >14.98 ptsB
Student provides an examination of the evidence related to the topic through various and current examples; could benefit from additional detail.
14.98 to >13.1 ptsC
Student provides examination of only a few elements of the evidence related to related to the topic through various and current examples; lacks a demonstration of critical thinking.
13.1 to >0 ptsF
Student fails to examine any elements of the evidence related to related to the topic and does not provide current examples, or the examples provided do not make sense in the context of the examination.
18.75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Writing
7.5 to >6.74 ptsA
Writing demonstrates attention to logic and reasoning of points; writing is unified and clearly leads the reader through the points presented. Writing is of high quality and in scholarly tone and has high quality references.
6.74 to >5.99 ptsB
Writing is coherent and logically organized, although somewhat wordy in places. Writing has some errors but is adequate and maintains scholarly tone and high quality references.
5.99 to >5.24 ptsC
Writing is coherent and logically organized, although some points may stray from the topic, and some passages are unnecessarily wordy. Writing is of lower quality but still has some scholarly elements and /or lower quality references.
5.24 to >0 ptsF
Writing is disorganized and difficult to follow, may be unnecessarily wordy. Writing is of poor quality and/or not written in scholarly tone and/or uses poor quality references.
7.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat (APA, Spelling, Grammar, Length)
11.25 to >10.11 ptsA
Entry meets length requirements with no errors in APA format, spelling, or grammar
10.11 to >8.98 ptsB
Entry meets length requirements with only a few minimal errors in APA format, spelling, and/or grammar; these errors do not detract from the readability of the entry
8.98 to >7.86 ptsC
Entry meets length requirements with several errors in APA format, spelling, and/or grammar; spell-check and grammar-check is recommended to help catch these errors
7.86 to >0 ptsF
Entry does not meet length requirements, and/or has extensive errors in APA format, spelling, and/or grammar; use of the University Writing Center is highly recommended
Annotation of a Qualitative Research Article Assignment
This week, you will submit the annotation of a qualitative research article on a topic of your interest. Narrative, ethnographic, grounded theory, case study, and phenomenology are examples of types of research designs or approaches used in qualitative research.
An annotation consists of three separate paragraphs that cover three respective components: summary, analysis, and application. These three components convey the relevance and value of the source. As such, an annotation demonstrates your critical thinking about, and authority on, the source topic. This week’s annotation is a precursor to the annotated bibliography assignment due in Week 10.
An annotated bibliography is a document containing selected sources accompanied by a respective annotation of each source. In preparation for your own future research, an annotated bibliography provides a background for understanding a portion of the existing literature on a particular topic. It is also a useful first step in gathering sources in preparation for writing a subsequent literature review as part of a dissertation.
Please review the assignment instructions below and click on the underlined words for information about how to craft each component of an annotation.
Please use the document “Annotated Bibliography Template with Example” for additional guidance.
It is recommended that you use the grading rubric as a self-evaluation tool before submitting your assignment.
By Day 7
Use the Walden library database to search for a qualitative research article from a peer-reviewed journal on a topic of your interest.
Before you read the full article and begin your annotation, locate the methodology section in the article to be sure that the article describes a qualitative study. Confirm that one of the types of qualitative research designs or approaches, such as narrative, ethnographic, grounded theory, case study, or phenomenology, was used in the study.
Annotate one qualitative research article from a peer-reviewed journal on a topic of your interest.
Provide the reference list entry for this article in APA Style followed by a three-paragraph annotation that includes:
Just One journal. please let me know the topic you choose
Journal Entry
Write two seperate journal entry about your experience with the organization you have chosen to study. 2-3 (800-1200 words each) single spaced each, 12 point font. These entries are up to you in terms of content — they can be good, bad or neutral experiences as long as they reflect upon the organization of your focus. Please feel free expansive in your interpretation of these guidelines.
The Topic I chose is NBA during COVID-19. Please don’t write them too unrealistic.
You can’t write I’m a Lakers fan in one journal a Celtics fan in the other.
Requirements: 800-1200 words each
first essay is about I’m a Lakers fan, choose something similar..
I need no less than 1000WORDS no more than 1200 words
Just One journal. please let me know the topic you choose
Journal Entry
Write two seperate journal entry about your experience with the organization you have chosen to study. 2-3 (800-1200 words each) single spaced each, 12 point font. These entries are up to you in terms of content — they can be good, bad or neutral experiences as long as they reflect upon the organization of your focus. Please feel free expansive in your interpretation of these guidelines.
The Topic I chose is NBA during COVID-19. Please don’t write them too unrealistic.
You can’t write I’m a Lakers fan in one journal a Celtics fan in the other.
Requirements: 800-1200 words each
I need no less than 1000WORDS no more than 1200 words
Just One journal. please let me know the topic you choose
Journal Entry
Write two seperate journal entry about your experience with the organization you have chosen to study. 2-3 (800-1200 words each) single spaced each, 12 point font. These entries are up to you in terms of content — they can be good, bad or neutral experiences as long as they reflect upon the organization of your focus. Please feel free expansive in your interpretation of these guidelines.
The Topic I chose is NBA during COVID-19. Please don’t write them too unrealistic.
You can’t write I’m a Lakers fan in one journal a Celtics fan in the other.
For this paper, select an organization with which you are familiar, (if working as a group brainstorm and decide on one) and use Bolman & Deal’s common fallacies to analyze the organization’s functioning and behavior. The organization may be one in which you work, volunteer, or otherwise interact – you should know it well enough to be able to describe it in detail and apply the organizational problems effectively.
Include analysis of at least one fallacy, demonstrating how the fallacies make sense of the organization’s systems. The fallacies from Bolman & Deal include: blaming people; blaming the bureauracy; thirsting for power. You must have a minimum of 5-7 articles outside the course texts in your reference list and the material from these articles must be integrated into the analysis.
APA style must be used throughout the paper, including headings, citations and reference list.
Your paper must include the following elements:
Description of the organization including overview of its systems.
Discussion of how the fallacies interact or co-exist in the organization
Discussion of how identification of the fallacy can be applied to the improvement of your organization’s systems that deals with the specific leadership opportunities you identified for your organization through this assignment
If done as a pair/group – all names should appear on the cover sheet, each person should upload the final draft of the paper to their individual drop box – and “note well” each person receives the same grade.
Paper Requirements:
Length of paper 5-7 pages not including the title or reference page.
Use 5-7 scholarly references to support your research and arguments. Must be published within the last 5-7 years.
This is a scholarly paper that should be based on research, not just on personal opinions and experiences.
Submit (upload) as a Word document in the assignment area
