Business Studies may be defined as a combination of inter-related business subjects which lead to learning of basic knowledge and skills. It is a course in education that is designed to cover the basic elementary knowledge and skills in organizing business enterprises as well as general office administration.
In case you couldn’t get in the textbook I copied the entire page with the ethical delimmas
“The following scenarios present a set of ethical dilemmas that might arise in marketing research. Your assignment is to decide what action to take in each instance. You should be prepared to justify your decision. Bear in mind that there are no uniquely right answers: Reasonable people may choose different courses of action.1.You are the market research director of a pharmaceutical company, and the executive director suggests to you that companyinterviewerstelephonephysiciansunderthename of a fictitious market research agency. The purpose of the survey is to help assess the perceived quality of the company ’ s products, and it is felt that the suggested pro-cedure will result in more objective responses.What action would you take? 2.You are employed by a marketing research firm and have conductedanattitudestudyforaclient.Yourfindingsindicate that the product ’ s marketing efforts are not effec-tive. This finding is badly received by the client ’ s product managementteam.Theyrequestthatyouomitthatdatafrom your formal report, which you know will be widely distributed, on the grounds that the oral presentation was adequate for their needs.What do you do? 3.You are a study director for a research company undertak-ing a project for a regular client of your company. A study you are working on is about to go into the field when the questionnaireyousenttotheclientforfinalapprovalcomes back drastically modified. The client has rewritten it,introducingleadingquestionsandbiasedscales.Anaccompanying letter indicates that the questionnaire must be sent out as revised. You do not believe that valid infor-mation can be gathered using the revised instrument.What action would you take? 4.A well‐respected public figure is going to face trial on a chargeoffailingtoreporthispartownershipofcertainregulated companies while serving as a Canadian provin-cialminister.Thedefenselawyershaveaskedyou,asamarketresearchspecialist,todoaresearchstudytodeterminethecharacteristicsofpeoplemostlikelytosympathizewiththedefendantandhencetovoteforacquittal.Thedefenselawyershavereadnewspaperaccounts of how this approach has been used in a number of instances.What action would you take? 5.You are the market research director for a large chemical company.Recentresearchindicatesthatmanyofyourcompany’scustomers aremisusingoneofitsprincipalproducts.Thereisnodangerresultingfromthismisuse,though customers are wasting money by using too much of the product at one time. You are shown the new adver-tisingcampaignbytheadvertisingagency.Theadsnotonly ignore this problem of misuse, they actually seem to encourage it.What action would you take? 6.Youshowupyourfirstdayforasummerinternshiptomeet your supervisor and get your first assignment. She givesyouaquestionnairewithspecificmarketingplan-ningquestionsandtellsyouthatshewouldlikeyoutocontactthecompany’smainthreecompetitorsandtellthem you are a student doing a study on the industry and get the answers to the questions. She says you should not tell them you are working for the company over the sum-merandadds“thereisnothingwrongwithnottellingthem—omitting the fact is not really lying.” You ask her whatyoushoulddoif theyask,andshesays‘justtellthem you are a student working on a paper and you don ’ t want to get a poor grade on the assignment.”What action would you take? 1 These vignettes were provided through the courtesy of Professor Charles Weinberg,UniversityofBritishColumbia,andarereproducedwithhispermission.“
Janet Johnson, an African American woman, has been working at the Tennessee Hydroelectric plant for 15 years. During that time, his performance reviews have been exemplary. She decided to apply for the new plant foreman position. Although she felt that she was eminently qualified for the position, she also was growing tired of a certain good old boy culture at the plant. For years, the plant has had a culture of highly lewd “jokes,” and many of the employees had also engaged in inappropriate touching of female employees. The plant had an anti-harassment policy on record, but Janet’s boss shrugged and said “boys will be boys” when she reported the harassment to him.
Competition for the position was fierce. But ultimately, Jose Martinez, a Chilean man, received the position. Jose had 7 years of experience. Unbeknownst to the applicants the promotion board secretly ran a credit check on the applicants. Janet credit score came in as lower as average, and this factored into the board’s decision. Although he met the qualifications of the position, one of the hiring managers told Janet in confidence that Janet was the most qualified person for the job. And the other managers had applied a racial preference on Jose’s behalf due to there never having been a Latino manager at the plant even though Latino’s represented 35% of employees at the plant. Janet sues the plant for disparate treatment, disparate impact, and sexual harassment under Title VII.
Questions
1. List the elements of disparate treatment and apply them to this case. Can Janet prove a prima facie case? How would the plant rebuff these charges? Who would ultimately prevail?
2. List the elements of a disparate impact case and apply them to this case? Will Janet prevail on this charge?
3. List the elements of the sexual harassment case and apply them to this case? Can the plant establish an affirmative defense?
4. If the plant argues that it applied a racial preference to Jose to correct a manifest imbalance at the plant of underutilization of certain minorities, will the plant prevail? Why or why not?
5. Was it legal to use the credit check as a factor in the promotion decision the way that it was done here? Why or why not?
Part 2
QUESTION 1
List and briefly describe (in your own words) the three main reasons for government regulation of businesses.
please write down the website link at the end so it help me to review the content that you wrote
Also i posted full project requirement in the doc. to help you understand what is project all about . and ONLY need to do section 7 and 8.
Section 7: Recognition of Individual Contributions (10 pts)
Determine for each job what contribution policy you will use (seniority-based pay, merit-
based pay, incentive-based pay, or person-focused pay), explain why you will use that
policy for each job, and explain how pay might be adjusted based on that policy (Note:
more than one contribution policy can apply to each job. For example, someone who is
an engineer might receive merit-based increases to pay in conjunction with incentive-
based pay (bonuses)).
Section 8: Employee Benefits (10 pts)
Describe what sort of benefits that you would provide all employees (both legally
required and discretionary benefits) and why you would offer this set of benefits.
Discuss the principles of research and evidence-based practice and how to effectively implement them for advanced practice nurses.
There are various principles related to research, for example, the 4 main ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. In addition, discuss evidence-based practice (EBP) and how will you implement EBP into your practice as an APN.
and how to effectively implement them for advanced practice nurses.
There are various principles related to research, for example, the 4 main ethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. In addition, discuss evidence-based practice (EBP) and how will you implement EBP into your practice as an APN.